Wound treatment in a flexible transparent chamber attached to the perimeter of the wound and containing a liquid has been extensively tested in preclinical experiments in pigs and found to offer several advantages. It protects the wound; the liquid medium or saline in the chamber provides in vivo tissue culture-like conditions; and antibiotics, analgesics, and various molecules can be delivered to the wound through the chamber. The wound chamber causes no injury to the wound itself or to the surrounding intact skin. Topical delivery of, for instance, antibiotics can provide very high concentrations at the wound site and with a favorable direction of the concentration gradient. A series of 28 wounds in 20 patients were treated with a wound chamber containing saline and antibiotics. Most patients had significant comorbidity and had not responded to conservative or surgical management with débridement and delayed primary closure or skin grafts. Six wounds had foreign bodies present; four of these were joint prostheses. Seven patients were on corticosteroids for rheumatoid arthritis, lupus, or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and four patients had diabetes. Most patients were treated with the wound chamber in preparation for a delayed skin graft or flap procedure, but one was treated with a wound chamber until the wound healed. Twenty-five of the wounds (89 percent) healed, and five wounds (18 percent) required additional conservative management after the initial chamber treatment and grafting procedure. Of the three wounds that did not heal, one healed after additional chamber treatment, one had a skin graft that did not take, and one required reamputation at a higher level. Antibiotic delivery was less than one intravenous dose daily, which avoided the potential for systemic absorption to toxic levels. Antibiotics such as vancomycin and gentamicin could be used in concentrations of up to 10,000 times the minimal inhibitory concentration. Forty-eight hours after application, 20 percent or more of the original antibiotic concentration was present in the wound chamber fluid. In conclusion, the wound chamber provides a safe, powerful tool in the treatment of difficult infected wounds.

Objectives: Standard MRI of the cervical spine is performed in a different anatomical position to that utilised for traditional contrast myelography. Those well practised in myelography are familiar with the considerable changes in configuration of the bony and soft tissues of the cervical spine that may occur with changes in the degree of neck flexion and extension. We set out to compare the findings in a select group of patients with myeloradiculopathy who had undergone myelography and MRI in both standard and neck-extended positions. These findings were correlated with the clinical status. Methods: 29 patients underwent myelography with CT (CTM) and MRI in neutral and neck-extended positions. The imaging was assessed for the degree of cord compression and neural foraminal narrowing, quantified using a simple grading scheme suitable for routine clinical practice. The degree of neck extension was assessed using an angular measurement. Results: For both CTM and MRI, scanning with the neck extended significantly increases the severity of cord compression compared with the standard supine position, to a degree similar to that shown during conventional prone myelography. The degree of perceived cord compression is related to the degree of neck extension achieved. Correlation of standard MRI findings and the clinical level of radiculopathy is poor. This correlation improves when the neck is extended. Conclusions: The most appropriate position for routine MRI of the cervical spine in degenerative disease remains unknown, but in selected patients imaging with the neck extended may provide important additional information. With the introduction of spinal surface coil technology and gradient echo sequences in the late 1980s, MRI rapidly replaced intrathecal contrast myelography as the standard imaging method for assessment of the cervical spinal cord and nerve roots. The two investigations are performed in very different anatomical positions. Standard cervical spine MRI is performed in a coil that is designed to make the patient comfortable, to minimise movement-related artefacts. This generally results in a position of mild extension of the neck. On the other hand, the majority of images for plain cervical myelography are obtained with the patient prone and the neck hyperextended so as to retain myelographic contrast within the cervical lordosis. CT myelography (CTM) is typically performed with the patient supine and with the neck straight or mildly flexed; however, CT myelography can also be performed in the prone position with the neck extended [1].For a number of years we continued to use plain myelography, with CTM as a second-line investigation in patients with cervical myelopathy and/or radiculopathy, when the results of standard MRI were inconsistent with symptoms and signs. More recently we have also performed MRI with neck extension, predominantly in patients with myelopathic features but inconclusive supine MRI. We have been unsure how extended MRI compares with myelography and whether it is able to produce t...

Two MRI strategies which have been reported to be effective in assessing cervical exit foramina, were prospectively compared with CT myelography in 20 patients with cervical radiculopathy. The first strategy utilized 3D T2* images, the second gadolinium enhanced 2D T1 images. Gadolinium (dimeglumine gadopentetate, Schering Ltd) enhanced images did not confer any benefit in the investigation of this condition, probably due to enhancement of herniated disc material and osteophytes adjacent to the neurocentral joint. Three-dimensional (3D) T2* white cerebrospinal fluid images had an accuracy approaching 90% for the diagnosis of foraminal encroachment, compared with a gold standard. MRI including a 3D T2* sequence is thus an acceptable primary investigation for cervical radiculopathy, but when the findings are incompatible with clinical symptomatology, CT myelography is still indicated.

The objective of the study was to assess the long-term efficacy of fluoroscopically-guided cervical nerve root block as a non-surgical treatment for cervical radicular pain. This was a retrospective study of 19 consecutive patients who had undergone cervical nerve root blocks over a period of 18 months, at a regional neurosurgery referral centre in the UK. Two of these patients underwent a second procedure; therefore, the number of total nerve root blocks was 21. Data regarding age, sex and diagnosis were obtained from medical records. MR reports formed the basis for imaging findings. Patients were contacted by telephone and post in order to obtain information about their 'pain relief. This was measured by using a 100-point Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Four points in time were chosen in order to determine the time course of pain relief, i.e. before procedure, at 2 weeks, at 2 months and at 6 months following the procedure. Mean VAS scores at 6 month follow-up were broken up into 3 categories to indicate the level of pain relief. These categories were: VAS decrease of less than 20 points indicating no relief (12 procedures, 57.1%); VAS decrease 20 - 40 points, i.e. moderate relief (three procedures, 14.3%); VAS decrease of greater than 40 points, i.e. significant relief (six procedures, 28.6%). CNRB has limited efficacy for definitive treatment of nerve root pain, but may lead to significant short term relief, in a subgroup of such patients.