Since diverticulitis and mechanical anastomosis are risk factors for anastomotic stenosis, surgeons should take this into account when they are considering what type of anastomotic technique to utilize.
The aim of this study was to analyze the incidence of ureteral stenosis in a life-supporting human decay-accelerating factor (hDAF) transgenic pig-to-cynomolgus monkey kidney transplantation model and determine the role of possible immunological events in its pathogenesis. Thirty consecutive bi-nephrectomized cynomolgus monkeys received a kidney from hDAF transgenic pigs with or without a ureteral stent. Four monkeys were euthanized prematurely after transplantation. In the remaining 26 cases, the mean survival was 24 +/- 19 days. Except in one case, there was a close relationship between ureter and kidney in terms of type and severity of rejection. There were six ureteral stenoses; five were repaired by stent positioning and resurgery extended survival for an additional 16 +/- 10 days. The stenotic ureters showed diffuse acute humoral xenograft rejection (AHXR), while all cases with no or only focal signs of ureteral rejection never revealed ureteral obstruction. Use of a ureteral stent extends the survival of a xenografted primate, thereby helping to clarify the immunological events surrounding the onset of AHXR in kidneys in long-term xenograft recipients.
Laparoscopic drainage of posttransplantation lymphocele is a relatively simple method for treating this complication, although it bears the burden of an increased incidence of urinary tract lesions, as confirmed by a review of the literature. The major advantage of the laparoscopic approach is the absence of postoperative ileus with the opportunity to continue the enteral immunosuppressive regimen and a lower recurrence rate. These data suggest that laparoscopic lymphocele treatment might be considered the therapy of choice, provided the iatrogenic lesions of the urinary tract diminish as more experience with this technique is gained.
The protective effect of oxygen free radical scavenger superoxide dismutase (SOD) against the warm ischemic damage that occurs in kidneys harvested from non-heart-beating donors is controversial because of its short half-life. In this model, we compared the protective effect of SOD and two longer lasting polyethylene glycol (PEG)-linked forms of SOD in a model of renal ischemia induced by 60 min of arterial clamping in rats. Rats treated with PEG1-SOD and PEG2-SOD had a better renal function than controls, with significantly lower serum creatinine levels throughout the follow-up period and a significantly higher creatinine clearance on postoperative days 1, 2, and 4. In native SOD treated-rats, serum creatinine was lower than in controls, though not significantly so, and creatinine clearance was significantly higher on postoperative day 4. Our results indicate that the protective effect of SOD against renal warm ischemia can be enhanced by prolonging its half-life by binding the enzyme to PEG.
Hamster-to-rat heterotopic cardiac xenotransplantation is widely used as an experimental model to study xenograft rejection, accommodation, and tolerance, as well as in studies aimed at developing immunosuppressive strategies in xenotransplantation. Despite its widespread application, no detailed description of a surgical technique for this model has been provided in the literature. Indeed, all publications so far on the use of this species combination refer to the rat allotransplantation technique. Hence the present paper provides a detailed, up-to-date description of the surgical method adopted at our center for the hamster-to-rat heterotopic cardiac xenotransplantation model. Considerable effort went into developing a reliable, reproducible experimental model in rodents, and the description given here is enriched with "tips" that we learned in the process. The discussion of the technique also addresses several significant related issues, e.g., the anesthesia and organ preservation solution used (aspects that, in our experience, are crucial to a good surgical outcome).
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.