Humeral shaft fractures are common injuries making upto 1-3% of all fractures. They are widely treated by conservative methods leading to higher rates of non-union. Henceforth surgeons tend to perform operative procedures to treat them. To statistically analyse and compare the functional and radiological outcome of two treatment modalities of humeral shaft fractures, they are plate osteosyntheis and antegrade intramedullary nailing. A total of 22 patients of humeral shaft fractures were operated by either of two methods 12 in plating (P) group ,10 in nailing (N) group and their radiological outcome was assessed by rate of union, time taken for callus formation etc and their Functional outcome was analysed based on Rodriguez Merchan criteria. The commonest age group of patients operated is 21-40 years (70%) majority being males (70%) and road traffic accident being commonest mode of injury. The plate osteosynthesis group stands superior than nailing group in terms of duration of union (20 weeks), rate, percentage of union (100%), least risk of non-union (0). Statistically significant (p<0.05) improvement in shoulder joint function with minimal complications. The plate osteosynthesis method is the most promising surgical procedure for treating humeral shaft fracture due to negligible rates of non-union and early recovery of motion. Though nailing group has minimal need of soft tissue dissection, preserves fracture biology, decreased operative time and early rehabilitation period it still stands inferior when it comes to complications like rotator cuff injury, shoulder impingement pain and restriction of shoulder movements. Ultimately the post operative quality of life is equally good in both techniques.
Background: Partial tears of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) were more commonly identified in young group with knee twisting. Partial tears are characterized by tear involvement of less than 50% of the ligament is torn. The arthroscopic evaluation is considered as gold standard in diagnostic evaluation. The comparison of findings between partial and complete tears in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and arthroscopy helps in finding out reliability of diagnostic modalities and consider the surgeon to establish the plan of treatment. Methods: 2-year prospective study at the department of orthopedics, RRMCH, Bangalore, India. 40 consecutive patients with suspicion of cruciate injuries of knee were selected for the study from July 2018 to May 2021. The MR imaging of knee in selected cases were performed and the findings were obtained. The descriptive statistical analysis was prepared which includes spectrum of MRI findings in cruciate injuries of knee that were correlated with arthroscopy findings in determining the accuracy. Results: Total 40 patients, we obtained 100% sensitivity and 66.67% specificity, 93.75% accuracy of MRI with arthroscopy in diagnosing complete ACL tears. We obtained 90.91% sensitivity and 80% specificity, 87.50% accuracy of MRI with arthroscopy in diagnosing partial ACL tears. Conclusions: The partial tears can be missed or can be over diagnosed on MRI. These misinterpretations are more likely to happen due to intra-substance signal abnormality. Description of the status of ACL ligament in arthroscopy helped the orthopaedic surgeons in decision making as conservative approach in partial tears and reconstruction in a complete tear.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.