Introduction: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is common in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). It is unknown if hospital-acquired AKI (HA-AKI) and community-acquired AKI (CA-AKI) convey a distinct prognosis. Methods: The study aim was to evaluate the incidence and risk factors associated with both CA-AKI and HA-AKI. Consecutive patients hospitalized at a reference center for COVID-19 were included in this prospective cohort study. Results: We registered 349 (30%) AKI episodes in 1,170 hospitalized patients, 224 (19%) corresponded to CA-AKI, and 125 (11%) to HA-AKI. Compared to patients with HA-AKI, subjects with CA-AKI were older (61 years [IQR 49–70] vs. 50 years [IQR 43–61]), had more comorbidities (hypertension [44 vs. 26%], CKD [10 vs. 3%]), higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (2 points [IQR 1–4] vs. 1 point [IQR 0–2]), and presented to the emergency department with more severe disease. Mortality rates were not different between CA-AKI and HA-AKI (119 [53%] vs. 63 [50%], p = 0.66). In multivariate analysis, CA-AKI was strongly associated to a history of CKD (OR 4.17, 95% CI 1.53–11.3), hypertension (OR 1.55, 95% CI 1.01–2.36), Charlson Comorbidity Index (OR 1.16, 95% CI 1.02–1.32), and SOFA score (OR 2.19, 95% CI 1.87–2.57). HA-AKI was associated with the requirement for mechanical ventilation (OR 68.2, 95% CI 37.1–126), elevated troponin I (OR 1.95, 95% CI 1.01–3.83), and glucose levels at admission (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.02–1.08). Discussion/Conclusions: CA-AKI and HA-AKI portend an adverse prognosis in CO­VID-19. Nevertheless, CA-AKI was associated with a higher comorbidity burden (including CKD and hypertension), while HA-AKI occurred in younger patients by the time severe multiorgan disease developed.

Objective. To develop a score to predict the need for ICU admission in COVID-19.Methods. We assessed patients admitted to a COVID-19 center in Mexico. Patients were segregated into a group that required ICU admission, and a group that never required ICU admission. By logistic regression, we derived predictive models including clinical, laboratory, and imaging findings. The ABC-GOALS was constructed and compared to other scores.Results. We included 329 and 240 patients in the development and validation cohorts, respectively. One-hundred-fifteen patients from each cohort required ICU admission. The clinical (ABC-GOALSc), clinical+laboratory (ABC-GOALScl), clinical+laboratory+image (ABC-GOALSclx) models area under the curve were 0.79 (95%CI=0.74-0.83) and 0.77 (95%CI=0.71-0.83), 0.86 (95%CI=0.82-0.90) and 0.87 (95%CI=0.83-0.92), 0.88 (95%CI=0.84-0.92) and 0.86 (95%CI=0.81-0.90), in the development and validation cohorts, respectively. The ABC-GOALScl and ABC-GOALSclx outperformed other COVID-19 and pneumonia predictive scores.Conclusion. ABC-GOALS is a tool to timely predict the need for admission to ICU in COVID-19.

Objective To evaluate the role of urinary epidermal growth factor (EGF) as a biomarker of chronic kidney damage in lupus nephritis (LN). Methods A proteomics approach was used to identify urinary EGF as a biomarker of interest in a discovery cohort of patients with LN. The expression of urinary EGF was characterized in 2 large multiethnic LN cohorts, and the association between urinary EGF levels at the time of flare and kidney outcomes was evaluated in a subset of 120 patients with long‐term follow‐up data. For longitudinal studies, the expression of urinary EGF over time was determined in 2 longitudinal cohorts of patients with LN from whom serial urine samples were collected. Results Discovery analysis showed the urinary EGF levels as being low in patients with active LN (median peptide count 8.4, interquartile range [IQR] 2.8–12.3 in patients with active LN versus median 48.0, IQR 45.3–64.6 in healthy controls). The peptide sequence was consistent with that of proEGF, and this was confirmed by immunoblotting. The discovery findings were verified by enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay. Patients with active LN had a significantly lower level of urinary EGF compared to that in patients with active nonrenal systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), patients with inactive SLE, and healthy kidney donors (each P < 0.05). The urinary EGF level was inversely correlated with the chronicity index of histologic features assessed in kidney biopsy tissue (Spearman’s r = −0.67, P < 0.001). Multivariate survival analysis showed that the urinary EGF level was associated with time to doubling of the serum creatinine level (DSCr), a marker of future end‐stage kidney disease (ESKD) (hazard ratio 0.88, 95% confidence interval 0.77–0.99, P = 0.045). Patients whose LN symptoms progressed to DSCr and those who experienced progression to ESKD had a lower urinary EGF level at the time of flare, and urinary EGF levels decreased over the 12 months following flare. All patients who experienced progression to ESKD were identified based on a urinary EGF cutoff level of <5.3 ng/mg. Conclusion Urinary EGF levels are correlated with histologic kidney damage in patients with LN. Low urinary EGF levels at the time of flare and decreasing urinary EGF levels over time are associated with adverse long‐term kidney outcomes.

Objectives. COVID-19 pandemic poses a burden on hospital resources and intensive care unit (ICU) occupation. This study aimed to provide a scoring system that, assessed upon first-contact evaluation at the emergency department, predicts the need for ICU admission. Methods.We prospectively assessed patients admitted to a COVID-19 reference center in Mexico City between March 16 th and May 21 st , and split them into development and validation cohorts. Patients were segregated into a group that required admission to ICU, and a group that never required ICU admission and was discharged from hospitalization. By logistic regression, we constructed predictive models for ICU admission, including clinical, laboratory, and imaging findings from the emergency department evaluation. The ABC-GOALS score was created by assigning values to the weighted odd ratios. The score was compared to other COVID-19 and pneumonia scores through the area under the curve (AUC). Results. We included 569 patients divided into development (n=329) and validation (n=240) cohorts. One-hundred-fifteen patients from each cohort required admission to ICU. The clinical model (ABC-GOALSc) included sex, obesity, the Charlson comorbidity index, dyspnea, arterial pressure, and respiratory rate at triage evaluation. The clinical plus laboratory model (ABC-GOALScl) added serum albumin, glucose, lactate dehydrogenase, and S/F ratio to the clinical model. The model that included imaging (ABC-GOALSclx) added the CT scan finding of >50% lung involvement. The model AUC were 0.79 (95%CI 0.74-0.83) and 0.77 (95%CI 0.71-0.83), 0.86 (95%CI 0.82-0.90) and 0.87 (95%CI 0.83-0.92), 0.88 (95%CI 0.84-0.92) and 0.86 (95%CI 0.81-0.90) for the clinical, laboratory and imaging models in the development and validation cohorts, respectively. The ABC-GOALScl and ABC-GOALSclx scores outperformed other COVID-19 and pneumonia-specific scores.Conclusion. The ABC-GOALS score is a tool to evaluate patients with COVID-19 at admission to the emergency department, which allows to timely predict their risk of admission to an ICU.

No abstract