Purpose Prior to availability of anti-HER2 therapies, HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) was associated with a poor prognosis. Prospective randomized trials have demonstrated survival benefit from anti-HER2 treatments. Anecdotal observations have suggested that a small but meaningful fraction of patients with HER2-positive MBC may be “exceptional responders” with long survival. We hypothesized that demographic and/or clinicopathologic characteristics can be identified to distinguish short-term from long-term survivors. Methods A retrospective, single institution review of 168 patients with HER2-positive MBC who received treatment with anti-HER2 therapy in the metastatic setting was performed. Cox proportional hazards analysis was used to assess factors associated with long-term survival. Results Median overall survival from the time of breast cancer recurrence was 3.9 years (95% CI 3.4–5.2). From the time of diagnosis of MBC, 56 (33%) survived for 5 or more years and 12 (7%) survived more than 10 years. Of the 66 patients diagnosed with central nervous system metastases, 9 (14%) survived more than 5 years following that diagnosis. Younger age at diagnosis, lower stage, hormone receptor positive status, and only having one organ involved at diagnosis were associated with longer survival. Four patients discontinued anti-HER2 therapy and are without evidence of progression of disease after a median 7.4 years (0.2–12.0) since stopping therapy. Conclusions In a cohort of patients with HER2-positive MBC treated primarily with trastuzumab and lapatinib, 7% of patients were “exceptional responders”. Combining these clinical factors associated with molecular determinants of prolonged survival with may provide insights for individualizing treatment selection.

Following years in development, poly-adenosyl-ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors continue to advance the treatment of ovarian and breast cancers, particularly in patients with pathogenic BRCA mutations. Differences in clinical trial design have contributed to distinct indications for each of the PARP inhibitors. Toxicity patterns are also emerging that suggest agents differ in their normal tissue tolerance-beyond what might be expected by dose variations and/or exposure to prior treatment. PARP inhibitor resistance is an increasingly relevant issue as the drugs move to the forefront of advanced ovarian/breast cancer treatment, and is an active area of ongoing research. This review examines the PARP inhibitor clinical trials that have led to approved indications in ovarian and breast cancers, PARP inhibitor targets and pharmacological differences between the PARP inhibitors, emerging mechanisms of resistance, and key clinical questions for future development.

No abstract

Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) has emerged as the most applicable and important tumor marker for carcinoma prostate. In the present study PSA was determined in serum of healthy subjects, patients of benign prostate hypertrophy (BPH) and Carcinoma Prostate (Ca-P) to evaluate its diagnostic efficiency in day to day management of prostate cancer patients and in differentiating patients of early prostate cancer from those with BPH. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) revealed 2 ng/ml and 10 ng/ml cut off serum PSA level for BPH and untreated carcinoma prostate patients (Ca-P). An extremely significant increase (P<0.0001) was observed in mean PSA concentration in BPH patients and adenocarcinoma prostate patients when compared to healthy males. Clinical relevance of PSA was highlighted by a case study of cancer patient prior to any therapy till death.

Glutamate carboxypeptidase II (GCPII) haplotypes were found to influence susceptibility to prostate cancer. In the current study, we have elucidated the impact of these haplotypes on the expression of PSMA, BNIP3, Ec-SOD, GSTP1 and RASSF1 genes to understand the epigenetic basis of oxidative stress and prostate cancer risk. Expression analysis was carried out by RT-PCR. Bisulphite treated DNA was subjected to MS-PCR and COBRA for epigenetic studies. Plasma MDA and glutathione levels were measured. In prostate cancer, upregulation of BNIP3 (204.4 ± 23.77 vs. 143.9 ± 16.42 %, p = 0.03); and downregulation of Ec-SOD (105.8 ± 13.69 vs. 176.3 ± 21.1 %, p = 0.027) and RASSF1A (16.67 ± 16.0 vs. 90.8 ± 8.5 %, p = 0.0048) was observed. Hypomethylation of BNIP3 (31.25 ± 16.19 vs. 45.70 ± 2.42 %, p < 0.0001), hypermethylation of Ec-SOD (71.4 ± 6.75 vs. 10.0 ± 3.78 %, p < 0.0001) and RASSF1 (76.25 ± 12.53 vs. 30.0 ± 8.82 %, p = 0.0077) was observed in prostate cancer. The gene expression signature of PSMA, BNIP3, Ec-SOD, GSTP1, clearly demarcated cases and controls (AUC = 0.89 in the ROC curve). D191V variant of GCPII showed positive association with oxidative stress and inverse association with Ec-SOD expression. H475Y variant showed positive association with Ec-SOD expression and inverse association with oxidative stress. R190W variant was found to reduce oxidative stress by increasing glutathione levels. GCPII genetic variants contribute to increased oxidative stress and prostate cancer risk by modulating the CpG island methylation of Ec-SOD.