We read the recent published paper in this journal of J Gastrointest Oncol by Zhang and colleagues entitled "Secondary colon cancer in patients with ulcerative colitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis" (1). They performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the correlation between ulcerative colitis (UC) and colon cancer. We appreciate Zhang et al. (1) for the valuable study, however, after a careful learning of the literature, several limitations should be noticed.First, in the results section of the abstract, Zhang et al.(1) performed the meta-analysis by random-effect model because of statistical heterogeneity (Chi 2 =103.10; I 2 =90%; P<0.00001) and found that there were no significant differences between colon cancer in patients with UC and patients without colon carcinoma (Z =12.44; P<0.00001). However, we believe the interpretation of the results was false. There should be significant difference due to P<0.00001.Second, in the statistical methods section of this article, Zhang et al. (1) stated that the odds ratio (OR) was used as an effect size for dichotomous variables. Whereas, in this meta-analysis, the effect size actually was relative risk (RR) showed in figures 5,6 and the OR was not reported in the study. Therefore, we believe the irrelevant effect size depicted would lead to misunderstanding.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.