SummaryVery-high-purity Factor VIII concentrates produced by monoclonal or recombinant technology have been postulated to be more antigenic resulting in an increased risk of inhibitor development in hemophilia A patients. However, previous reports, mainly based on prevalence figures, may have understimated the “true” risk of this complication in patients treated with less pure Factor VIII concentrates. The present study, started in 1975, has been designed to calculate the risk of inhibitor development in patients with severe or moderate hemophilia A, followed since their first exposure to intermediate or high-purity Factor VIII concentrates, produced by conventional technologies. Sixty-four hemophiliacs fulfilled the enrollment criteria. Inhibitors developed in 20.3% (13/64) of all patients and in 23% (11/48) of those with severe Factor VIII deficiency. Eleven patients manifested a strong anamnestic response after exposure to Factor VIII (high responders) and 2 had low inhibitor concenlialions despite repeated Factor Vlll infusions (low responders). The incidence of inhibitor development was 24.6 per 1000 patient yeuis of observalion. The, cumulative! risk of inhibitor formation was 19,9% at age of 6 years, and 20.3% at 5 years after the first exposure. The risk was 19.3% at 70 days of exposure to Factor VIII concentrates, and 17.2% after a total of 50,000 units of Factor VIII given.Further stuides are needed to confirm the above risk of acquiring an inhibitor, which indicates and under-estimations by previous studies. In addition, more data is needed to demonstrate whether very high purity Factor VIII concentrates may be more antigenie than conventional preparations.
Inhibitor antibodies to transfused factor VIII pose significant challenges in the management of haemophilia A patients. The main concern is the inefficacy of replacement therapy in patients with high‐titre antibodies, who have a shorter life‐span and a greater morbidity compared to subjects without inhibitors. The ultimate goal in treating these patients is to eliminate the inhibitor antibody entirely, allowing the recommencement of specific replacement therapy. The results of an immune tolerance regimen based on pharmacokinetic parameters are reported here. In 12 high‐responder haemophilia A patients immune tolerance induction (ITI) was attempted with daily administration of factor VIII concentrates of very high purity, either plasma‐derived or produced by recombinant‐DNA technology. Patients were given 100 IU kg–1 day–1 until the inhibitor was shown to be absent by at least two negative assays 1 month apart, with normal recovery of infused factor VIII and normal half‐life (> 6 h), as assessed after a 3‐day washout period. After the patient was judged to be inhibitor‐free, immune tolerance treatment was continued with unmodified factor VIII doses for 2 months. Doses were thereafter gradually reduced and finally, regular prophylaxis by administration of 25 IU kg–1 three times weekly was instituted. Immune tolerance was achieved in 10 of the 12 patients (including six of seven with long‐standing inhibitors) within a median time of 8 months. Outcome of immune tolerance was not influenced by age at start of ITI nor by the interval between inhibitor development and ITI. The success rate and the inhibitor disappearance time of our immune tolerance regimen, utilizing high‐purity factor VIII, agrees with those reported by other investigators.
SummaryHepatitis A vaccination has been recommended to patients with hemophilia since they are exposed to potentially infectious clotting factor concentrates. Aim of this study was to assess the immunogenicity of vaccination in hemophiliacs, infected or not with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). A formalin-inactivated hepatitis A vaccine was injected subcutaneously to 113 susceptible adults and children and repeated after 1 and 6 months. 47 vaccinees were anti-HIV positive (28 asymptomatic, 15 with CD4 cell counts of less than 200/pl and 4 with symptomatic disease). The first dose of vaccine induced seroconversion, with antibody titers of at least 20 mlU/ml, in 89% of the 66 anti-HIV negative patients, 100% of them responding after the second injection. In anti-HIV positive hemophiliacs seroconversion rates and antibody titers were significantly lower than in non-infected patients. After 12 months, only 76% of anti-HIV positive vaccinees and 40% of those with signs of HIV disease progression maintained the antibody, whereas all anti-HIV negative patients had titers of 20 mlU/ml or more. Our results indicate that there is an association between defective response to hepatitis A vaccine and stage of progression of HIV disease.
Randomized and cohort studies have provided evidence confirming the hypothesis, based on in-vitro observations, that the use of very high-purity factor VIII (FVIII) concentrates, either immuoaffinity chromatography purified or produced by recombinant DNA technology, may slow immunological deterioration in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected haemophiliacs, while high-purity concentrates, produced by ion-exchange chromatography, did not produce a benefit. Even though these data clearly indicate that very high-purity concentrates should be preferred for the replacement therapy of HIV-positive haemophiliacs, there are little data, based on direct comparison, supporting the use of very high-purity concentrates rather than high-purity preparations, which are less expensive. In an attempt to address this issue, we prospectively compared CD4 cell counts and changes of clinical status in 18 HIV-positive haemophiliacs, randomly assigned either to receive the treatment with a very high-purity FVIII concentrate, purified by immunoaffinity chromatography, or a high-purity product, produced by ion-exchange chromatography. All patients had CD4 lymphocyte counts below 300 μL(-1) , were negative for the hepatitis B surface antigen and the HIV p24 antigen, and were receiving antiretroviral treatment with Zidovudine for at least 6 months. There were no significant changes of CD4 cell counts over the 96-week follow-up period or between the two groups. No signficant differences between the two groups were detected in the occurrence of AIDS-defining diagnoses (one in each group). On the whole, no striking benefit is conferred to the immune status of asymptomatic HIV-positive haemophiliacs by using either of these high-purity and very high-purity FVIII concentrates for 96 weeks. Larger prospective randomized trials are needed to establish definitely whether it is necessary to resort to very high-purity concentrates or it is sufficient to use high-purity concentrates to slow the fall of CD4 cell counts that occurs in HIV-positive haemophiliacs. Randomized trials, based on clinical end-points, are also needed to demonstrate whether slowing the fall in CD4 cells results in clinical benefits, delaying the occurrence of AIDS.
Pathophysiologic considerations as well as non-comparative clinical results suggest that very high purity concentrates may slow immunologic deterioration in human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected hemophiliacs. In an attempt to evaluate this hypothesis, we prospectively compared CD4 cell counts, skin testing responses, and changes of the clinical status in 20 asymptomatic HIV-positive hemophiliacs, randomly assigned to continue the treatment with an intermediate purity concentrate or to receive a very high purity product, purified by immunoaffinity chromatography with monoclonal antibodies. In the group switched to the very high purity concentrate there was no significant change of the CD4 cell counts over the 96-week follow-up period, whereas in the group continued on the intermediate purity concentrate, a highly significant decline was detected (P less than .013). Furthermore, in the very high purity group, four of six anergic patients at entry acquired reactivity to skin testing. The results of this study clearly support the use of very high purity concentrates for the replacement therapy of HIV-infected hemophiliacs.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.