SummaryAntibodies to factor VIII (inhibitors) are usually produced at the beginning of treatment with factor VIII and are rare in multitransfused patients. Such antibodies are deemed to be patient-related, as supported by the description of a number of associated risk factors. However, a second category of inhibitors has recently been identified, namely antibodies occurring in multitransfused patients as a result of exposure to a particular factor VIII concentrate. A first outbreak of product-related inhibitors was recently described. The present paper describes the second well-documented occurrence of such inhibitors.Eight out of 140 multitransfused patients with severe haemophilia A developed an inhibitor to factor VIII shortly after changing treatment to a double-virus inactivated plasma-derived factor VIII concentrate. In addition to solvent-detergent treatment, this concentrate was pasteurised at 63° C for 10 hours. Exposure to the pasteurised product before inhibitor detection ranged from 9 to 45 days. Inhibitor titers varied between 2.2 and 60 Bethesda Units and recovery of transfused factor VIII ranged from 0.21 to 0.68 (expressed as IU/dl factor VIII rise per IU/kg administered). In contrast to usual inhibitors in haemophilia A patients, these product-related inhibitors showed complex inhibition kinetics. They were found specific for the factor VIII light chain. The inhibitors gradually declined when exposure to the pasteurised product was stopped, despite further treatment with other factor VIII concentrates. The present data stress the importance of carefully monitored clinical studies, both in previously treated and previously untreated patients, before introduction of a new or modified clotting factor concentrate.

By testing all donations as pools of 480 by un-nested PCR, and resolving positive pools to identify the responsible donations, it is possible to ensure that the viral load in fractionation pools (5000 donations) remains < 10(3) IU/ml, compatible with the efficacy of inactivation procedures and complying with Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recommendations.

Background and ObjectivesPlasma pools for the production of human plasma medicinal products are distinguished according to the collection method (recovered or apheresis plasma) and the donor remuneration status. National regulations and the physical status of the donor determine the donation frequency and plasma volume per session. Relevant protein contents of different types of pools have not fully been compared.Materials and MethodsWe compared the levels of total protein, 15 main relevant plasma protein markers, and anti-B19 and anti-Streptococcus pneumoniae IgG in single-type pools of donations from different countries (Belgium, Finland, France, the Netherlands, Germany, United States). Both recovered plasma from non-remunerated donors and apheresis plasma from remunerated and non-remunerated donors were studied.ResultsPools from paid US high-frequency, high-volume plasmapheresis donors showed significantly lower total protein (−9%), albumin (−15%), total IgG (−24%), IgM (−28%), hemopexin (−11%) and retinol-binding protein (−10%) but higher C1-inhibitor, pre-albumin and C-reactive protein contents than pools from unpaid European Union (EU) or US whole-blood or plasmapheresis donors. In contrast to pools from compensated EU plasmapheresis donors, pools from unpaid whole-blood or plasmapheresis donors showed no significant differences, whatever the collection method or country. Reductions in specific protein contents correlated well with protein half-life.ConclusionThese results should be taken into account with regard to donor health management and protein recovery.

No abstract

No abstract