Summary Several recently published studies discuss the concept of inductive resistivity-logging devices with oblique transmitting and/or receiving coils. Both wireline induction and logging-while-drilling (LWD) propagation resistivity-tool concepts have been considered. Directional resistivity measurements and improved anisotropy measurements are among the benefits promised by this type of device. Analyses based on point-magnetic dipole antennas were used to illustrate these potential benefits. The effects of a metallic mandrel, borehole, and invasion were not considered because of the absence of a suitable forward model. This paper characterizes mandrel, borehole, and invasion effects for a variety of candidate tilt-coil devices with antenna array parameters similar to those of the previous studies. The characterization is based on calculations from a new forward model that includes tilted transmitting and receiving coils of finite diameter embedded in a concentric cylindrical structure. Important details of the forward model used in the calculations are also provided. Introduction Conventional propagation resistivity devices are routinely used for geosteering applications. Because data from these devices have essentially no azimuthal sensitivity, the LWD engineer is greatly aided by a priori information regarding the proximity of the target bed relative to other geologic features such as shales and water-bearing zones. Suitable a priori information is often available from offset logs. In cases in which offset logs are not fully useful because of changing depositional environments or different tectonic settings, azimuthally sensitive resistivity data would improve the quality of the geosteering effort. One way to achieve azimuthal sensitivity to benefit geo-steering (and to use it for imaging) is to construct a tool similar to a conventional propagation resistivity device, but with the transmitters and/or receivers tilted with respect to the axis of the drill collar. In fact, directional resistivity tools(DRTs) have been proposed in the literature for this pur-pose.1–3 To the knowledge of the authors, DRTs have only been analyzed with point-dipolemodels, which ignore both the drill collar and the finite size of the antennas. For apparent lack of a suitable forward model, mandrel, borehole, and invasion effects have not been considered in the literature. A model has been developed that accounts for tilted transmitters and receivers embedded in arbitrary layers of a concentric cylindrical structure. Many important details of this model are discussed in Appendix A. The term mandrel effect is used here to denote the difference between values calculated with a point-dipole model and the model that accounts for the mandrel encompassed by the antennas. Mandrel effects on DRT measurements will be grouped into three categories:Absolute effects where the mandrel primarily attenuates the signals because of a reduction in the magnetic moment of the antennas.Residual effects that remain after an air-hang calibration is applied to the data.Perturbations to the azimuthal sensitivity of the measurement caused by the finite size of the antennas and the drill collar. Algorithms that transform raw tool measurements to resistivity values can be based on computationally simple point-dipole solutions without significantly degrading the accuracy of the results if mandrel effects associated with categories 1 and 2 can be suppressed. For conventional LWD propagation resistivity measurements, mandrel effects of type 1 are addressed by air-hang calibration. Algorithms that suppress type 2 mandrel effects are discussed in the literature.4 Type 3 mandrel effects are not discussed here.
This paper presents our perspective of the shallow-water flow (SWF) problemin the Deepwater Gulf of Mexico (GOM). The nature of the problem, includingareal extent and overpressuring mechanisms, is discussed. Methods for sandprediction and shallow sediment and flow characterization are reviewed. Theseinclude seismic techniques, the use of geotechnical wells, regional trends, various MWD methods, and cements and settable spots. Finally, examples of flowincidents with pertinent drilling issues, including well failures andabandonment, are described. Total trouble costs due to shallow-water flow for all GOM operators probablyruns into the several hundred million dollars. Though the problem remains aconcern, advances in our knowledge and understanding make it a problem that ismanageable and not the "show stopper" once feared. Introduction SWF may occur while drilling shallow over-pressured formations at deepwatersites. It is a high profile problem in the GOM, though it does occur elsewhere(Ref. 1) and will likely be encountered in other deepwater regions (Fig. 1). Drilling shallow over-pressured sands may cause large and long lastinguncontrolled flows, well damage and foundation failure, formation compaction, damaged casing, and re-entry and control problems. Most spectacularly, eruptions from over-pressured sands may result in seafloor craters, mounds andcracks (Figs. 2 and 3). Eaton2, 3 has described the significant problems causedby SWF in the Ursa area. A recent inspection of 106 wells (Ref. 4) indicatedthat $175 MM has been spent on SWF and prevention and remediation on thosewells. Total industry costs due to SWF likely exceed several $100 MM. The problem is compounded by the difficulty in seismically imaging thesesands (Refs. 5 and 6). This stems from the relatively low sand/shale contrastin acoustic impedance. The impact of this problem on well site selection andwell design is significant, and makes drilling in SWF areas particularlychallenging.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.