Stemona parviflora is an endangered species, narrowly endemic to Hainan and Southwest Guangdong. The taxonomic classification of S. parviflora remains controversial. Moreover, studying endangered species is helpful for current management and conservation. In this study, the first complete chloroplast genome of S. parviflora was assembled and compared with other Stemona species. The chloroplast genome size of S. parviflora was 154,552 bp, consisting of 87 protein-coding genes, 38 tRNA genes, 8 rRNA genes, and one pseudogene. The ψycf1 gene was lost in the cp genome of S. sessilifolia, but it was detected in four other species of Stemona. The inverted repeats (IR) regions have a relatively lower length variation compared with the large single copy (LSC) and small single copy (SSC) regions. Long repeat sequences and simple sequence repeat (SSR) were detected, and most SSR were distributed in the LSC region. Codon usage bias analyses revealed that the RSCU value of the genus Stemona has almost no difference. As with most angiosperm chloroplast genomes, protein-coding regions were more conservative than the inter-gene spacer. Seven genes (atpI, ccsA, cemA, matK, ndhA, petA, and rpoC1) were detected under positive selection in different Stemona species, which may result from adaptive evolution to different habitats. Phylogenetic analyses show the Stemona cluster in two main groups; S. parviflora were closest to S. tuberosa. A highly suitable region of S. parviflora was simulated by Maxent in this study; it is worth noting that the whole territory of Taiwan has changed to a low fitness area and below in the 2050 s, which may not be suitable for the introduction and cultivation of S. parviflora. In addition, limited by the dispersal capacity of S. parviflora, it is necessary to carry out artificial grafts to expand the survival areas of S. parviflora. Our results provide valuable information on characteristics of the chloroplast genome, phylogenetic relationships, and potential distribution range of the endangered species S. parviflora.

The genus Primula (Primulaceae) comprises more than 500 species, with 300 species distributed in China. The contradictory results between systematic analyses and morphology-based taxonomy make taxonomy studies difficult. Furthermore, frequent introgression between closely related species of Primula can result in non-monophyletic species. In this study, the complete chloroplast genome of sixteen Primula obconica subsp. obconica individuals were assembled and compared with 84 accessions of 74 species from 21 sections of the 24 sections of the genus in China. The plastome sizes of P. obconica subsp. obconica range from 153,584 bp to 154,028 bp. Genome-wide variations were detected, and 1915 high-quality SNPs and 346 InDels were found. Most SNPs were detected in downstream and upstream gene regions (45.549% and 41.91%). Two cultivated accessions, ZP1 and ZP2, were abundant with SSRs. Moreover, 12 SSRs shared by 9 accessions showed variations that may be used as molecular markers for population genetic studies. The phylogenetic tree showed that P. subsp. obconica cluster into two independent clades. Two subspecies have highly recognizable morphological characteristics, isolated geographical distribution areas, and distinct phylogenetic relationships compared with P. obconica subsp. obconica. We elevate the two subspecies of P. obconica to separate species. Our phylogenetic tree is largely inconsistent with morphology-based taxonomy. Twenty-one sections of Primula were mainly divided into three clades. The monophyly of Sect. Auganthus, Sect. Minutissimae, Sect. Sikkimensis, Sect. Petiolares, and Sect. Ranunculoides are well supported in the phylogenetic tree. The Sect. Obconicolisteri, Sect. Monocarpicae, Sect. Carolinella, Sect. Cortusoides, Sect. Aleuritia, Sect. Denticulata, Sect. Proliferae Pax, and Sect. Crystallophlomis are not a monophyletic group. The possible explanations for non-monophyly may be hybridization, polyploidization, recent introgression, incorrect taxonomy, or chloroplast capture. Multiple genomic data and population genetic studies are therefore needed to reveal the evolutionary history of Primula. Our results provided valuable information for intraspecific variation and phylogenetic relationships within Primula.

No abstract