An
integrated, modular, and multifunctional process is conceptually
designed, simulated, and optimized for direct utilization of CO2 from dilute flue gas to produce high-quality syngas, a precursor
for many value-added chemicals and liquid transportation fuels. The
process is intensified to simultaneously capture and convert CO2 using methane, natural gas, or excess fuel gas from the same
plant, or using nearby unconventional methane from biogas or landfill
gas. It is an integrated adsorption-purge-reaction system where CO2 is first adsorbed and then desorbed using methane-rich feed
leading to a mixture suitable for dry-reforming. The merging of concentration-based
CO2 desorption with the reactor feed premixing step eliminates
the need for pressure or temperature swings and significantly reduces
the energy penalty and cost of CO2 capture and utilization.
The process is simulated at different conditions using a high-fidelity
process model to elucidate the effects of key decision variables as
well as the trade-offs and interactions between the capture and reforming
sections. The technology is flexible to handle different feedstock
compositions, and is amenable to both centralized and distributed
production of syngas. A constrained grey-box optimization method is
employed to achieve a maximum of 99.7% net overall CO2 utilization
considering auxiliary emissions at a total cost ranging from $110–130
per ton of syngas. As much as 14.6% of the total CO2 input
to the process comes “directly” from flue gas without
additional cost for CO2 capture while maintaining about
91% overall CO2 utilization. The technology is also computationally
found to be robust in terms of CO2 utilization and cost
for different natural gas feeds with CO2 contamination
as high as 60%. This can be attributed to the novel process intensification
concept and the gray-box constrained optimization method presented
in this work.
Aims
Diabetes mellitus is a risk factor for nephrolithiasis. A recent observational study found that SGLT2 inhibitor use by type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients was associated with a 49% lower risk of nephrolithiasis, compared to GLP-1 receptor agonists. We examined the association between nephrolithiasis and the SGLT2 inhibitor empagliflozin, using existing data from randomized clinical trials.
Methods
We pooled data from 15,081 T2D patients randomized to empagliflozin (n=10,177) or placebo (n=4,904) from 20 phase I-IV trials including the large CV outcome trial, EMPA-REG OUTCOME. Incident urinary tract stone events were captured using a pre-defined collection of MedRA terms. A sensitivity analysis using a narrower definition was also performed. Incidence rate ratios (IRR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using the relative risk estimate, stratified by study.
Results
The median exposures to study drug was 543 days (placebo) and 549 days (empagliflozin).183 patients experienced an incident urolithiasis during follow-up (placebo, 79; empagliflozin,104), yielding annual incidence rates of 1.01 versus 0.63 events/100 patient-years in the two respective groups. The IRR was 0.64 (95% CI 0.48, 0.86), in favor of empagliflozin. In the sensitivity analysis, the results were similar (IRR, 0.62 [95% CI 0.45, 0.85]).
Conclusion
Compared to placebo, empagliflozin therapy was associated with an approximate 40% reduced risk of urinary tract stone events in T2D patients. The underlying mechanisms are unknown but may involve altered lithogenic profile of the urine. Dedicated randomized prospective clinical trials are warranted to confirm these initial observations in both patients with and without T2D.
Objective
Severe hypoglycemia (blood glucose < 50 mg/dl) in hospitalized patients with diabetes mellitus is associated with poor outcomes such as increased mortality and readmission rates. We study the effects of system based interventions in managing severe hypoglycemia and its impact on outcomes.
Research design and methods
We performed retrospective review of pre- and post- intervention study to quantify severe hypoglycemia in patients admitted in the general internal medicine wards with primary or secondary diagnosis of diabetes mellitus based on ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes. We implemented multidisciplinary interventions including standardization of treatment, education of in-patient medical teams and physician notification and feedback immediately after severe hypoglycemia. The endpoints were the comparative analysis of incidence of severe hypoglycemia, in-patient mortality rate, 30-day mortality rate, 30-day readmission rate, recovery time from hypoglycemia, time to next glucose measurements, use of standardized treatment and physician notification rate pre-and post-intervention.
Results
The incidence of severe hypoglycemia per patient with diabetes was reduced from 9.6% (233/2416) to 5.6% (202/3607) (p<0.001) post-intervention. The in-patient mortality rate in patients with severe hypoglycemia reduced from 4.1% to 0% (p = 0.019), 30-day mortality rate reduced from 9.8% to 3.8% (p = 0.058) post-intervention. 30-day readmission rate was comparable between pre-intervention (31.7%) and post-intervention (29%) (p = 0.60). In comparison, the mortality and readmission rates of all diabetic patients did not reduce during the same observation periods. Recovery time reduced from 116 (83–161) to 75 (57–102) min (p<0.01), time to next glucose measurement reduced from 39.5 (34–48) to 32 (28–35) min (p<0.01), use of standardized treatment improved from 22.7% (53/233) to 72.2% (146/202) (p<0.001) and physician notification rate increased from 29.2 (68/233) to 84.7% (171/202) post-intervention.
Conclusions
Our study shows that multidisciplinary strategies improves the process of early detection and management of severe hypoglycemia and reduce incidence and in-patient mortality rate.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.