Glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists (RAs) are an important class of drugs with a well-established efficacy and safety profile in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Agents in this class are derived from either exendin-4 (a compound present in Gila monster venom) or modifications of human GLP-1 active fragment. Differences among these drugs in duration of action (ie, short-acting vs long-acting), effects on glycaemic control and weight loss, immunogenicity, tolerability profiles, and administration routes offer physicians several options when selecting the most appropriate agent for individual patients. Patient preference is also an important consideration. The aim of this review is to discuss the differences between and similarities of GLP-1 RAs currently approved for clinical use, focusing particularly on the properties characterising the single short-acting and long-acting GLP-1 RAs rather than on their individual efficacy and safety profiles. The primary pharmacodynamic difference between short-acting (ie, exenatide twice daily and lixisenatide) and long-acting (ie, albiglutide, dulaglutide, exenatide once weekly, liraglutide, and semaglutide) GLP-1 RAs is that short-acting agents primarily delay gastric emptying (lowering postprandial glucose) and long-acting agents affect both fasting glucose (via enhanced glucose-dependent insulin secretion and reduced glucagon secretion in the fasting state) and postprandial glucose (via enhanced postprandial insulin secretion and inhibition of glucagon secretion). Other advantages of long-acting GLP-1 RAs include smaller fluctuations in plasma drug concentrations, improved gastrointestinal tolerability profiles, and simpler, more convenient administration schedules (once daily for liraglutide and once weekly for albiglutide, dulaglutide, the long-acting exenatide formulation, and semaglutide), which might improve treatment adherence and persistence.
Many people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) fail to achieve glycaemic control promptly after diagnosis and do not receive timely treatment intensification. This may be in part due to 'clinical inertia', defined as the failure of healthcare providers to initiate or intensify therapy when indicated. Physician-, patient- and healthcare-system-related factors all contribute to clinical inertia. However, decisions that appear to be clinical inertia may, in fact, be only 'apparent' clinical inertia and may reflect good clinical practice on behalf of the physician for a specific patient. Delay in treatment intensification can happen at all stages of treatment for people with T2DM, including prescription of lifestyle changes after diagnosis, introduction of pharmacological therapy, use of combination therapy where needed and initiation of insulin. Clinical inertia may contribute to people with T2DM living with suboptimal glycaemic control for many years, with dramatic consequences for the patient in terms of quality of life, morbidity and mortality, and for public health because of the huge costs associated with uncontrolled T2DM. Because multiple factors can lead to clinical inertia, potential solutions most likely require a combination of approaches involving fundamental changes in medical care. These could include the adoption of a person-centred model of care to account for the complex considerations influencing treatment decisions by patients and physicians. Better patient education about the progressive nature of T2DM and the risks inherent in long-term poor glycaemic control may also reinforce the need for regular treatment reviews, with intensification when required.
Background: Exenatide is an incretin mimetic that activates glucagon-like-peptide-1 receptors. It blunts the postprandial rise of plasma glucose by increasing glucose-dependent insulin secretion, suppressing inappropriately high glucagon secretion and delaying gastric emptying. Methods: In seven clinical trials performed in 2845 adult patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus who were inadequately controlled by a sulphonylurea and/or metformin (glycosylated haemoglobin, HbA1c 11%), or by thiazolidinediones (with or without metformin) and treated for periods from 16 weeks to 3 years, exenatide (5 mg b.i.d. s.c. for the first 4 weeks of treatment and 10 mg b.i.d. s.c. thereafter) reduced HbA1c, fasting and postprandial glucose, and body weight dose dependently, and was similar to insulin glargine and biphasic insulin aspart in reducing HbA1c. Body weight diminished with exenatide, whereas it increased with both insulin preparations. Positive effects on the lipid profile and a reduction in C-reactive protein were also recorded with exenatide. Treatment extensions up to 3 years showed that benefits were maintained in the long term. Adverse events were usually mild to moderate in intensity, and generally the frequency decreased with continued therapy. The most common was nausea (whose incidence may be reduced by gradual dose escalation from 5 mg b.i.d. to 10 mg b.i.d.), vomiting, diarrhoea, headache and hypoglycaemia (almost exclusively in patients treated with a sulphonylurea). Results and conclusions: Exenatide is a new, promising therapeutic option for type 2 diabetic patients inadequately controlled by oral agents, before insulin therapy, offering the added benefits of body weight reduction and tight postprandial glucose control.
Obesity is characterized by increased leptin levels and insulin resistance, whereas blunted GH secretion is paired with normal, low, or high plasma IGF-I levels. To investigate body composition in human obesity and the interactions among the GH-IGF-I axis, leptin, and insulin resistance [measured with the homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) score], we studied 15 obese females, aged 23-54 yr (mean age, 42.7 +/- 2.6), with a body mass index (BMI) of 44.02 +/- 1.45 kg/m(2), who underwent treatment by biliopancreatic diversion (BPD), before and after surgery (16-24 months; BMI, 28.29 +/- 0.89 kg/m(2)). Our controls were 15 normal females, aged 28-54 yr (mean age, 40.8 +/- 2.3 yr), with a BMI of 27.52 +/- 0.53 kg/m(2). Insulin and leptin levels and HOMA scores were higher pre-BPD than in the controls. The GH response to GHRH was blunted, with a GH peak and GH area under the curve (AUC) significantly lower than those in controls. IGF-I and IGF-binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3) were also lower than control values. After surgery, BMI, fat mass, lean body mass, HOMA, insulin, and leptin significantly decreased. Furthermore, the GH response to GHRH severely increased; IGF-I and IGFBP-3 levels did not significantly vary. Considering all subjects, correlation analysis showed a strong positive correlation between insulin and leptin, and a negative correlation between insulin and GH peak and between insulin and GH AUC. Regression analysis performed grouping pre- and post-BPD indicated that leptin and GH peak or AUC could best be predicted from insulin levels. The surgical treatment of severe obesity after stabilization of body weight decreases BMI and fat mass while preserving normal lean body mass as well as positively influencing insulin sensitivity and thus aiding the normalization of leptin levels. The insulin reduction may be mainly involved in the increase in the GH response to GHRH through various possible central and peripheral mechanisms while decreasing the peripheral sensitivity to GH itself, as shown by the stable nature of the IGF-I and IGFBP-3 values. Our findings suggest that the changes in insulin levels are the starting point for changes in both leptin levels and the somatotrope axis after BPD.
