Background: Several observational studies have shown that magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is significantly more sensitive than mammography for screening women over age 25 at high risk for hereditary breast cancer; however, MRI is more costly and less specific than mammography. We sought to determine the extent to which the low sensitivity of mammography is due to greater breast density. Methods: Breast density was evaluated for all patients on a high-risk screening study who were diagnosed with breast cancer between November 1997 and July 2006. Density was measured in two ways: qualitatively using the four categories characterized by the Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System and quantitatively using a computer-aided technique and classified as (a) V10%, (b) 11% to 25%, (c) 26% to 50%, and (d) >50% density. Comparison of sensitivity of mammography
Background: After an initial diagnosis of breast cancer, the risk of contralateral breast cancer is approximately 0.5% per year. Annual mammography is recommended to identify local recurrences and contralateral new primaries. Because the sensitivity of mammography tends to be lower in younger women, we conducted a retrospective review of the method of detection and pathologic stage of metachronous contralateral primary breast cancers according to age at diagnosis in a cohort of breast cancer patients. Methods: The Henrietta Banting Database contains information on cases of breast cancer diagnosed at Women’s College Hospital from 1987 to 2004. From among 1992 women in the database, 71 patients were identified who were initially diagnosed before age 60 and who subsequently developed a contralateral breast cancer. Medical records were obtained for 53 of the 71 patients. Results: Of the 53 contralateral cancers, 33 (62%) were detected by mammography, including 4 in 16 patients (25%) diagnosed before age 50 and 29 in 37 patients (78%) diagnosed at age 50 or older (p ≤ 0.001). Conclusions: Mammography has poor sensitivity for the surveillance of contralateral breast cancer in early-onset breast cancer patients. Other imaging modalities should be evaluated in this setting.
11009 Background: Annual mammography is currently the gold standard for surveillance of breast cancer survivors for both ipsilateral recurrence and contralateral new primaries. The risk of either of these events occurring has been found to be inversely proportional to age and is at least 1% per year if breast cancer was diagnosed before age 50. (Chen et al 1999) (Komoike et al 2006). However, the sensitivity of screening mammography is significantly lower in young women. We therefore sought to determine the effectiveness of surveillance mammography according to age of diagnosis using a prospective database. Methods: The Henrietta Banting Database prospectively follows all new cases of operable breast cancer diagnosed from 1987 - 2004 at Women’s College Hospital. From the 1992 women in the database, we selected all patients diagnosed before age 60 who subsequently developed non-metastatic contralateral cancers (n=71 ) or ipsilateral recurrences (n=11 ). Records were obtainable for 59 of these 82 patients. Results: Method of detection and stage of diagnosis are listed in table below for the 59 patients according to age of diagnosis of second cancers. Overall, mammography was less effective at detecting contralateral and recurrent breast cancers in younger women, detecting only 24% of these cancers in women under 50 compared to 74% in patients 50 and older (Chi-Square, p<0.001). In addition, 77% of patients under 50 whose second cancers were detected by methods other than mammography had negative surveillance mammograms in the 15 months prior to diagnosis. Conclusion: Since mammography detected only 24% of second primary breast cancers/ recurrences in survivors < age 50 and almost one third of all detected cancers were locally advanced, more sensitive imaging modalities such as breast MRI should be considered for surveillance of young survivors. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.