Quantitative analysis of patient anatomical features and their correlation with OAR dose sparing has identified a number of important factors that explain significant amount of interpatient DVH variations in OARs. These factors can be incorporated into evidence-based learning models as effective features to provide patient-specific OAR dose sparing goals.

For intermediate and high risk prostate cancer, both the prostate gland and seminal vesicles are included in the clinical target volume. Internal motion patterns of these two organs vary, presenting a challenge for adaptive treatment. Adaptive techniques such as isocenter repositioning and soft tissue alignment are effective when tumor volumes only exhibit translational shift, while direct re-optimization of the intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plan maybe more desirable when extreme deformation or differential positioning changes of the organs occur. Currently, direct re-optimization of the IMRT plan using beamlet (or fluence map) has not been reported. In this study, we report a novel on-line re-optimization technique that can accomplish plan adjustment on-line. Deformable image registration is used to provide position variation information on each voxel along the three dimensions. The original planned dose distribution is used as the 'goal' dose distribution for adaptation and to ensure planning quality. Fluence maps are re-optimized via linear programming, and a plan solution can be achieved within 2 min. The feasibility of this technique is demonstrated with a clinical case with large deformation. Such on-line ART process can be highly valuable with hypo-fractionated prostate IMRT treatment.

Purpose:To build a statistical model to quantitatively correlate the anatomic features of structures and the corresponding dose-volume histogram (DVH) of head and neck (HN) Tomotherapy (Tomo) plans. To study if the model built upon one intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) technique (such as conventional Linac) can be used to predict anticipated organs-at-risk (OAR) DVH of patients treated with a different IMRT technique (such as Tomo). To study if the model built upon the clinical experience of one institution can be used to aid IMRT planning for another institution. Methods: Forty-four Tomotherapy intensity modulate radiotherapy plans of HN cases (Tomo-IMRT) from Institution A were included in the study. A different patient group of 53 HN fixed gantry IMRT (FG-IMRT) plans was selected from Institution B. The analyzed OARs included the parotid, larynx, spinal cord, brainstem, and submandibular gland. Two major groups of anatomical features were considered: the volumetric information and the spatial information. The volume information includes the volume of target, OAR, and overlapped volume between target and OAR. The spatial information of OARs relative to PTVs was represented by the distance-to-target histogram (DTH). Important anatomical and dosimetric features were extracted from DTH and DVH by principal component analysis. Two regression models, one for Tomotherapy plan and one for IMRT plan, were built independently. The accuracy of intratreatment-modality model prediction was validated by a leave one out cross-validation method. The intertechnique and interinstitution validations were performed by using the FG-IMRT model to predict the OAR dosimetry of Tomo-IMRT plans. The dosimetry of OARs, under the same and different institutional preferences, was analyzed to examine the correlation between the model prediction and planning protocol. Results: Significant patient anatomical factors contributing to OAR dose sparing in HN Tomotherapy plans have been analyzed and identified. For all the OARs, the discrepancies of dose indices between the model predicted values and the actual plan values were within 2.1%. Similar results were obtained from the modeling of FG-IMRT plans. The parotid gland was spared in a comparable fashion during the treatment planning of two institutions. The model based on FG-IMRT plans was found to predict the median dose of the parotid of Tomotherapy plans quite well, with a mean error of 2.6%. Predictions from the FG-IMRT model suggested the median dose of the larynx, median dose of the brainstem and D2 of the brainstem could be reduced by 10.5%, 12.8%, and 20.4%, respectively, in the Tomo-IMRT plans. This was found to be correlated to the institutional differences in OAR constraint settings. Re-planning of six Tomotherapy patients confirmed the potential of optimization improvement predicted by the FG-IMRT model was correct. The institutional clinical experience was incorporated into the model which allows the model from one institution to generate a reference plan for another ...

This paper describes the algorithm and examines the performance of an intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) beam-angle optimization (BAO) system. In this algorithm successive sets of beam angles are selected from a set of predefined directions using a fast simulated annealing (FSA) algorithm. An IMRT beam-profile optimization is performed on each generated set of beams. The IMRT optimization is accelerated by using a fast dose calculation method that utilizes a precomputed dose kernel. A compact kernel is constructed for each of the predefined beams prior to starting the FSA algorithm. The IMRT optimizations during the BAO are then performed using these kernels in a fast dose calculation engine. This technique allows the IMRT optimization to be performed more than two orders of magnitude faster than a similar optimization that uses a convolution dose calculation engine. Any type of optimization criterion present in the IMRT system can be used in this BAO system. An objective function based on clinically-relevant dose-volume (DV) criteria is used in this study. This facilitates the comparison between a BAO plan and the corresponding plan produced by a planner since the latter is usually optimized using a DV-based objective function. A simple prostate case and a complex head-and-neck (HN) case were used to evaluate the usefulness and performance of this BAO method. For the prostate case we compared the BAO results for three, five and seven coplanar beams with those of the same number of equispaced coplanar beams. For the HN case we compare the BAO results for seven and nine non-coplanar beams with that for nine equispaced coplanar beams. In each case the BAO algorithm was allowed to search up to 1000 different sets of beams. The BAO for the prostate cases were finished in about 1-2 h on a moderate 400 MHz workstation while that for the head-and-neck cases were completed in 13-17 h on a 750 MHz machine. No a priori beam-selection criteria have been used in achieving this performance. In both the prostate and the head-and-neck cases, BAO is shown to provide improvements in plan quality over that of the equispaced beams. The use of DV-based objective function also allows us to study the dependence of the improvement of plan quality offered by BAO on the DV criteria used in the optimization. We found that BAO is especially useful for cases that require strong DV criteria. The main advantages of this BAO system are its speed and its direct link to a clinical IMRT system.

