The Himalayan arc has an arcuate E-W trending geometry with reversal of trend at the terminal ends -Nanga-Parbat (western) syntaxis and Namcha-Barwa (eastern) syntaxis. Both ends are characterized by an actively deformed uplifted dome with its flanks bounded by active shear zones/faults that cause the majority of the seismicity. Compiled map data and seismo-geological depth sections around these two syntaxial zones have brought out active crustal structure and seismotectonic setup. The Nanga-Parbat syntaxis exhibits upward bending and subsequent thickening of the Indian plate with the cluster of seismicity along the NNE-SSW trending Raikhot fault/Diamer shear in its western margin and a comparatively less active Rupal-Chichi shear zone of N-S trend with diffused seismicity towards the east. The 2005 Kashmir earthquake is spawned due to interaction of the Main Boundary thrust and the Muzaffarabad fault. The Namcha-Barwa syntaxis displays a fault-bounded upliftment and thickening of the Indian plate where Canyon thrust marks the boundary between the Indian and Eurasian plates. The occurrence of the 1950 Assam earthquake in the vicinity of the eastern syntaxis is attributed to a regional right lateral strike-slip motion on the causative fault plane. The seismicity in the syntaxes is primarily controlled by strike-slip faults/shear zones along the flanks of popup antiforms.
Many seismologists have looked at the 26 January 2001 Bhuj earthquake as a key modern calibration event that could be used to improve estimates of magnitudes of large historic mainshocks in stable continental regions. Since no instrumental data are available for important historic events such as the 1819 Allah Bund, India, and the 1811-1812 New Madrid, central U.S. mainshocks, calibration hinges on comparisons of the macroseismic effects of these earthquakes with those of comparable modern earthquakes for which a reliable, instrumentally determined moment magnitude is available. However, although such a comparison is conceptually straightforward, in practice it is complicated by potentially significant inconsistencies in methods used to quantify macroseismic effects in different regions and/ or times. For the Bhuj earthquake, extensive intensity data sets have been compiled and published from both media accounts and detailed direct surveys. Comparing the two provides a quantification of the previously suspected media bias, whereby earthquake effects can be exaggerated in media accounts. This bias is a strong function of intensity level, with substantial bias at the highest shaking levels and significantly less bias at low intensities. Because only sparse documentary data are in general available for older historic earthquakes, the results of this study suggest that their inferred intensity distributions might be similarly biased. We further use the surveybased intensity values to develop a new relationship between intensities and ground motions.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.