SUMMARYCats and dogs being treated at two veterinary clinics were investigated for gastrointestinal carriage of Clostridium difficile using selective solid and enrichment media. Thirty-two (39 5 %) of 81 stool samples yielded C. difficile. There were significant differences in isolation rates between clinics, 610 % of animals being positive at one clinic compared to 17-5 % at the other (Chi-square, P < 0005). Of 29 animals receiving antibiotics, 15 (52-0 %) harboured C. difficile while 11 (23 9 %) of 46 animals not receiving antibiotics were positive (Chi-square, P < 00 1). There was no difference in carriage rate between cats (38 1 %) and dogs (40 0 %). The environment at both veterinary clinics was surveyed for the presence of C. difficile. Fifteen of 20 sites at one clinic were positive compared to 6 of 14 sites at the other clinic. Both cytotoxigenic and noncytotoxigenic isolates of C. difficile were recovered from animals and environmental sites. These findings suggest that household pets may be a potentially significant reservoir of infection with C. difficile.

Recent reports have implicated ciprofloxacin as a cause of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhoea. This problem was examined in three ways. First, the MIC of ciprofloxacin for C. difficile was determined. The MIC range was 8-32 mg/L, with C. difficile were 'treated' with ciprofloxacin and clindamycin in a test-tube, and the growth of C. difficile monitored. The clindamycin-treated emulsions supported growth of C. difficile, while the ciprofloxacin-treated and control emulsions did not differ significantly and failed to support the growth of C. difficile. Finally, 213 patients on ciprofloxacin monotherapy were investigated. Twenty-nine patients were given ciprofloxacin as treatment for diarrhoea, while a further 15 patients developed diarrhoea while being treated. None of these 44 patients harboured C. difficile. Faecal samples from 73 of the remaining 169 patients who did not have or develop diarrhoea were investigated for C. difficile, but none was positive. It was concluded that ciprofloxacin is unlikely to promote C. difficile-associated diarrhoea.

It is generally accepted that most patients with Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhoea acquire the organism from the environment. Recently we demonstrated that household pets may constitute a significant reservoir of C. difficile through gastrointestinal carriage in up to 39% of cats and dogs. These findings suggested that direct transmission from household pets, or contamination of the environment by them, may be a factor in the pathogenesis of C. difficile-associated diarrhoea. To investigate this possibility, we examined isolates of C. difficile from humans, pets and the environment by restriction enzyme analysis (REA) and restriction fragment length polymorphism (RFLP) typing using enhanced chemiluminescence. Both REA and RFLP typing methods used Hind III digests of chromosomal DNA. A total of 116 isolates of C. difficile from pets (26), veterinary clinic environmental sites (33), humans (37) and hospital environmental sites (20) was examined. REA was far more discriminatory than RFLP typing and for all isolates there were 34 REA types versus 6 RFLP types. There was good correlation between the REA types found in isolates from pets and from the veterinary clinic environment, and between isolates from humans and from those found in the hospital environment. There was, however, no correlation between REA type of C. difficile found in pets and isolates of human origin. We conclude that there may still be a risk of humans acquiring C. difficile from domestic pets as these findings may be the result of geographical variation.