Background The results of skin and blood allergen testing are not consistently relevant to clinical manifestations in allergic patients. Objective The aim of the study was to investigate the relationship between severity of allergic rhinitis and different allergen diagnostic tests in Dermatophagoides species-sensitized patients. Methods Study subjects included 65 rhinitis patients-50 with Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus (DP) sensitization (DP+) and 15 without DP sensitization (DP-), and 15 DP+ and 37 DP- healthy controls (HCs) confirmed by allergen skin prick (SPT) and blood specific immunoglobulin E (sIgE) tests. The Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (RQLQ) was tested. All subjects underwent DP nasal provocation test (DP-NPT). Visual analogue scoring (VAS) of nasal symptoms and nasal airway resistance (NAR) were measured before and after NPT. Correlations between the 3 allergen tests and score of RQLQ were performed. Results All rhinitis subjects had significantly higher VAS and NAR after DP-NPT than HCs ( P < .01). All DP+ rhinitis, 40% of DP- rhinitis subjects, 13.3% of DP+ HCs and 0% of DP- HCs had positive DP-NPT. Dose of positive DP-NPT positively correlated with SPT diameter and sIgE level in all tested subjects ( P < .001). Score of RQLQ positively correlated with dose of DP-NPT ( P < .001), but not with SPT diameter and sIgE level in rhinitis patients. Conclusion Although DP nasal provocation, skin prick wheal size and blood sIgE level correlate with each other, only nasal provocation testing is associated with severity of nasal symptoms. It is suggested that NPT should be performed to verify a clinically relevant allergy.

Purpose It remains unknown whether allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT) could attenuate airway inflammatory response triggered by allergen exposure. Methods We performed Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus ( Der-p ) nasal provocation tests (NPTs) in allergic rhinitis (AR) and/or asthma patients without AIT (non-AIT), or at 16, 52, 104, or 156 weeks after Der-p AIT. Rhinitis and asthma visual analog scale (VAS; VAS of nasal symptoms [VAS-NS], VAS of asthma symptoms), the rhinoconjunctivitis quality of life questionnaire (RQLQ), nasal lavage, sputum induction, fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), nasal airway resistance, pulmonary function, and airway hyperresponsiveness were performed before and after NPT. Results Non-AIT subjects demonstrated significantly higher VAS-NS before and after NPT compared to AIT subjects ( P < 0.05). NPT response was positive in 14 (100%) non-AIT, 7 (70%) 16 weeks-AIT, 6 (60%) 52 weeks-AIT, 6 (60%) 104 weeks-AIT, and 2 (20%) 156 weeks-AIT subjects. The NPT grade significantly correlated with AIT duration and baseline RQLQ score ( r = −0.561, P < 0.001 and r = 0.525, P < 0.001, respectively). Sputum and nasal lavage eosinophil count, and FeNO in non-AIT subjects were significantly increased 6 hours after NPT ( P < 0.05). AIT subjects did not change their sputum or nasal lavage eosinophil count before and after NPT. Subjects with 156 weeks-AIT demonstrated significantly lower levels of sputum and nasal lavage eosinophil count before and after NPT when compared with non-AIT patients ( P < 0.05). Sputum eosinophil counts positively correlated with nasal lavage eosinophil counts at baseline and 6 hours after NPT ( r = 0.719, P = 0.006 and r = 0.823, P < 0.001, respectively) in non-AIT patients. Conclusion Our results show that AIT can attenuate both upper and lower airway immune response to nasal allergen exposure in patients with AR and/or asthma.

Background: Allergen nasal challenge can induce increase of eosinophils in sputum, but report about eosinophilic inflammation in upper airway after allergen bronchial challenge in Chinese asthmatics was rare. The article aims to evaluate response of upper and lower airways to house dust mite (HDM) allergen bronchial challenge. Methods: HDM allergen bronchial challenge was carried out in asthmatic patients with allergic rhinitis (AR). Bronchial methacholine challenge and blood test were performed before and at 24 hours after allergen challenge. Nasal lavage and induced sputum for differential cells count and fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) measurement were performed before, 7 and 24 hours after allergen challenge.Results: Eighteen asthmatic patients with AR underwent HDM allergen bronchial challenge with no serious adverse events reported. Fifteen patients showed dual asthmatic response (DAR), while 2 patients showed early (EAR) and 1 late asthmatic response (LAR) only. At 24 hours after allergen bronchial challenge testing, average PC 20 FEV 1 to methacholine significantly decreased (1.58 to 0.81 mg/mL, P=0.03), while both FeNO and the percentage of eosinophils in blood and sputum were significantly increased [52.0 (54.0) to 69.0 (56.0) ppb, P=0.01; 4.82% to 6.91%, P<0.001; 20.70% to 27.86%, P=0.03, respectively], but with no significant differences found in the percentage of eosinophils in nasal lavage (39.36% to 38.58%, P=0.89). However, at 7 hours after allergen challenge, the eosinophils in sputum were significant increased to 40.45% (P<0.001), but there was an increase (39.36% to 48.07%) with no statistical difference (P=0.167) found in nasal lavage. Conclusions: HDM allergen bronchial challenge induced different response of airway inflammation in upper and lower airways.

Background: Sanfeng Tongqiao Diwan has shown the potential to alleviate acute, recurrent, and chronic rhinitis in adults based on available studies. However, the evidence for its application in upper airway cough syndrome (UACS) is unclear. The purpose of this study was thus to investigate the efficacy and safety of Sanfeng Tongqiao Diwan in the treatment of UACS.Methods: This was a single-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. A total of 60 patients who satisfied the inclusion criteria were randomly divided into experimental and placebo groups in a 1:1 ratio. The experimental group was given Sanfeng Tongqiao Diwan, and the placebo group was given a simulant for 14 consecutive days. The follow-up period was 15 days. The primary outcome was the total effective rate. The secondary outcomes included clinical efficacy, visual analogue scale (VAS) of related symptoms, and Leicester Cough Questionnaire in Mandarin-Chinese (LCQ-MC) scores before and after the treatment. Additionally, the safety was also evaluated. Results:The total effective rate in the experimental group was 86.6% (26/30), which was significantly higher than the 7.1% (2/28) in the placebo group (difference 79.6; 95% CI: 57.0 to 89.1; P<0.001). Nasal congestion, runny nose, cough, postnasal drip, and overall symptoms in the experimental group were significantly lower than those in the placebo group after treatment (3.7±1.5 vs. 5.0±1.1, 3.6±1.3 vs. 5.9±1.1, 3.8±1.2 vs. 6.8±1.3, 3.5±1.4 vs. 6.1±1.5, 3.8±2.0 vs. 7.3±1.4, respectively; all P values <0.001). After treatment, the LCQ-MC score in the experimental group was significantly higher than that in the placebo group (all P values <0.001). The blood eosinophil count in the placebo group was significantly higher after treatment than before treatment (P=0.037). No abnormalities were found in liver or renal indicators during the treatment period in the 2 groups, and no adverse reactions occurred.Conclusions: Sanfeng Tongqiao Diwan improved the symptoms and living quality of patients with UACS and showed acceptable safety. The results of this trial represent rigorous clinical evidence for the application of Sanfeng Tongqiao Diwan and further support a new option in UACS treatment.