Millions of domestic and wild European rabbits (Oryctolagus cuniculus) have died in Europe, Asia, Australia and New Zealand during the past 17 years following infection by Rabbit haemorrhagic disease virus (RHDV). This highly contagious and deadly disease was first identified in China in 1984. Epidemics of RHDV then radiated across Europe until the virus apparently appeared in Britain in 1992. However, this concept of radiation of a new and virulent virus from China is not entirely consistent with serological and molecular evidence. This study shows, using RT-PCR and nucleotide sequencing of RNA obtained from the serum of healthy rabbits stored at 4 mC for nearly 50 years, that, contrary to previous opinions, RHDV circulated as an apparently avirulent virus throughout Britain more than 50 years ago and more than 30 years before the disease itself was identified. Based on molecular phylogenetic analysis of British and European RHDV sequences, it is concluded that RHDV has almost certainly circulated harmlessly in Britain and Europe for centuries rather than decades. Moreover, analysis of partial capsid sequences did not reveal significant differences between RHDV isolates that came from either healthy rabbits or animals that had died with typical haemorrhagic disease. The high stability of RHDV RNA is also demonstrated by showing that it can be amplified and sequenced from rabbit bone marrow samples collected at least 7 weeks after the animal has died.

JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org.. British Ecological Society is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Journal of Applied Ecology. Summary 1. Data on fecundity and mortality obtained from wild rabbit Oryctolagus cuniculus populations in England were used in Leslie Matrix population projections to examine rate of population growth and the effect of time of control on population growth. 2. The population growth rate was shown to be slightly greater than unity in an average year. 3. Control policies which remove more adults than juveniles are best performed at the end of December and policies which remove more juveniles than adults are best performed in mid-June. 4. The limitations of the model used are discussed, as are limitations in the data. It was concluded that more information was required on natural mortality rates, especially fot the first few weeks of life.

Predation has usually been interpreted as being a compensatory mortality factor, removing only the doomed surplus. The literature on the wild Rabbit Oryctolagus cuniculus L. is reviewed to collate counter-evidence for a regulating influence of predation. This evidence is almost entirely circumstantial, not experimental. Predation has been reported to extend the length of time Rabbit populations remain low following a significant reduction of Rabbits by some other agent. Rabbit populations have been shown to increase very rapidly when predator density has suddenly been reduced. It has been suggested that predators affect the spread and dispersion of Rabbits both at the geographical and local levels. Predation has not, however, been shown to have an important influence at high Rabbit densities. Thus, its role can be that of a limiting factor rather than a density-dependent regulatory mortality factor.The concept of predator pressure is presented and discussed, pointing out that there is currently no standard technique used for its measurement.Further evidence on the importance of predation is presented from four recent studies in England and Wales that relate, by association, the distribution and abundance of local Rabbit populations to the local attitude towards predators. Rabbits were found to be significantly more widespread and abundant where predators were removed (not restricted to keepered game estates) or at low density, than when predators were undisturbed or at a high density. The significance of these results is discussed.The circumstantial and corroborative evidence leads strongly to the conclusion that predator pressure can act as an additive rather than compensatory mortality factor in some circumstances, and can thus be a potential regulating factor. Predation is more likely to be a limiting factor at low Rabbit density however, since a density-dependent relationship has not been demonstrated throughout the range of Rabbit densities that occur. This requires experimental demonstration to determine the threshold pressure below which predation becomes limiting. If so, reductions in Rabbit populations by short-term control operations could allow natural predation to help maintain low Rabbit densities for several years in some habitats. Conversely, the implications for Rabbit populations and thus crop damage resulting from predator control (e.g. in game management regimes) should be appreciated.

With the exception of virus strains Ashington and RCV, other recognised strains of Rabbit haemorrhagic disease virus (RHDV) share relatively close genetic homology. Using serology and phylogenetic analysis, we have identified a third disparate virus lineage in healthy rabbits on Lambay Island off the east coast of Eire, where disease due to RHDV has never been observed. ELISA tests revealed high titre RHDV-specific antibodies in 81% of the sera from 11 healthy rabbits captured on this island, indicating that the virus is actively circulating amongst these rabbits. Nevertheless, infectious virus has not been isolated from rabbits living on this island. The detection of antibodies and the disparate Lambay virus lineage in an apparently healthy and isolated wild rabbit population provides the most convincing evidence yet that at least some strains of RHDV can circulate harmlessly for long periods of time in wild rabbits possibly by producing persistent or latent infections.

The information on population structure, fluctuations, natality, mortality, and spatial distribution of wild Harvest mouse populations is reviewed from the published literature. In addition, information gathered during a recent live trapping study is brought forward to provide both corroborative and new evidence to increase the knowledge of the demography of this species. Populations are characterized by high reproductive rate and low survival rate. Harvest mice populations undergo great changes in density, both seasonally and from year to year. Adult females produce normally one or two litters during their lifetime. Reproduction is achieved by the young of the year and four generations may breed within one breeding season. Climatic factors control the length of the breeding season in addition to affecting greatly (coupled with predation) the length of life. Survival is low, the longest lived individuals survive only one winter. Harvest mice have been shown, on the basis of live trapping, to live within small home ranges and several of these may overlap.