Pedicular arthrodesis is the traditional procedure in terms of increase in the biomechanical stability with higher fixation rate. The current work aims to identify the effect of three spinal pedicle screws considering cortical and cancellous degeneracy condition. Lumbar section L2-L3 is utilized and various load and moment conditions were applied to depict the various biomechanical parameters for selection of suitable screw. Three dimensional model is considered in finite element analysis to identify the various responses of pedicle screw at bone screw juncture. Computed tomography (CT) images of a healthy male were considered to generate the finite element vertebral model. Generated intact model was further utilized to develop the other implanted models of degenerated cortical and cancellous bone models. The three fused instrumented models with different cortical and cancellous degeneracy conditions were analyzed in finite element analysis. The results were obtained as stress pattern at bone screw boundary and intervertebral disc stress. FE simulated results represents significant changes in the von Mises stress due to various load and moment conditions on degenerated bones during different body movement conditions. Results have shown that among all pedicle screws, the 6.0 mm diameter screw reflects very less stress values at the juncture. Multiple results on biomechanical aspects obtained during the FE study can be considered to design a new stabilization device and may be helpful to plan surgery of critical sections.
Spinal instrumentations have been classified as rigid fixation, total disc replacement and dynamic stabilization system for treatment of various spinal disorders. The efficacy and biomechanical suitability of any spinal implant can be measured through in vitro, in vivo experiments and numerical techniques. With the advancement in technology finite element models are making an important contribution to understand the complex structure of spinal components along with allied functionality, designing and application of spinal instrumentations at preliminary design stage. This paper aimed to review the past and recent studies to describe the biomechanical aspects of various spinal implants. The literatures were grouped and reviewed in accordance to instrumentation category and their functionality in the spinal column at respective locations.
The work investigates the effect of proposed novel semi-rigid stabilization device on lumbar segment L2-L3 so as to preserve motion at vertebral level. Here, the biomechanical behavior of intact spine with three instrumented spinal models (semi-rigid stabilization device, rigid implant and dynamic stabilization system NFlex) have been compared under the motion conditions of flexion, extension, bending and twist. Three-dimensional non-linear finite models of intact spine, semi-rigid stabilization device, rigid implant and dynamic stabilization system NFlex were developed in the present study. All the four models were subjected to a combined load of 400 N in axial compression along with 2, 4, 6, 8 and 10 N m as bending moment individually. Dynamic stabilization system NFlex shows the maximum variation in motion and reflects range of motion as 89.7% during lateral bending, 53.4% in flexion, 34.6% in twist and 28.0% in extension with respect to intact spine. However, semi-rigid stabilization device and rigid implant shows the range of motion of 60%, 48.7%, 32% and 21.8% and 60%, 32.3%, 22.3% and 21.7% of intact, respectively, during bending, flexion, twist and extension. Finite element simulation results reveal that semi-rigid stabilization device shows comparatively lower values than dynamic stabilization system NFlex and higher as compared to rigid implant for measured intradiscal pressure and von Mises strain at intervertebral disc-23.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.