Background: In the era of minimal invasive surgery, hernia repair has seen a paradigm shift from open to laparoscopic technique. However, superiority of laparoscopic repair over open repair is still controversial. Available literatures have shown laparoscopic technique to be better in term of post-operative pain and early return to work.Methods: In this prospective study, a total of 102 patients aged 21-78 years with inguinal hernia were recruited and enrolled into two comparative groups, namely Lichtenstein’s and Transabdominal pre-peritoneal, and each group containing 51 participants. Hospital ethical committee approval and written informed consent from patients was obtained. Primarily, the duration of operation, post-operative pain and complication, and quality of life after surgery was compared between the two different approaches of hernia repair.Results: The study results demonstrated a statistically significant superiority of trans abdominal pre-peritoneal repair over Lichtenstein’s hernioplasty in terms of post operative pain (2.00±0.63 vs 3.90±0.74 VAS score, P value<0.001), hospital stay (2.33±0.62 vs 2.96±0.20 days, P value <0.001) and quality of life with early return to normal work (13.39±0.60 vs 17.88±0.86 days, P value <0.001); whereas a prolonged operative time was seen in transabdominal pre-peritoneal repair (96.08±27.08 vs 42.55±5.95 mins, P value <0.001). Conclusions: This study has shown that transabdominal pre-peritoneal repair is better than Lichtenstein’s in respect to post-operative pain, quality of life and post-operative complication. However, it has prolonged operative duration than conventional method.

Background Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is an important but potentially invasive therapeutic procedure in treating various pancreatobiliary conditions. In Nepal, the ERCP services is limited to a few tertiary care centers mostly in the capital, Kathmandu. Dhulikhel hospital has started ERCP since 2011 providing services to patients from all over the country. The study analyzes the outcome from data since August 2011 to 2013 August.Objective To analyze the results of ERCP done in Dhulikhel hospital, Kathmandu University hospital.Method This is a retrospective study. The ERCP records of all the patients done since August 2011 to August 2013 were retrieved. A total of 516 attempts of ERCP were done since August 2011 to August 2013. Out of these, 423 were included for the analysis. The repeat ERCP for the same patient due to failed cannulation or patients undergone ERCP but incomplete documentation were excluded. The demographic data, indications, the findings, the outcome in terms of success or failure to cannulation, success or failure of stone extraction, stenting and complications were all derived and analyzed. SPSS 16 version was employed for data management and analysis.Result The female: male ratio was found to be 1.7 : 1. The mean age of patients were 50.57±17.8 Years. The most common indication for ERCP were: choledocholithiasis 208(49.17%); followed by: obstructive jaundice 69(16.3% ) of undetermined cause, acute biliary pancreatitis 26(6.4%), suspected bile duct injury during cholecystectomy 18(4.2%), periampullary growth 21( 4.96%), Cholangiocarcinoma 12(2.8%), chronic pancreatitis 10( 2.3%), CBD stent exchange 23(5.43%), dilated cbd 21(4.96%) , acute cholangitis 14(3.3%).The most common finding was CBD stone in 308(72.81%), normal in 51(12.1% ), bile duct stricture in 45(10.63%). Bile duct injury during cholecystectomy was found in 13(3.1%), biliary obstruction due to ampullary growth and pancreatic head mass was found in 21(4.96%) and 6(1.41%) respectively. Choledochal cyst was found in 5(1.2%), chronic pancreatitis in 7(1.7%). Biliary fascioliasis was found in one (0.24%); and roundworm in 1(0.24).The most common complication was acute pancreatitis in 17(4%), post-ERCP cholangitis 6(1.4%), bleeding 6(1.4%), duodenal perforation in 1(0.2%), arrhythmia in 1(0.2%) and one death (0.2%).Conclusion ERCP has been a potentially emerging therapeutic tool for various pancreato-biliary disorders in Nepal.Kathmandu University Medical Journal Vol.12(1) 2014: 55-59

Background Radiation is a necessary evil in Coronary Angiogram. The Interventional Cardiology procedure provides huge benefit to the patient but at the cost of radiation. There is evidence of cumulative effect of radiation. Therefore it is essential to keep the radiation dose as minimum as possible.Objective The aim of this study is to find out radiation exposed to the patient undergoing diagnostic coronary angiogram.Method A retrospective study was done. Those patients who underwent diagnostic coronary angiogram were selected for the study. There were total of 166 patients. Radiation exposure in terms of fluoroscopy time in minute and dose area product (DAP) in Gy.cm2 was recorded.Result Out 166 patients 92 were male and 74 female. Age range was from 39 to 79 years with mean age 58.13±9.14. Amount of contrast used was in range of 30 to 100 ml with mean of 45.54±14.06. Range of fluoroscopy time was 2.60 to 37.00 minutes with mean 11.38±6.80. Mean fluoroscopy time in male was 10.92±5.82 minutes and in females it was 11.92±7.68 minutes, with p 0.331. The range of DAP was 11.00 Gy.cm2 to 106.00 Gy.cm2 with mean 40.73±23.58 Gy.cm2. The mean DAP in male and female was 38.77±23.26 Gy.cm2 and 43.16±23.90 Gy.cm2 respectively with p 0.234.Conclusion From this study we can conclude that the radiation exposure to our patient undergoing coronary angiogram is similar to the international values in terms DAP but more in terms of fluoroscopy time. When males and females compared there is no difference.Kathmandu University Medical Journal Vol.13(1) 2015; 61-63