In recent years, with the gradual establishment of the socialist legal system in China, the construction of legal system is tending toward perfection. But the actual operating effects of law enforcement are relatively not ideal. Social group disputes occurred frequently. In this paper, three typical litigation disputes between the state-owned coal enterprises and farmers caused by coal mining are taken as examples to elaborate the concrete practice process of the law in the litigation disputes. In order to explain the inner logic of legal practice in specific disputes, the external conditions, the internal mechanism and deep motivation in the disputes which influenced the legal practice process are analyzed. Finally its concluded that the consideration of legal effect and political power operation determines legal judgments in these litigation disputes, furthermore, explains legal practice process in specific disputes.
In recent years, with the establishment and perfection of legal system, the building of the legal system has attained considerable achievements, but the actual operational results of law enforcement show out ineffective, various related disputes resolution mechanism needs to be established and perfected. Disputes between the state-owned coal enterprises and farmers are interests disputes between specific bodies, as there are typical performance and character in the litigation resolution mechanism of disputes between the state-owned coal enterprises and farmers, therefore its necessary to analyze and elaborates the motivators, operation mechanism and outcomes consideration of litigation which is contained in the process of litigation resolution.
The disputes between the state-owned coal enterprises and mine surrounding farmers are gradually highlighted social problems which affect social stability and local economic development. This paper mainly analyze these disputes based on the perspective of the state-owned coal mine enterprises, by means of elaborating the interests expression, action orientation and behavioral pattern of farmers in the disputes, try to explain the pattern, skills and method taken by the enterprises in the dispose of disputes, and then analyze the three logics including mollification patter, disintegration skills and cooperation method in the disputes which the enterprises followed with to solve problems. Finally, conclusion is the logics in the dispose of disputes which the enterprises taken are determined by the characteristic of disputes practice.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.