Significant genetic variation exists within and between breeds of beef cattle for age at puberty (AP). In general, faster-gaining breed groups of larger mature size reach puberty at a later age than do slower-gaining breed groups of smaller mature size; breeds selected for milk production reach puberty at younger ages than do those breeds not selected for milk production. Heterosis, independent of heterosis effects on weight, influences most measures of puberty in females and scrotal circumference (SC) in males. Crossbred heifers reach puberty at younger ages and heavier weights than their straightbred counterparts. Scrotal circumference has been shown to be an excellent indicator of AP in yearling bulls. Furthermore, a favorable genetic relationship exists between SC in bulls and AP of female offspring. Beef cattle breeders may take a direct approach to breeding for AP and subsequent reproduction by directly selecting for measures of fertility such as SC. However, an indirect approach, involving selection for an array of traits that provide an appropriate "genetic environment" for the expression of fertility (i.e., size, milk production, calving ease) may be preferred. Although seedstock producers are limited to making change through within-breed selection, commercial producers can take advantage of both within- and between-breed selection as well as crossbreeding to achieve the same goal.

The objective of this study was to determine an appropriate method for using yearling scrotal circumference observations and heifer pregnancy observations to produce EPD for heifer pregnancy. We determined the additive genetic effects of and relationship between scrotal circumference and heifer pregnancy for a herd of Hereford cattle in Solano, New Mexico. The binary trait of heifer pregnancy was defined as the probability of a heifer conceiving and remaining pregnant to 120 d, given that she was exposed at breeding. Estimates of heritability for heifer pregnancy and scrotal circumference were .138+/-.08 and .714+/-.132, respectively. Estimates of fixed effects for age of dam and age were significant for heifer pregnancy and bull scrotal circumference. The estimate of the additive genetic correlation between yearling heifer pregnancy and yearling bull scrotal circumference was .002+/-.45. Additional analyses included models with additive genetic groups for scrotal circumference EPD for heifer pregnancy or heifer pregnancy EPD for scrotal circumference to account for a potential nonlinear relationship between scrotal circumference and heifer pregnancy. Results support the development of a heifer pregnancy EPD because of a higher estimated heritability than previously reported. The development of a heifer pregnancy EPD would be an additional method for improving genetic merit for heifer fertility.

Field data on 4,233 yearling Hereford bulls were analyzed using fixed and mixed model least-squares procedures to examine factors affecting scrotal circumference; determine appropriate adjustment factors; and study genetic, environmental and phenotypic relationships among scrotal circumference and growth traits. Scrotal circumference was affected by postweaning feed level; contemporary group/feed level; age of dam; and covariates age, weight and height. Of the three covariates, weight had the greatest effect, and any factor which caused an increase in weight tended to increase scrotal circumference. Quadratic effects of age, weight, height and age X age of dam interaction effects were significant or approached significance, but were of minor importance. Large contemporary group effects suggested the need for expressing scrotal circumferences as trait ratios or as deviations from contemporary group means. Scrotal circumference adjustment factors recommended for yearling Hereford bulls were .026 cm X d-1 of age and .8, .2 and .1 for sons of 2-, 3- and 4-yr old dams, respectively. Heritability of weight-adjusted scrotal circumference was .46 +/- .06 compared with .49 +/- .06 for age-adjusted scrotal circumference, indicating considerable additive genetic variation for relative scrotal size. Correlations between scrotal circumference and growth traits were moderate to high. The genetic correlation between scrotal circumference and yearling weight was the highest of these at .44 +/- .16. Potential implications of this relationship are discussed.

Nonlinear mixed-model procedures for analysis of binary data were used to estimate heritability (h2), predict individual genetic merit, and determine genetic and environmental trends for four measures of stayability of beef females. Traits considered were probabilities of a female having 2 [S(2/1)], 5 [S(5/1)], 8 [S(8/1)] and 11 [S(11/1)] calves, given that she calved once. Colorado State University Beef Improvement Center (BIC) and Beckton Stock Farm (BSF) provided data for the analyses. Heritability was estimated using animal model marginal maximum likelihood (AM MML), sire model marginal maximum likelihood (SM MML), and animal model Method R (AM MR). Individual genetic merit was predicted using single-trait animal models with each h2 estimate. Birth year was treated as fixed in all analyses. Only AM MML yielded h2 estimates for all traits in both herds. The AM MML h2 estimates for S(2/1), S(5/1), S(8/1), and S(11/1) were .09, .11, .07, and .20, respectively, for BSF data and .02, .14, .09, and .07, respectively, for BIC data. Differing h2 estimates did not substantially influence rank of individual predictions. Genetic trends in stayability were positive in both herds, although birth year solutions indicated variable or negative environmental trends. Genetic improvement of stayability may be accelerated by incorporating predictions of genetic merit for stayability in selection criteria. S(5/1) may be the most useful trait for consideration in national cattle evaluations.

To estimate heritability (h2) for yearling heifer pregnancy and to estimate the genetic correlation between heifer pregnancy and scrotal circumference, 18,145 records of Nellore heifers exposed to breeding at an age of approximately 14 mo and 25,466 records of contemporary young bulls were analyzed. Heifer pregnancy was considered as a categorical trait, with the value 1 (success) assigned to heifers that were pregnant after rectal palpation approximately 60 d after the end of a 90-d breeding season and the value 0 (failure) otherwise. A single-trait animal model for heifer pregnancy and a two-trait animal model including heifer pregnancy and scrotal circumference were used. Contemporary groups were defined in two ways: including (CG2) or not including (CG1) weaning management of the heifer. Heritability estimates obtained by Method R in single-trait analyses were 0.68 +/- 0.09 and 0.61 +/- 0.10 using CG1 and CG2 definitions, respectively. Heritability estimates for two-trait analyses were 0.69 +/- 0.09 (CG1) and 0.63 +/- 0.08 (CG2) for heifer pregnancy and 0.57 +/- 0.03 (both CG) for scrotal circumference. The genetic correlation estimates between the two traits were 0.20 +/- 0.12 (CG1) and 0.20 +/- 0.13 (CG2). Based on the results of this study, EPD for heifer pregnancy can be used to select bulls for the production of precocious daughters and will be more effective than selecting on scrotal circumference EPD in Nellore cattle. However, scrotal circumference can be incorporated in a two-trait analysis to increase the accuracy of prediction for heifer pregnancy EPD for young bulls. Using contemporary group without heifer weaning management gave higher h2 and, for two-trait analysis, converged more quickly.