No abstract

Objectives MALDI-TOF MS has been successfully used for empirical antibiotic selection. However, limited data are available regarding the usefulness of MALDI-TOF MS in common resistant organisms compared with rapid antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST). We prospectively evaluated the usefulness of rapid AST, compared with MALDI-TOF MS, for optimal antibiotic selection by infectious disease (ID) physicians in patients with bacteraemia including polymicrobial infection. Methods Three hundred and fifty-nine patients with positive blood culture were included for analysis. ID physicians prospectively decided on antibiotic regimens with consensus at each timepoint of receiving results of Gram stain, MALDI-TOF MS and rapid AST, the last of which was performed using QMAC-dRAST. Results ID physicians with MALDI-TOF MS results chose optimal targeted antibiotics in 255 (71.0%) cases, with appropriate antibiotic selection in 303 (84.4%) cases. The proportion of optimal targeted antibiotic selection and appropriate antibiotic selection was significantly lower for resistant strains than for susceptible strains [62.5% versus 79.2% (P < 0.001) and 68.2% versus 100% (P < 0.001), respectively]. QMAC-dRAST results led to optimal antibiotic treatment in 95 (91.3%) of the 104 cases receiving non-optimal targeted antibiotics. Optimal targeted treatments based on QMAC-dRAST results were possible in 322 (98.2%) of the 328 cases with monobacterial infection and in 345 (96.1%) of the 359 cases with monobacterial and polymicrobial infection. Conclusions MALDI-TOF MS has a high chance of failure in guiding ID physicians to optimal antibiotics, especially against resistant organisms. With increasingly common resistant organisms, rapid AST is needed to identify optimal targeted antibiotics early in bacteraemia.

The introduction of dRAST could increase the use of optimal antibiotics and reduce unnecessary broad-spectrum antibiotic use in the early period of bacteraemia.

BackgroundTuberculosis (TB), especially extrapulmonary tuberculosis (EPTB), is an important cause of fever of unknown origin (FUO) in TB-burdened areas. Little information is known about patients with EPTB with clinical features presenting as FUO and about the factor of delaying the diagnosis.MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed EPTB patients who were referred with FUO at 3 university-affiliated hospitals over 8 years (2010–2017). The subjects were assigned to groups of early diagnosis and delayed diagnosis within 3 days of an initial comprehensive evaluation from the referral. Clinical and laboratory variables were compared between the groups.ResultsA total of 95 patients with febrile EPTB were included. Localizing symptoms and/or signs suggestive of anatomy were identified in 62.1% of the patients. Concurrent lung involvement by TB was presented by 49.5% (47/95) of the patients, and only 23.4% of them showed typical findings of pulmonary TB on simple chest X-ray. Most of the patients showed abnormal lesions on cross-sectional CT (98.9%) and MRI (100%). The clinical variables and blood test results of patients were not significantly different between the two groups. The less typical imaging finding of EPTB on CT (38.5% vs. 79.0%) and MRI (37.5% vs. 79.0%) in the delayed diagnosis group was a risk factor for delayed diagnosis.ConclusionFebrile EPTB referred as FUO showed nonspecific clinical manifestations. The active application of cross-sectional imaging tests according to clinical clues or randomly in the absence of local manifestations, combined with invasive diagnostic approaches even for atypical presentations may lead to an earlier diagnosis of febrile EPTB.