Adherence to antihyperglycemic medications is often suboptimal in patients with type 2 diabetes, and this can contribute to poor glycemic control, increased hospitalization, and the development of diabetic complications. Reported adherence rates to antihyperglycemics vary widely among studies, and this may be related to differences in methodology for measuring adherence, patient populations, and other factors. Poor adherence may occur regardless of the specific regimen used and whether therapy is oral or injectable, and can be especially common in chronic, asymptomatic conditions, such as type 2 diabetes. More convenient drug-administration regimens and advances in formulations and delivery devices are among strategies shown to improve adherence to antihyperglycemic therapy, especially for injectable therapy. This is exemplified by technological developments made in the drug class of glucagon-like peptide 1-receptor agonists, which are a focus of this narrative review. Dulaglutide, albiglutide, and prolonged-release exenatide have an extended duration of action and can be administered once weekly, whereas such agents as liraglutide require once-daily administration. The convenience of once-weekly versus once-daily administration is associated with better adherence in real-world studies involving this class of agent. Moreover, provision of a user-friendly delivery device has been shown to overcome initial resistance to injectable therapy among patients with type 2 diabetes. This suggests that recent innovations in drug formulation (eg, ready-to-use formulations) and delivery systems (eg, single-dose prefilled pens and hidden, ready-attached needles) may be instrumental in encouraging patient acceptance. For physicians who aim to improve their patients’ adherence to antihyperglycemic medications, it is thus important to consider the patient’s therapeutic experience (treatment frequency, drug formulation, delivery device). Better adherence, powered by recent technological advances in the delivery of glucagon-like peptide 1-receptor agonists, may thus lead to improved clinical outcomes in type 2 diabetes.
None of the available osteoporosis therapies have been shown to completely abolish the risk of fractures. In clinical practice, the outcome may be even poorer. In 880 patients prescribed with antiresorptives (alendronate, risedronate, and raloxifene) for >1 year, a fragility fracture was recorded in 8.9%/year of them. This incidence is considerably higher than that observed in randomized clinical trials, and it was significantly related to poor compliance and lack of supplementation with calcium and vitamin D.Introduction: Osteoporotic fracture is one of the most important public health concerns among the elderly. Currently available therapies have been shown to significantly decrease the risk of fracture, although none of them completely abolishes this risk. In clinical practice, poor treatment response may also result from a number of other factors. Materials and Methods:The Incidence and ChAracterization of inadequate clinical Responders in Osteoporosis (ICARO) is a multicenter, observational study carried out in Italy. It aimed to analyze, in postmenopausal women with established osteoporosis, the risk factors for an "inadequate clinical response" to drug therapy, defined as the occurrence of new vertebral or nonvertebral fragility fractures in patients prescribed, for at least 1 year, alendronate, risedronate, or raloxifene, with a compliance >50%. Results: In 880 patients treated with antiresorptive agents for a median of 2.0 years (95% CI: 1.0-4.5) years, the "inadequate clinical responder (ICR)" subjects over the observation period were 220 (25%), with an annual incidence of 8.9%. ICRs, compared with "adequate clinical responders (ACRs)," had more pretreatment fractures and were treated longer (2.8 versus 1.8 years; p < 0.001). After multiple adjustment for these confounding factors, significant determinants of inadequate clinical response were a poorer treatment compliance and a less frequent co-administration of calcium and vitamin D supplements. Conclusions:The incidence of fractures during treatment with antiresorptive agents in a clinical setting is considerably higher than that observed in randomized clinical trials. Inadequate compliance to treatment and lack of supplementation of calcium and vitamin D are major determinants of this poor response.
Some studies have shown that fetal outcome observed in patients using insulin lispro is much the same as in pregnant women using regular insulin. This study aims to analyze the Italian data emerging from a multinational, multicenter, retrospective study on mothers with type 1 diabetes mellitus before pregnancy, comparing those treated with insulin lispro for at least 3 months before and 3 months after conception with those treated with regular insulin. The data collected on pregnant women with diabetes attending 15 Italian centers from 1998 to 2001 included: HbA1c at conception and during the first and third trimesters, frequency of severe hypoglycemic episodes, spontaneous abortions, mode and time of delivery, fetal malformations and mortality. Seventy-two diabetic pregnancies treated with lispro and 298 treated with regular insulin were analyzed, revealing a trend towards fewer hypoglycemic episodes in the former, who also had a significantly greater reduction in HbA1c during the first trimester. The rate of congenital malformations was similar in the offspring of the two groups of women treated with insulin lispro or regular insulin. These findings suggest that insulin lispro could be useful for the treatment of hyperglycemia in type 1 diabetic pregnant women.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.