Our results may provide more deep insight into the mechanism and a promising therapeutic target. The next step is to put our emphasis on an experiment level and to verify the novel genes from 13 hub genes.

No abstract

Purpose It is an open question whether cell transplantation can provide safety and effective outcome to spinal cord injury (SCI) patient which has remained controversial for almost 40 years. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of cell transplantation in SCI patients. Method Studies of the cell transplantation for SCI were retrieved from PubMed, Embase, Medline, Cochrane Library and analyzed quantitative data by Review Manager 5.3.Results Twenty-one clinical controlled studies with 973 patients were included. The pooled results suggested that cell transplantation significantly improved ASIA score, ASIA motor score, ASIA sensory score, Barthel Index score, residual urine volume, rehabilitative time of automatic micturition. Furthermore, subgroup analysis indicated that the stem cells exhibited more potent than the non-stem cells in spinal cord repair. Cell transplantation at more than 14 days after injury showed more significant improvements than that within 14 days from injury. The dosage of cell transplantation between 1-5 × 10 7 and 10-20 × 10 7 was the potent quantity for the patient with SCI. Intrathecal injection and intravenous + intrathecal injection showed more superior to the other method. The top 5 adverse events were febrile reaction (11.5%), neurologic pain (11.3%), headache (2.6%), neurologic deterioration (2.4%), and rigidity or spasticity (1.6%). Conclusion Cell transplantation appears to be a safe therapeutic strategy possessing substantial beneficial effects in the patients with SCI in clinic. Moreover, treating SCI with stem cell, the dosage of cells between 1-5 × 10 7 and 10-20 × 10 7 , in intermediate or chronic phase, minimally invasive techniques, may bring more advantage to SCI patient.

No abstract

BackgroundPlasma-derived β-amyloid, tau, and neurodegeneration (ATN) biomarkers can accurately diagnose Alzheimer’s disease (AD) and predict its progression. Few studies have investigated the relationship between plasma biomarkers and changes in plasma inflammatory markers in clinically diagnosed AD.MethodsSeventy-four participants were recruited, including 30 mild-to-moderate AD dementia patients and 44 normal controls (NC). All participants underwent neuropsychological testing and blood sampling for biomarker testing. AD was clinically diagnosed according to the National Institute on Aging-Alzheimer’s Association (NIA-AA) core criteria and required age-mismatched hippocampal atrophy. We performed Single Molecule Array (Simoa), an ultra-sensitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA), to examine plasma ATN markers, including β-amyloid (Aβ) 40, Aβ42, p-tau181, total (t)-tau, neurofilament protein light chain (NfL), and inflammatory factors (TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, and IL-8).ResultsThe level of the plasma Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio was significantly declined and the levels of the plasma p-tau181, NfL and TNF-α were significantly higher in the AD group than the NC group, but there was no significant difference in the levels of plasma t-tau, IL-1β, IL-6, and IL-8 between the AD and NC groups. The levels of plasma p-tau181, NfL, Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio, and TNF-α were all associated with impairments in multiple cognitive domains. Among them, the plasma Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio, and the p-tau181 and TNF-α levels were associated with impairments in global cognition, memory, and visuospatial abilities, but not with executive function, only plasma NfL level was associated with executive function. Plasma NfL showed higher diagnostic performance in AD than in NC individuals (AUC = 0.833). A combined diagnostic prediction model of plasma Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio, p-tau 181, and NfL had the highest value than each factor alone (AUC = 0.902),with a sensitivity and specificity of 0.867 and 0.886, respectively.ConclusionThe levels of plasma ATN biomarkers (Aβ42/Aβ40 ratio, p-tua181, and NfL) were significantly changed in clinically diagnosed AD patients and they all associated with different domains of cognitive impairment. Plasma ATN biomarkers better differentiate mild-to-moderate AD dementia from NC when they are incorporated into diagnostic models together rather than individually. Plasma ATN biomarkers have the potential to be a screening tool for AD. However, the expression of inflammatory factors in AD patients requires further research.