A diagnosis of cancer affects not only the patient but also their significant others, especially when a lot of care tasks are involved. Some caregivers perceive the care as a burden, while others consider it a challenge. In this article, findings concerning the impact of cancer caregiving on informal caregivers will be described. No consistent results are reported, and little is known about patterns of caregiving changes in relation to the course of the patient's illness. Attention will be given to factors which have been identified as influencing the course and consequences of caregiving. These factors form the basis of a conceptual research model for caregivers of cancer patients. As cancer progresses, care tasks are generated, which can be perceived by the caregiver as either negative (i.e. burden) or positive. Furthermore, these caregiver experiences may lead to negative as well as positive effects on the caregiver's health and these relationships can be assumed to be bidirectional.
The goal of the present study was to investigate meanings of sexual intercourse in adolescence, and the relationships between meanings, gender, age, and sexual behaviors. Subjects were 201 Italian adolescents (107 boys and 94 girls), aged 14–19 (M = 17.44, SD = 1.65). Participants completed a battery of questionnaires on meanings of sex, sexual activity and other risk behaviors. Using confirmatory factor analyses and ANOVAs, we found:
four dimensions of meanings of sexual intercourse: negative social, personal, transgressional, and positive social meanings;
females scored much lower on all four dimensions;
negative social meanings were related to a lack of protection in sexual intercourse, whereas trangressional meanings were related to lack of protection at the first sexual intercourse only.Our findings suggest a similarity between meanings of sexual intercourse and meanings of others risk behaviors, including smoking. This similarity should be taken into account in prevention against health‐risk behaviors in youth.
This study focuses on the association between psychological factors and TMJ sounds, and the most suitable research design to establish this relation. A traditional research design is simulated to demonstrate how self-report may bias findings. A refined design is presented to obtain unbiased estimates of the role of psychological variables. In the 'naïve' design the importance of psychological variables was overestimated and the role of physiological variables was underestimated. It was concluded that future studies in the aetiology of TMJ clicking should abandon the use of self-report as a proxy for objective findings. With the refined design it was found that psychological factors play only a minor role in the prevalence of TMJ sounds. Findings do not support speculation about mechanisms that relate psychological factors to the presence of TMJ sounds.
Measurement errors in recording temporomandibular joint sounds may originate from variation between observers and from variation in the phenomenon. Laboratory settings enable various procedures to be used to minimize both sources of variation. These procedures yield some excellent intra- and inter-examiner reliabilities, but this does not imply that dentists in a clinical setting are likely to evaluate temporomandibular joint sounds in a comparable way. This study was designed to evaluate clinical joint sound assessment methods (palpation and stethoscopy) without using special precautions to minimize variance. An attempt was made to quantify the signal variance. Within- and between-examiners agreement is estimated for both methods in a sample of 44 non-patients. The results show that two clinically experienced craniomandibular disorders specialists were able to reach fair to good agreement on the identification of (the number of) temporomandibular joint sounds. There was some disagreement with respect to the number of reciprocal clicks. Compared with the palpation technique, stethoscopy is more sensitive, especially with regard to crepitation. Based on the electronically recorded sounds, both examiners appeared to be overconsistent. It is concluded that the use of both palpation and stethoscopy in clinical settings can be justified but that both methods have limitations. When, in a given clinical setting, these limitations are acceptable, there appears to be no need for extra-sensitive but expensive electronic recording devices.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.