BackgroundSarcopenia is associated with poor clinical outcomes in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC). Currently, the diagnostic criteria for sarcopenia are complex and laborious. Increased evidence suggests the inflammatory state of the body is closely associated with the development of sarcopenia. The systemic immune-inflammatory index (SII) and the prognostic nutritional index (PNI) are representative blood indicators of the status of the systemic inflammatory response, but the clinical significance of the combined testing of these two indicators remains unclear. We aimed to develop a simple and practical risk score (SII-PNI score) to screen patients with LAGC for sarcopenia on admission for early diagnosis.MethodsWe registered a prospective clinical study from January 2011 to May 2016 involving 134 patients with LAGC undergoing radical surgical resection. All patients followed the definition of sarcopenia in the Asian Working Group on Sarcopenia (AWGS) guidelines and were divided into sarcopenia and non-sarcopenia groups. SII-PNI score 0–2 was scored as 2 for high SII (≥432.9) and low PNI ( ≤ 49.5); score 1, either high SII or low PNI; score 0, no high SII or low PNI.ResultsAll patients underwent radical surgery, including 31 patients (23.13%) with sarcopenia according to AWGS criteria. The SII-PNI score was significantly lower in the non-sarcopenic patients than in the sarcopenic patients (p < 0.001). Logistic multivariate analysis showed that the SII-PNI score predicted an independent prognostic factor for sarcopenia (p < 0.001). Patients with high SII-PNI scores had significantly worse prognosis than those with low SII-PNI scores (p < 0.001). The SII-PNI score was an independent prognostic factor for predicting overall survival and disease-free survival (p = 0.016, 0.023).ConclusionPeripheral blood parameters SII-PNI scores accurately identify sarcopenia in patients with LAGC and could be used as potential systemic markers.
BackgroundIt is well known that sarcopenia is a common risk factor in patients with gastrointestinal tumours, which may negatively affect the clinical outcome and prognosis. Recent studies suggest that serum creatinine-cystatin C (Cr/CysC) ratio may be associated with sarcopenia, but this association lacks sufficient evidence in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GIST). Therefore, this study aimed to investigate whether the Cr/CysC ratio was associated with sarcopenia and recurrence-free survival (RFS) in patients with GIST.Materials and methodsThe study retrospectively analysed 413 patients with GIST who underwent surgical resection from January 2016 to January 2020. The serum Cr/CysC ratio was determined as a proxy for sarcopenia by comparing it with various biomarkers and Cox multifactorial analysis was used to determine the relationship between Cr/CysC ratio and prognosis.ResultsSerum Cr/CysC was positively correlated with skeletal muscle area (SMA) (r = 0.256, p < 0.001), skeletal muscle index (SMI) (r = 0.300, p < 0.001), and hand grip strength (HGS) (r = 0.251, p < 0.001). The area under the receiver operator characteristic curve for sarcopenic subjects with serum Cr/CysC ratio was significantly greater than other biomarkers (Cr/CysC: 0.840, CysC: 0.732, Cr: 0.518). The optimal cut-off value for Cr/CysC was 0.65, and patients in the high Cr/CysC group had a higher 3-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) than those in the low Cr/CysC group (92.72 vs. 72.46%, p < 0.001). Cox multifactorial analysis found that the Cr/CysC ratio was an independent risk factor for RFS in GIST patients (HR = 2.143, 95% CI: 1.431–5.459, p = 0.011).ConclusionSerum Cr/CysC ratio has satisfactory and comparable diagnostic accuracy, and prognostic value for sarcopenia in patients with GIST. Therefore, it can be a simple and practical clinical tool to screen sarcopenia in GIST patients. However, further studies are required to validate these findings.