Currently, most intensity-modulated radiation therapy systems use dose-volume (DV)-based objectives. Although acceptable plans can be generated using these objectives, much trial and error is necessary to plan complex cases with many structures because numerous parameters need to be adjusted. An objective function that makes use of a generalized equivalent uniform dose (gEUD) was developed recently that has the advantage of involving simple formulae and fewer parameters. In addition, not only does the gEUD-based optimization provide the same coverage of the target, it provides significantly better protection of critical structures. However, gEUD-based optimization may not be superior once dose distributions and dose-volume histograms (DVHs) are used to evaluate the plan. Moreover, it is difficult to fine-tune the DVH with gEUD-based optimization. In this paper, we propose a method for combining the gEUD-based and DV-based optimization approaches to overcome these limitations. In this method, the gEUD optimization is performed initially to search for a solution that meets or exceeds most of the treatment objectives. Depending on the requirements, DV-based optimization with a gradient technique is then used to fine-tune the DVHs. The DV constraints are specified according to the gEUD plan, and the initial intensities are obtained from the gEUD plan as well. We demonstrated this technique in two clinical cases: aprostate cancer and ahead and neck cancer case. Compared with the DV-optimized plan, the gEUD plan provided better protection of critical structures and the target coverage was similar. However, homogeneities were slightly poorer. The gEUD plan was then fine-tuned with DV constraints, and the resulting plan was superior to the other plans in terms of the dose distributions. The planning time was significantly reduced as well. This technique is an effective means of optimizing individualized treatment plans.

With the era of big data, the utilization of machine learning algorithms in radiation oncology is rapidly growing with applications including: treatment response modeling, treatment planning, contouring, organ segmentation, image-guidance, motion tracking, quality assurance, and more. Despite this interest, practical clinical implementation of machine learning as part of the day-to-day clinical operations is still lagging. The aim of this white paper is to further promote progress in this new field of machine learning in radiation oncology by highlighting its untapped advantages and potentials for clinical advancement, while also presenting current challenges and open questions for future research. The targeted audience of this paper includes newcomers as well as practitioners in the field of medical physics/radiation oncology. The paper also provides general recommendations to avoid common pitfalls when applying these powerful data analytic tools to medical physics and radiation oncology problems and suggests some guidelines for transparent and informative reporting of machine learning results.

The aims of this paper are to describe a method of splitting large intensity-modulated fields that cannot be delivered as a single field and to verify the accuracy of our method. Some multi-leaf collimators may be operated in the dynamic mode to deliver intensity-modulated radiation treatments (IMRT) using the 'sliding window' technique. In this technique each pair of leaves sweeps over the treatment field while the beam is on. However, there are limitations on the width of the field that can be treated due to the limited length of the leaves. For instance, the leaf length of the Varian MLC is 14.5 cm. Since each leaf pair must travel from the left boundary to the right boundary of the beam aperture, the maximum width of the field aperture that can be accommodated in one sweep of leaves is also limited to 14.5 cm, in fact to a slightly smaller value. It has been shown that IMRT is more efficient when used to plan and deliver the large and boost fields simultaneously. In such situations, the fields must be large enough to cover simultaneously the volumes of the gross tumour, microscopic disease and electively treated regions. Such field sizes are often larger than 14.5 cm wide. In this paper, we present a dynamic 'feathering' technique to split the large intensity-modulated fields into smaller fields. In this technique, the component beams overlap each other by a small amount, and the intensity in the overlap region gradually decreases for one field component and increases for the other. The sum of intensities remains the same as for the original field. This method eliminates the field matching problems associated with the conventional step 'break' for static fields. The splitting process is integrated into the IMRT treatment procedure and the entire planning process is automated. Comparison of dose distributions calculated and measured in a phantom showed good agreement. Such a method can be applied to the 'step and shoot' technique as well. IMRT fields of widths up to 25 cm can be delivered by splitting only once, which is adequate for most treatments.

A new Novalis Tx system equipped with a high definition multileaf collimator (HDMLC) recently became available to perform both image-guided radiosurgery and conventional radiotherapy. It is capable of delivering a highly conformal radiation dose with three energy modes: 6 MV photon energy, 15 MV photon energy, and 6 MV photon energy in a stereotactic radiosurgery mode with 1000 MU/min dose rate. Dosimetric characteristics of the new Novalis Tx treatment unit with the HDMLC are systematically measured for commissioning. A high resolution diode detector and miniion-chamber detector are used to measure dosimetric data for a range of field sizes from 4 x 4 mm to 400 x 400 mm. The commissioned Novalis Tx system has passed the RPC stereotactic radiosurgery head phantom irradiation test. The Novalis Tx system not only expands its capabilities with three energy modes, but also achieves better beam conformity and sharer beam penumbra with HDMLC. Since there is little beam data information available for the new Novalis Tx system, we present in this work the dosimetric data of the new modality for reference and comparison.