No abstract

BackgroundStudies have shown regional and functional selectivity of cardiac postganglionic neurones indicating there might exist a similar heterogeneity in spinal segmental preganglionic neurones, which requires further investigation.MethodsRight and left sympathetic chains were electrically stimulated from T6 to T1 in the innervated isolated rabbit heart preparation (n = 18). Sinus rate, left ventricular pressure, retrograde ventriculo-atrial conduction, monophasic action potential duration, effective refractory period, ventricular fibrillation threshold and electrical restitution were measured.ResultsRight sympathetic stimulation had a greater influence on heart rate (T1-T2: right; 59.9 ± 6.0%, left; 41.1 ± 5.6% P < 0.001) and left stimulation had greater effects on left ventricular pressure (T1-T2: right; 20.7 ± 3.2%, left; 40.3 ± 5.4%, P < 0.01) and ventriculo-atrial conduction (T1-T2: right; −6.8 ± 1.1%, left; −15.5 ± 0.2%) at all levels, with greater effects at rostral levels (T1-T3). Left sympathetic stimulation caused shorter monophasic action potentials at the base (T4-T5: right; 119.3 ± 2.7 ms, left; 114.7 ± 2.5 ms. P < 0.05) and apex (T4-T5: right; 118.8 ± 1.2 ms, left; 114.6 ± 2.6 ms. P < 0.05), greater shortening of effective refractory period (T4-T5: right; −3.6 ± 1.3%, left; −7.7 ± 1.8%. P < 0.05), a steeper maximum slope of restitution (T4-T5 base: right; 1.3 ± 0.2, left; 1.8 ± 0.2. P < 0.01. T4-T5 apex: right; 1.0 ± 0.2, left; 1.6 ± 0.3. P < 0.05) and a greater decrease in ventricular fibrillation threshold (T4-T5: right; −22.3 ± 6.8%, left;-39.0 ± 1.7%), with dominant effects at caudal levels (T4-T6).ConclusionsThe preganglionic sympathetic efferent axons show functionally distinct pathways to the heart. The caudal segments (T4-T6) of the left sympathetic chain had a greater potential for arrhythmia generation and hence could pose a target for more focused clinical treatments for impairments in cardiac function.

This article presents data highlighting the functional selectivity of cardiac preganglionic sympathetic neurons in the rabbit heart. Specifically, the data draw attention to the role of each spinal segmental outflow on cardiac electrophysiology and the influence of each segment on cardiac excitability through investigating markers of arrhythmia such as electrical restitution. This data holds importance for exploring whether the preganglionic sympathetic neurons have functionally distinct pathways to the heart and whether some spinal segmental outflows have a greater potential for arrhythmia generation than others. Discussion of the data can be found in Chauhan et al. (2018) [1].

Background: Abnormal autonomic activity including impaired parasympathetic control is a known hallmark of heart failure (HF). Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) has been shown to reduce the susceptibility of the heart to ventricular fibrillation, however the precise underlying mechanisms are not well understood and the detailed stimulation parameters needed to improve patient outcomes clinically are currently inconclusive.Objective: To investigate NO release and cardiac electrophysiological effects of electrical stimulation of the vagus nerve at varying parameters using the isolated innervated rabbit heart preparation.Methods: The right cervical vagus nerve was electrically stimulated in the innervated isolated rabbit heart preparation (n = 30). Heart rate (HR), effective refractory period (ERP), ventricular fibrillation threshold (VFT) and electrical restitution were measured as well as NO release from the left ventricle.Results: High voltage with low frequency VNS resulted in the most significant reduction in HR (by −20.6 ± 3.3%, −25.7 ± 3.0% and −30.5 ± 3.0% at 0.1, 1 and 2 ms pulse widths, with minimal increase in NO release. Low voltage and high frequency VNS significantly altered NO release in the left ventricle, whilst significantly flattening the slope of restitution and significantly increasing VFT. HR changes however using low voltage, high frequency VNS were minimal at 20Hz (to 138.5 ± 7.7 bpm (−7.3 ± 2.0%) at 1 ms pulse width and 141.1 ± 6.6 bpm (−4.4 ± 1.1%) at 2 ms pulse width).Conclusion: The protective effects of the VNS are independent of HR reductions demonstrating the likelihood of such effects being as a result of the modulation of more than one molecular pathway. Altering the parameters of VNS impacts neural fibre recruitment in the ventricle; influencing changes in ventricular electrophysiology, the protective effect of VNS against VF and the release of NO from the left ventricle.