Background The successful management of hypertension requires sustained engagement in self-care behaviour such as adhering to medication regimens and diet. Bandura’s Social Cognitive Theory suggests that self-efficacy is a major determinant of engagement in self-care behaviour. Self-efficacy refers to an individual’s belief in their capacity to execute behaviours necessary to produce specific performance attainments. This systematic review of observational studies aims to summarise and evaluate the quality of evidence available to support the association between self-efficacy and engagement in self-care behaviour in hypertension. Methods Searches were performed of the Pubmed, MEDLINE, CINAHL and OpenSIGLE databases from database inception to January 2020. Reference lists and individual journals were also hand searched. Observational studies in English quantifying self-efficacy and self-care behaviour in hypertensive adults were included. The quality of included articles was assessed with the National Institute of Health Quality Assessment Tool for observational studies. Results The literature search identified 102 studies, of which 22 met the inclusion criteria for full-text review. There were 21 studies which reported that higher self-efficacy was associated with engagement in self-care behaviours including medication adherence (n = 9), physical activity (n = 2) and dietary changes (n = 1). Of these, 12 studies were rated as ‘good’ on the quality assessment tool and 10 were ‘fair’. A common limitation in these studies was a lack of objectivity due to their reliance on self-reporting of engagement in self-care behaviour. Conclusion Our review suggests an association between self-efficacy and self-care. However, the evidence supporting this association is of low to medium quality and is limited by heterogeneity. Our findings suggest the need for further well-designed interventional studies to investigate this association.
BackgroundCOVID-19 vaccination is a key public health measure to mitigate the crippling effects of the pandemic. COVID-19 vaccination began in adults and targeted adolescents at a later stage. However, medical decision-making on its uptake among the latter was unknown, which could be affected by their literacy and concerns about the vaccine. The study aimed to elucidate the awareness, concerns and barriers of adolescents toward the COVID-19 vaccine.MethodsA cross-sectional online survey using a self-developed questionnaire was conducted between June to November 2021. The adolescent participants were students from institutes of post-secondary education who were recruited via convenience sampling. The data were collated from an officially approved electronic platform, audited and analyzed. Continuous and categorical variables were expressed as mean (standard deviation) and percentages, respectively.ResultsA total of 460 adolescents participated in the study (mean age: 16.99 ± 0.99; 73% female). Most of them (91.5%) were aware of the COVID-19 vaccines. The main barriers to vaccination were uncertainty about long-term health risks (38.6%) and vaccine efficacy (37.3%). Regarding the potential vaccine side effects, they were concerned about: anaphylactic shock (73.2%), low blood pressure (58.3%) and fast heartbeat (58.0%). Only 58% expressed willingness for repeated COVID-19 vaccination.ConclusionDespite high COVID-19 vaccine awareness, the adolescents were concerned about the potentially severe but rare side-effects. The study identified apprehension regarding vaccine efficacy and the potential long-term health impact as the main barriers to vaccination. Future studies should address these concerns to scale vaccination programs among adolescents.
Objective:The prevalence of hypertension among adults in Singapore has increased signifincantly from 24% (2017) to 35% (2020); half of those who have been diagnosed remained uncontrolled. Most of the patients with hypertension are managed in the primary care setting. Therefore, this study aimed to explore the experiences, challenges and needs of primary care providers in managing hypertension in SingaporeDesign and method:This qualitative study reported preliminary findings from 10 individual in-depth interviews with healthcare providers (5 doctors, 3 nurses and 2 pharmacists) in 2 primary care polyclinics in Singapore. The subjects were recruited purposively (based on experience and position) and recruitment continued till saturation was achieved. An experienced qualitative researcher conducted the interviews using an interview guide developed based on theories, literature review and expert discussion. All interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed verbatim, checked and managed using NVivo qualitative data management software. Thematic analysis was used for data analysis.Results:Four main challenges emerged from the preliminary analysis: (1) Lack of adequate blood pressure readings for decision making; (2) Lack of clarity of roles and responsibilities of healthcare team in hypertension care; and (3) Practice variations and lack of standardised training and (4) Usability and utility issues with the electronic medical record.Conclusions:Despite clear evidence on home blood pressure monitoring, team-based care, patient and clinician education, and technology in enhancing hypertension care, this study found a gap in implementing these clinical evidence. There is a clear need to find effective and sustainable strategies to overcome these barriers to improve hypertension care in primary care.
Introduction Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers (ARB) are widely utilized in the treatment of hypertension and nephropathy. In March 2019, a mass recall of selected brands of an ARB, losartan due to reported elevated levels of potentially carcinogenic nitrosamine impurities was implemented in a Singapore primary care institution. Objective To describe the crisis management of the mass losartan recall in a public primary healthcare institution in Singapore. Methods The crisis management framework was adapted from the Gonzalez-Herrero and Pratt model. This crisis was managed over three phases: identification of impending crisis based on risk reports by local health authorities, formation of a task force to develop turnaround strategies and measures, implementation and monitoring of the remedial measures. Data to plan and chart implementation was retrieved from the institution databases, including the Electronic Health Intelligence System for patient medical and prescription records, Outpatient Administrative System for reimbursement of medications and other expenditures incurred. An exigency scheme, Losartas® Review Service (LRS), was established to expedite the replacement of the affected medication with another ARB or another anti-hypertensive medication. Results SingHealth Polyclinics completed the recall of 29,794 (92.1%) patients within 14 weeks. The majority of the patients (76.2%) were attended to by doctors, while 16.5% and 7.3% were managed using the LRS and pharmacy respectively. The institution incurred a cost of SGD2,824,760 (estimated SGD95 per patient) to manage the crisis. Conclusion The successful implementation of a mass medication recall hinged on timely intervention, cross-departmental coordination, effective communication and judicious resource allocation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.