Therapeutic doses of glucocorticoids are thought to inhibit prostaglandin and leukotriene formation in humans. Several studies in animals, however, have failed to demonstrate modulation of eicosanoid biosynthesis by steroids in vivo. We administered prednisone (60 mg/day) to eight healthy volunteers and measured eicosanoid formation by a variety of cell types in vivo and ex vivo, using sensitive and specific physicochemical assays. We found that the in vivo course of prednisone failed to inhibit the synthesis of thromboxane A2, prostaglandin 12 (prostacyclin), prostaglanin E2, and leukotriene E4 in vivo and of leukotriene B4 ex vivo. Biosynthesis of leukotriene B4, thromboxane B2, and prostaglandins F2 and E2 by macrophage-rich bronchoalveolar lavage cells was strongly suppressed. These findings indicate that therapeutic regimens of glucocorticoids suppress eicosanoid biosynthesis in human macrophages but not in a number of other cell types with steroid receptors, the capacity for eicosanoid formation, and lipocortin-like material. Study Design. In the 7-day study, the eight subjects took 60 mg of prednisone every morning by mouth for 7 days, the equivalent of 8 times the normal total daily production of hydrocortisone. On both of the 2 days immediately before drug treatment and again on both of the final 2 days of this course, heparinized (20 units/ml) whole blood and 24-hr urine collections were obtained. All blood samples were obtained at the same time of day, which at the end of the study was 2 hr after the preceding dose of prednisone. In four of these eight subjects, bronchoalveolar lavage was also performed, initially 1 week before the start and again at the end of the treatment. In the short-term study, the six subjects took 60 mg of prednisone by mouth at 0800 on two consecutive days. Twenty-four-hour urine collections were obtained before and on the first day of drug treatment and heparinized whole blood was obtained 0,1,2,4,8,24, and 30 hr after the first dose.Plasma prednisone and prednisolone concentrations were measured by HPLC (16). The completion of all urine collections obtained in the study was inferred from the close similarity of total creatinine in the four collections obtained from each subject. Prior to storage at -20°C, aliquots (5 ml)were equilibrated with stable-isotope-labeled standards.Whole blood leukocyte stimulation ex vivo was performed as described (17). Heparinized whole blood was divided into aliquots in polypropylene tubes and stimulants were added as follows: freshly opsonized zymosan A (100 and 250 ,ug/ml), the formylated tripeptide fMet-Leu-Phe (1 and 2 ,tM) in the presence of cytochalasin B (5 ttg/ml), anti-human IgE (1 and 2 ,g/ml), or no added stimulant (17). After incubation at 37°C in a shaking water bath for 30 min, the plasma was immediately collected by centrifugation and aliquots were equilibrated with 5 ng of 2H4-labeled LTB4. 6974The publication costs of this article were defrayed in part by page charge payment. This article must therefore be hereby mark...
The objectives were to determine the efficacy and safety of nasal salmon calcitonin 200 IU daily in the prevention of corticosteroid-induced osteoporosis. A minimized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was carried out in corticosteroid-treated patients with polymyalgia rheumatica. The setting was a tertiary care university-affiliated hospital and a total of 31 patients were enrolled. The primary outcome measure was the percentage change in bone mineral density of the lumbar spine in the two treatment groups from baseline to 1 yr of follow-up. The mean +/- S.D. bone mineral density of the lumbar spine in the calcitonin-treated group decreased by 1.29 +/- 6.76% and in the placebo group by 4.95 +/- 3.50% after 12 months. The observed difference of 3.65 +/- 2.10% between groups is statistically significant (P < 0.05). Nasal salmon calcitonin prevented loss of bone in the lumbar spine as measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.
The prevalence of osteoporosis in men is higher than previously assumed; consequently, numerous therapies are being investigated to treat these patients. The Canadian Database of Osteoporosis and Osteopenia patients (CANDOO) was analyzed to examine changes in bone mineral density (BMD) in consecutively seen osteoporotic men administered alendronate, etidronate or no bone-active drugs (control) over 1 year. A total of 244 men attending six Canadian osteoporosis clinics were included in the study (42 alendronate, 102 etidronate and 100 control). Multiple imputation was used to model missing data to provide a more robust statistical model. The imputed datasets (five) were analyzed using multivariable linear regression to determine differences between groups in the percent change of lumbar spine (LS) and femoral neck (FN) BMD from baseline to 1 year. Differences in the percent change in BMD from baseline were most notable at the LS in favor of alendronate (4.3%; 95% CI: 2.1, 6.6 ) and etidronate (2.1%; 95% CI: 0.3, 4.0) therapy when compared with controls. At the LS, alendronate therapy led to significantly greater (2.2%; 95% CI: 0.2, 4.2) gains in BMD as compared to etidronate therapy. Compared to controls, there were no significant differences in FN BMD with alendronate (2.1%; 95% CI: -0.4, 4.7) or etidronate therapy (0.9%; 95% CI: -1.1, 2.8), nor were there significant differences between bisphosphonate groups (1.3%; 95% CI: -1.1, 3.6, in favor of alendronate). While both alendronate and etidronate significantly increased LS BMD in osteoporotic men after 1 year in real-world settings, alendronate therapy resulted in significantly superior gains in LS BMD. The effect of these two bisphosphonates on fractures and FN BMD in osteoporotic men is likely positive, but requires further study.
We investigated whether an increase in lumbar spine bone mineral density (LS BMD) at 6 months or at 12 months could predict the response to intermittent cyclical therapy (ICT) with etidronate, defined in one of two ways: (i) an increase in LS BMD at 24 months (improvement) or (ii) an increase in LS BMD > or = 0.028 g/cm2 (significant improvement). The latter is a precision term calculated from test-retest values for LS BMD in osteoporotic patients. Two hundred and forty-seven patients (32 men; 5 premenopausal and 210 postmenopausal women) were followed for 24 months by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and were not taking estrogen, calcitonin or fluoride during treatment with ICT-etidronate. One hundred and fifty patients had a LS BMD measurement after 6 months of treatment with ICT-etidronate and 205 patients had one at 12 months. Baseline characteristics (mean;SD) were as follows: age, 66;11 years; years since menopause, 21;10; number of vertebral fractures at baseline, 0.87;1.26; LS BMD T-score, -2.8; 1.2. After 24 months of treatment with ICT-etidronate, 81% of the patients had an improvement, and 55% had a significant improvement at the LS. Only 6% significantly lost bone (loss of 0.028 g/cm2 or more). The mean percent change from baseline in LS BMD was 5.1% (95% confidence interval 4.2% to 6.0%). The results for men and postmenopausal women were similar to those for the entire group. Accuracy and sensitivity were marginally, but not significantly, higher when response was predicted using 12 month versus 6 month LS BMD measurements. The positive predictive values of improvement at 6 or 12 months were 89% and 90% respectively for improvement at 24 months, and 66% and 68% for significant improvement at 24 months. Identification of nonresponders was less successful and similar at 6 months and 12 months. Forty percent and 39% of the patients, who had no improvement at 6 or 12 months respectively, also had no improvement at 24 months, i.e., were true negatives, while 77% and 71% had no significant improvement at 24 months. The results may reflect slow response in a small subgroup of patients rather than nonresponse; however, no response at 1 year might identify patients whose rate of response is sufficiently slow that alternative therapy is justified. These data demonstrate a good response rate to ICT-etidronate and may help reduce the need for follow-up BMD measurements in those who show an early improvement.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.