No abstract

Inter-observer variation between six pathologists in their application of histological classifications during a survey of cutaneous malignant melanoma was analysed using kappa statistics. The highest levels of adjusted agreement were attained for tumour thickness and the presence of ulceration; intermediate levels were achieved on cross-sectional profile, level of invasion, histogenetic type, solar elastosis and the presence of an associated benign melanocytic lesion; agreement on other histological features of melanoma tended to be relatively poor. The problems experienced in the interpretation of these classifications are discussed and suggestions for their improvement are offered.

A case is described of carcinoid tumor in the skin in which all efforts failed to discover a primary tumor in the internal organs. The possibility that this is a primary cutaneous carcinoid is discussed.

An improved method of analysing interobserver variation in histopathological studies is described and illustrated, by use of data from a congruence survey of malignant melanoma. The method provides, between any number of pathologists, an assessment of overall agreement and of agreement on each individual category of a classification system. Adjustment for differences in chance agreement due to varying numbers of categories or an altered composition of cases is included in the analysis. A generalization of the procedure designed to measure the strength of associations between different categories is formulated and explained with the use of an example.

No abstract