Sensitivity to music reward varies across individuals. The Barcelona Music Reward Questionnaire (BMRQ) is an effective tool in the assessment of sensitivity to music reward. The current study investigated the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the BMRQ, including its internal consistency, factor structure, criterion-related validity, and measurement invariance across gender. In addition, the relationship between personality traits and sensitivity to music reward was explored. A total of 1,120 Chinese undergraduate students completed a pen-and-paper version of the BMRQ, either in individual sessions or in class groups. Confirmatory factor analysis indicated a good fit for the revised model of the BMRQ. In addition, good internal consistency reliability of the overall scale and criterion-related validity with the BIS/BAS scale were also supported in this study. Evidence of configural, metric, and scalar invariance supported its measurement invariance across gender. On this basis, women in our sample reported themselves more sensitive than men to music reward. Results also showed that the personality traits Openness to Experience and Agreeableness were the strongest contributors to music reward sensitivity, while Extraversion did not make a significant contribution. These findings may provide a reference point for therapists wishing to predict the efficacy of music therapy for individuals.

The COVID Stress Scales (CSS) was used to access related distress concerning Corona Virus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). Based on China's epidemic prevention and control policies during the COVID-19 pandemic, the adaption of the Chinese version of the CSS was developed. Our study evaluated the reliability and validity of the Chinese adapted version of the CSS during the COVID-19 pandemic. An online survey was employed to construct a national sample of 2,116 participants in Chinese mainland. We examined the factor structure, internal consistency, convergent validity, discriminant validity, and concurrent validity. The results demonstrated that the six-factor solution for the Chinese adaptation of the CSS proved a good fit with the data after comparing the factor structure with the five-factor model. The six-factor model had good reliability and supported good convergent, discriminant, and concurrent validity of the CSS Chinese adaption. Overall, our findings supported the Chinese adapted version of the CSS as a psychometrically sound measure of stress during the COVID-19 pandemic in China.

Objectives: To identify the optimal factor structure of the behavioral inhibition system/behavioral activation system (BIS/BAS) scales and to examine measurement invariance (MI) of the scales across gender among a sample of Chinese undergraduate students.Methods: Convenience sampling was employed to recruit 1,085 subjects. Participants completed the Chinese version of the BIS/BAS scales. A confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) of competing models was conducted to determine the optimal factor model, followed by a test of MI across gender based on the optimal model.Results: A single-group CFA indicated that the modified four-factor structure fits best in the total sample. Multiple-group CFAs demonstrated that configural invariance, weak invariance, strong invariance, and strict invariance models of the four-factor structure of the BIS/BAS scales were all acceptable.Conclusion: The four-factor structure of the Chinese version of the BIS/BAS scales possesses MI across gender.

No abstract

Background: Despite the changing landscape of treatment of chronic lymphoma leukemia (CLL) and in contrast to the large number of quality of life (QoL) and psychosocial studies in patients with solid tumors, relatively few studies have reported QoL in patients with CLL. This study aims to assess depression, anxiety, stress and QoL in a Chinese CLL cohort. Patients and Methods: Taking advantage of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 accompanying CLL-specific module QLQ-CLL17 questionnaire and DASS-21 questionnaire, a total of 50 Chinese patients with CLL completed self-reported questionnaires from December 2019 to July 2021, assessing the level of depression, anxiety, stress and QoL. Results: Among the 50 CLL patients, 34 patients were male. The median age was 57 (22-77) years old. 66% of the patients were uncertain about the staging of the disease. 36% of the patients were uncertain about therapeutic implications of CLL. According to EORTC QLQ-C30, patients had low level of physical functioning, role functioning, emotional functioning, cognitive functioning and social functioning were 80%, 32%, 68%, 66%, 64%, respectively. Patients in active-treatment group had significantly lower level of physical function than "watch and wait" group (90% vs. 65%, P=0.03). The proportion of patients with cognitive problems was significantly higher in female patients than in male patients (93.8% vs. 52.9%, P=0.004). According to QLQ-CLL17, patients with symptom burden, physical condition and worries about health were 94% (47/50), 86% (43/50), 98% (48/50). Patients under 60 years old had higher scores for worries about health than patients older than 60. According to DASS-21 questionnaire, 86% of the patients had depression symptomatic scores (mild grade: 2%, medium grade: 52%, severe grade: 20%, very severe grade: 12%). 84% of the patients had anxiety symptomatic scores ( mild grade: 6%, medium grade: 14%, severe grade: 30%, very severe grade: 34%). 64% of the patients had stress symptomatic scores ( mild grade: 18%, medium grade: 22%, severe grade: 16%, very severe grade: 8%). And these psychosocial issues had no significant correlation with gender, age, household income and treatment . The same questionnaires were completed by 5 patients for the second time after median 8（2-18）months. Compared to the initial assessment, they scored significantly worse on the emotional scales (P=0.0237). No significant difference regarding physical functioning, role functioning, cognitive functioning and social functioning were observed between the former and the latter. Conclusions: The majority of CLL patients had impaired QoL and psychosocial issues. Active-treatment patients had worse physical condition than "watch and wait" patients. Male patients had better cognitive functioning. Younger patients had more worries about health than the elderly. Greater efforts should be made in management of CLL patients. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

The study aimed to examine the psychometric properties of the coronavirus anxiety scale (CAS) during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) delta epidemic. A total of 2,116 participants on the Chinese mainland completed the online survey. We employed exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to investigate the factor structure. The findings showed that the one-factor model of the CAS Chinese version fitted perfectly with the data. The multigroup CFAs showed the measurement invariance across gender and age groups (18–29 and 30–68). We also examined the CAS’s internal consistency and convergent and concurrent validity. The results demonstrated that the one-factor model had good reliability and convergent and concurrent validity. Overall, according to our findings, the CAS Chinese version was reliable for measuring coronavirus anxiety during the COVID-19 delta outbreak.

Background: Relatively few studies have reported quality of life (QoL) and psychosocial distress in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). This study aims to assess the QoL and psychological distress and the impact from sociodemographic and clinical parameters in the Chinese context.Methods: Taking advantage of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 questionnaire with QLQ-CLL17 module and DASS-21 questionnaire, a total of 50 Chinese patients with CLL completed self-reported questionnaires, assessing the level of depression, anxiety, stress and QoL.Results: A significantly higher proportion of patients in the active-treatment group had impaired physical function than the “watch and wait” group (90% vs. 65%, P=0.03). Patients with active treatment reported a significantly lower QoL in the role functioning subscale (84.44±25.50 vs. 95.83±9.17, P=0.031) and cognitive functioning subscale (76.67±18.88 vs. 89.17±12.42, P=0.007). The symptom scales had a negative impact on the functioning subscale. A dramatically high proportion of patients reported psychological distress. With regard to sociodemographic parameters, gender, age, education background and income had certain impact on functional subscales. 5 patients retested the questionnaires after median 8（2-18）months. Compared to the initial assessment, they scored significantly worse on the emotional scales (P=0.0237).Conclusions: There are unique correlates of QoL and disease status among Chinese CLL patients. This finding illuminates individual differences that may be associated with QoL. Therefore, psychosocial interventions and survivorship care plans should be made in the management of CLL survivors.