Background Vedolizumab (ENTYVIO) is a humanized α 4 β 7 integrin antagonist approved for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease, which selectively blocks gut-specific lymphocyte trafficking. We evaluated the risk of opportunistic infections of interest in patients treated with vedolizumab. Methods We determined the frequency of opportunistic infections and tuberculosis in patients receiving vedolizumab in phase 3 clinical trials and post-marketing settings. We also evaluated adverse events reported in the post-marketing setting in patients with a history of or concurrent hepatitis B/C virus infection. Results The incidence of opportunistic infections in patients receiving vedolizumab was 0.7 (GEMINI 1 and 2 clinical trials) and 1.0 (long-term safety study) per 100 patient-years, with 217 events reported in approximately 114,071 patient-years of exposure (post-marketing setting). Most opportunistic infections were nonserious and the majority of patients continued treatment with vedolizumab. Clostridium difficile was the most commonly reported infection, with an incidence rate of 0.5 per 100 patient-years (clinical trials). Tuberculosis was reported at 0.1 per 100 patient-years (clinical trials), with 7 events in the post-marketing setting. No tuberculosis-related deaths were reported in either setting. No cases of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy were reported. In 29 patients with a history of or concurrent hepatitis B/C infection in the post-marketing setting, no viral reactivation was observed. Conclusions Clinical trials and post-marketing data showed that the rate of serious opportunistic infections in patients receiving vedolizumab was low and most patients could continue vedolizumab treatment. The frequency of tuberculosis infection was also low and no hepatitis B/C viral reactivation was reported.
Background Perianal fistula (PAF), a complication of Crohn’s disease (CD), is associated with substantial economic costs and poor prognosis. We determined prevalence of PAF CD in the United States and compared costs and health care resource utilization (HRU) of PAF CD patients with matched non-PAF CD patients. Methods This was a retrospective cohort study of claims data from the IBM MarketScan Commercial Database from October 1, 2015, to September 30, 2018. Eligible patients were aged 18 to 89 years with ≥2 CD diagnoses. Patients with PAF CD had ≥1 PAF diagnosis or procedure code and were matched with non-PAF CD patients. Cumulative prevalence of PAF CD in the US population was calculated across total patients in MarketScan. All-cause and gastrointestinal (GI)-related costs and HRU were compared between groups using a generalized linear model (GLM). Results Cumulative 3-year prevalence of PAF was 7.70% of patients with CD (N = 81,862) and 0.01% of the US population. Among PAF CD (n = 1218) and matched non-PAF CD (n = 4095) patients, most all-cause costs and HRU were GI-related. Mean total all-cause and GI-related health care costs per patient and per year for PAF CD were $85,233 and $71,612, respectively, vs $40,526 and $29,458 for non-PAF CD (P < .0001). Among PAF CD vs non-PAF CD patients, GLM-adjusted proportions of patients with GI-related inpatient, outpatient, or pharmacy visits, mean GI-related inpatient length of stay, and mean GI-related surgeries were higher (P < .0001 for all comparisons). Conclusions Costs and HRU are significantly higher for patients with PAF CD vs non-PAF CD patients, highlighting the economic burden of the disease.
progressed) was estimated for both newly diagnosed and existing CD cases at 6 months and 1, 2, and 3 years. Kaplan-Meier estimates for time to progression (duration between index date and first progression event) were generated for newly diagnosed CD cases. Other outcomes e.g., demographic characteristics, were assessed over the follow-up period (between index date and 06/2020) using descriptive statistics. Results: In total, 23,241 patients (mean age 47.1 years [standard deviation 18.7]; 42.3% female) with CD were identified; 29.3% (n56804) were newly diagnosed and 70.7% (n516,437) were existing cases. The most common comorbidities in newly diagnosed and existing cases were obesity (25.4%; 18.4%), anxiety (24.5%; 21.9%), and depression (22.1%; 18.7%); extraintestinal manifestations (2.4%; 3.8%). The most common CD-related medication was antibiotics for newly diagnosed (25.2%; 18.3% existing) and acetylsalicylic acid for existing cases (27.5%; 13.1% newly diagnosed). Risk of CD progression over time ranged from 19.3% to 26.6% in newly diagnosed and 8.2% to 21.4% in existing cases (Table ). A total of 6804 patients with newly diagnosed CD progressed with a median time to progression of 709 days (interquartile range: 415-987) (Figure). Conclusion: Over 20% of all patients with CD experienced progression during the follow-up period. Intestinal stenosis was a more common complication than fistula or abscess.[0982] Figure 1. Time to Crohn's disease progression events for newly diagnosed cases Time from CD diagnosis to progression event was assessed for the entire follow-up period for newly diagnosed cases only and was estimated as the time from the index date (date of the first CD diagnosis) to the progression date. If no such progression event was observed in the available follow-up period, the patient was censored. CD, Crohn's disease; IQR, interquartile range.
Background Perianal fistula (PAF), a complication of Crohn’s disease (CD), is indicative of high disease severity and poor prognosis. We estimated the cumulative prevalence and treatment patterns of PAF CD in the USA. Methods In this retrospective study of IBM® MarketScan® Commercial and Medicare databases (conducted 1 October 2015 to 30 September 2018), patients (pts) were 18 to 89 years of age with at least two diagnoses of CD at least 30 days apart, and had continuous health plan enrolment for at least 12 months pre- and post-index date (first PAF diagnosis or procedure [PAF pts]). Non-PAF CD pts were assigned the same index date as matched PAF pts based on birth year, sex, presence/lack of CD diagnosis before index date, CD disease location and follow-up duration. Descriptive analysis was used for all variables. Treatment patterns and costs related to opioid use were compared among PAF pts. We also assessed four PAF pt cohorts with PAF-related surgery treated with one (cohort 1) or more than one (cohort 2) opioid within 7 days of index date or one (cohort 3) or more than one (cohort 4) opioid more than 7 days after index date. Results Cumulative prevalence of PAF CD (n = 81 862) was 7.7% (0.01% of the US population) over 3 years. The economic impact and treatment patterns were assessed in PAF (n = 1218; mean age 42 years; 52.4% men; 56.5% preferred provider organization [PPO] health plan) and matched non-PAF CD pts (n = 4095; mean age 43 years; 50.9% men; 57.6% PPO health plan). During follow-up, 65.8% of PAF and 42.3% of non-PAF pts were treated with at least one biologic agent. In the 30 days post-index, 31.9% of PAF pts were treated with biologics, with this percentage increasing over time; steroid use also remained high (Figure 1). Opioid treatment was associated with higher mean per patient per year (PPPY) total gastrointestinal (GI)-related costs for PAF pts (p < 0.0001). Mean PPPY total GI-related costs for pts with PAF-related surgery and opioid treatment were $50 605, $53 984, $82 973 and $92 375 for cohorts 1, 2, 3 and 4, respectively (Figure 2). Generalized linear model-adjusted mean PPPY PAF-related surgeries were 7.2 versus 0 for PAF pts and non-PAF pts (p < 0.0001), respectively. In the 30 days post-index date, 22.5% of PAF pts had minor surgeries and 20.0% had definitive surgeries. Conclusion Based on treatment guidelines as well as the study population’s use of inflammatory bowel disease medications and opioids, and higher rates of PAF-related surgeries, a need for better disease state management of patients with PAF CD is warranted. Sponsor: Takeda Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.