Background
To determine whether severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2, the cause of COVID-19 disease) exposure in pregnancy, compared to non-exposure, is associated with infection-related obstetric morbidity.
Methods
We conducted a multicentre prospective study in pregnancy based on a universal antenatal screening program for SARS-CoV-2 infection. Throughout Spain 45 hospitals tested all women at admission on delivery ward using polymerase-chain-reaction (PCR) for COVID-19 since late March 2020. The cohort of positive mothers and the concurrent sample of negative mothers was followed up until 6-weeks post-partum. Multivariable logistic regression analysis, adjusting for known confounding variables, determined the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) of the association of SARS-CoV-2 infection and obstetric outcomes. Main outcome measures: Preterm delivery (primary), premature rupture of membranes and neonatal intensive care unit admissions.
Results
Among 1009 screened pregnancies, 246 were SARS-CoV-2 positive. Compared to negative mothers (763 cases), SARS-CoV-2 infection increased the odds of preterm birth (34 vs 51, 13.8% vs 6.7%, aOR 2.12, 95% CI 1.32–3.36, p = 0.002); iatrogenic preterm delivery was more frequent in infected women (4.9% vs 1.3%, p = 0.001), while the occurrence of spontaneous preterm deliveries was statistically similar (6.1% vs 4.7%). An increased risk of premature rupture of membranes at term (39 vs 75, 15.8% vs 9.8%, aOR 1.70, 95% CI 1.11–2.57, p = 0.013) and neonatal intensive care unit admissions (23 vs 18, 9.3% vs 2.4%, aOR 4.62, 95% CI 2.43–8.94, p < 0.001) was also observed in positive mothers.
Conclusion
This prospective multicentre study demonstrated that pregnant women infected with SARS-CoV-2 have more infection-related obstetric morbidity. This hypothesis merits evaluation of a causal association in further research.
Research Question: Is there an association between SARS-CoV-2 infection and firsttrimester miscarriage?Design: Multicenter prospective study of a cohort of first-trimester miscarriages registered consecutively by seven Spanish hospitals, where universal PCR screening for SARS-CoV-2 infection was implemented for both, miscarriages and deliveries. The incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection among first-trimester miscarriages was compared to the one registered in women at admission on delivery ward within the same timeframe using a mixed-effects Poisson regression analysis, considering hospital as random effect. On the other hand, the characteristics of SARS-CoV-2 positive and negative patients who miscarried were compared through two-sided univariable analyses.Results: 301 miscarriages were registered, 11 (3.7%) SARS-CoV-2 infected and 290 non-infected. No differences in terms of SARS-CoV-2 infection incidence were observed between miscarriages and deliveries [1,936 deliveries were registered at the same time of miscarriages and 44 (2.3%) were SARS-CoV-2 infected] (p= 0.233). Regarding the differences observed between SARS-CoV-2 positive and negative patient miscarriages, more inevitable miscarriages occurred in the group of infected women (36.4% vs 16.5% in non-infected, p= 0.004), as well as more surgical management of miscarriages (27.3% vs 8.2% in non-infected, p= 0.036), which is probably in line with the greater number of inevitable miscarriages observed in this group.Conclusions: No association between SARS-CoV-2 infection and risk of first-trimester miscarriage has been observed; however, the type of miscarriage seems to be different between SARS-CoV-2 positive and negative women, with inevitable miscarriage being more frequent among infected women.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.