Defoliant spraying is an important aspect of mechanized cotton harvesting. Fully and uniformly spraying defoliant could improve the quality of defoliation and reduce the impurity content in cotton. Improving the coverage of defoliant droplets in the middle and lower layers of cotton and ensuring the full and even dispersion of droplets in the cotton canopy are essentially in increasing the defoliation effect. In this study, we assessed the effect of aviation spray adjuvants on droplet deposition, defoliation, boll opening and defoliant retention in cotton leaves sprayed by an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV). The results showed that adding aviation spray adjuvants could significantly improve the defoliant droplet deposition. Fifteen days after spraying, the defoliation rate was 80.31% and the boll opening was 90.61%. The defoliation rate increased by 3.12–34.62% and the boll opening rate increased by 6.67–29.56% after the addition of aviation spray adjuvants. Using a vegetable oil adjuvant could significantly increase the droplet coverage rate and the retention of defoliants in cotton leaves.

Processing pepper planting and processing have become an important red pillar industry in Xinjiang. With the continuous growth of processing pepper planting areas in Xinjiang, diseases and pests are increasing year by year. The aim of this study was to compare the droplet deposition and control efficiency of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) and electric air-pressure knapsack (EAP) sprayers on a processing pepper field. The UAV sprayer had a poor droplet coverage rate, droplet density, and deposition uniformity, but displayed the best deposition (1.01 μg/cm2, which was 98% more than the EAP sprayer). The control efficacy of the UAV sprayer on processing pepper fields with Phytophthora capsici and aphids was slightly lower than that of the EAP sprayer. When the UAV sprayer was used to control processing pepper diseases and pests, it could reduce the pesticide dosage on the premise of ensuring the control effect. Further study of the residue of high concentration pesticides in pepper fruit and environment sprayed by UAVs are needed.

Defoliant spraying is an important aspect of the mechanized processing of pepper harvesting. Complete and uniform spraying of defoliant could improve the quality of defoliation and reduce the impurity content in processing pepper. In this study, we assessed the effect of aerial spraying of adjuvants on physicochemical properties of defoliant solution and droplet deposition when using an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) for defoliation spraying. The results showed that Puliwang was a better aerial spray adjuvant suitable for spraying defoliants for processing pepper using UAVs, with a higher defoliation rate and better droplet deposition. Although the YS-20 adjuvant had a higher droplet deposition amount (0.72 μg/cm2) in the middle layer, its performance was poor in droplet size, density, and coverage. The size and density of the droplets added with the Manniu were basically the same as the Puliwang, even the distribution uniformity was better (the CV of the upper canopy layer was only 33.6%), but the coverage rate was poor. In the treatment with AS-901N, there was no marked increase in droplet size, so evaporation and drift were not improved, eventually resulting in a lower defoliation rate. Puliwang had the highest comprehensive score, followed by AS-910N, YS-20, and Manniu.

As a new low volume sprayer, unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) application is developing quickly worldwide. Alkyl ethyl sulfonate soluble concentrate is a kind of spray adjuvants for defoliants, which is widely used in cotton defoliant application. The aim of this study was to compare the droplet deposition, defoliation and boll opening of a UAV added with six dosages of alkyl ethyl sulfonate on the cotton. Addition with 4.2 g a.i./hm 2 (one-sixtieth of the recommended dosage in the field) alkyl ethyl sulfonate could significantly increase the droplets coverage rate, and improve defoliation and boll opening effects. Added with lower dosage alkyl ethyl sulfonate (4.2 g a.i./hm 2 and 8.4 g a.i./hm 2), the droplet distribution uniformity was much better than that of moderate (84 g a.i./hm 2) and high dosage (252 a.i./hm 2) of alkyl ethyl sulfonate. It could not only ensure the effects of defoliation and boll opening, but also reduce the environmental pollution by alkyl ethyl sulfonate.