364 Background: RESOLVE study shows clinically meaningful improvement in perioperative SOX in patients with locally advanced GC/GEJC undergoing D2 gastrectomy. Addition of PD-1 inhibitor to chemotherapy shows significant clinical benefit in first-line treatment of advanced GC/GEJC. This trial was designed to compare the perioperative sintilimab combined with SOX versus perioperative SOX in patients with resectable locally advanced GC/GEJC. Methods: PERSIST is a multicenter, prospective, open-label, randomized-controlled phase II study. Patients with histologically or cytologically confirmed GC/GEJC, clinical stage II-III, no previous systemic treatment, ECOG performance status (PS) of 0 or 1 were eligible for inclusion. Patients will be randomized (1:1) to received either perioperative sintilimab (200 mg d1 Q3W, three cycles preoperatively and up to 1 year postoperatively) in combined with SOX (oxaliplatin 130 mg/m² d1, oral S-1 40–60 mg BID d1-14 Q3W, three cycles preoperatively and five cycles postoperatively) in experimental group or perioperative SOX alone in control group. The primary endpoint was the pCR rate. The secondary endpoints were the MPR rate, down-staging rate, 3-years DFS rate, 5-years OS rate, safety. The study is registered with Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04982939. Results: As of September 2022, 101 patients were enrolled, with median age 61 years (range 31-75 years), males 85 (84.2%), cT2/3/4/X 2(2.0%)/5(5.0%)/93(92.1%)/1(1.0%), cN0/1/2/3/X 10(10.0%)/42(41.6%)/27(26.7%)/9(8.9%)/13(12.9%), and GC/GEJC 92(91.1%)/9(8.9%). Forty-seven patients (experimental group:26, control group:21) underwent radical resection and all achieved R0 resection. The pCR rates in the experimental group and control group were 26.9% (95%CI 11.6%-47.8%) and 4.8% (95%CI 0.1%-23.8%), respectively. The MPR rates in the experimental group and control group were 69.2% (95%CI 48.2%-85.7%) and 28.6% (95%CI 11.3%-52.2%), respectively. 76.9% (20/26) and 52.4% (11/21) patients achieved down-staging in the experimental group and control group. Three patients developed grade 3–4 surgical complications. Grade 3–4 TRAEs included thrombocytopenia (4.0%), anemia (3.0%), neutropenia (2.0%), allergic reaction (2.0%), pneumonia (1.0%), myocardial infarction (1.0%). The median postoperative hospital stay in the experimental and control group were 10 days (range 7-38 days) and 11 days (range 7-66 days). Conclusions: Compared to SOX chemotherapy alone, sintilimab combined with SOX resulted in an encouraging pCR rate, MPR rate and downstaging rate as perioperative treatment for resectable locally advanced GC/GEJC, and safety was manageable. Clinical trial information: NCT04982939 .
Sarcopenia is commonly defined as the age-related loss of muscle mass and function and may be caused by several factors, such as genetics, environmental conditions, lifestyle, drug use, and, in particular, comorbidities. People with pre-existing conditions are more likely to develop sarcopenia and subsequently have a less favorable prognosis. Recently, phase angle (PhA), which is derived from bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA), has received a great deal of attention, and numerous studies have been carried out to examine the relationship between PhA and sarcopenia in different conditions. Based on these studies, we expect that PhA could be used as a potential marker for sarcopenia in the future.
ObjectiveThis study aimed to develop prognostic prediction models for patients with Siewert type II/III adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG) who received neoadjuvant therapy (neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy or neoadjuvant chemotherapy) and radical surgery. A baseline nomogram and a post-operative nomogram were constructed before neoadjuvant therapy and after surgery. The predictive performance of the constructed nomograms was internally validated and compared to the TNM staging system.Materials and MethodsA total of 245 patients diagnosed with Siewert type II/III AEG and treated with neoadjuvant therapy followed by radical surgery at The Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University between January 2011 and December 2017 were enrolled. The variables before neoadjuvant therapy were defined as baseline factors, while the variables of baseline factors along with the variables of treatment and postoperative pathology were defined as post-operative factors. To construct the corresponding nomograms, independent predictors of baseline and post-operative factors were identified. The C-index and a time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curve were used to evaluate the model’s discrimination ability. The calibration ability of the model was determined by comparing the probability of predicted free-recurrence to the actual free-recurrence. Decision curve analysis (DCA) was used to determine the clinical usefulness of the nomogram.ResultsAmong the baseline factors, age, cT stage, cN stage, Borrmann type, and staging laparoscopy were independent prognostic predictors. In contrast, among the post-operative factors, age, cN stage, staging laparoscopy, ypT stage, clinical response, number of positive lymph nodes, number of negative lymph nodes, laurén classification, and lymphatic, or perineural invasion (VELPI) were independent prognostic predictors. The two nomograms were constructed using the independent predictors of prognosis. The C-indexes for the baseline and post-operative nomograms were 0.690 (95% CI, 0.644-0.736) and 0.817 (95% CI, 0.782-0.853), respectively. The AUCs of the baseline nomogram at 3 and 5 years were both greater than cTNM (73.1 vs 58.8, 76.1 vs 55.7). Similarly, the AUCs of the post-operative nomogram were both greater than ypTNM (85.2 vs 69.1, 88.2 vs 71.3) at 3 and 5 years. The calibration curves indicated that both models had a high degree of calibration ability. By comparing the DCA at 3 and 5 years, we determined that the two nomograms constructed had better clinical utility than the TNM staging system.ConclusionsThe constructed nomograms have a more accurate predictive ability than the eighth edition TNM staging system, which can be useful for treatment selection and follow-up monitoring of patients.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.