Objective The present study examined whether pain catastrophizing and pain acceptance, two important targets of psychosocial interventions for chronic pain, are uniquely associated with pain severity and pain interference among patients on methadone maintenance treatment (MMT). Method A total of 133 MMT patients who reported experiencing some pain during the previous week completed a battery of self‐report measures. Multiple regression was used to test whether pain catastrophizing and pain acceptance are related to pain severity and pain interference above and beyond covariates including demographics, emotional distress, and current methadone dose. Results Both pain acceptance and catastrophizing were significantly associated with pain severity and pain interference while controlling for covariates. Conclusions Consistent with previous literature on patients with chronic pain but without opioid use disorder, our findings suggest that both pain catastrophizing and pain acceptance are potentially important intervention targets among MMT patients with co‐occurring opioid use disorder and chronic pain.

Background: Although smoking is prevalent among populations with opioid use disorder (OUD), few studies have examined electronic cigarette (EC) use in individuals seeking opioid agonist therapy (OAT). The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence and correlates of EC use among individuals seeking OAT. Methods: 782 patients seeking OAT for OUD completed surveys assessing current and past EC use, reasons for use, current and past cigarette smoking, nicotine dependence, psychiatric distress, trauma, and pain. Bivariate and multivariate models evaluated correlates of daily EC use, past-30day EC use, and current cigarette smoking. Results: 6% of patients reported daily EC use, 18% reported past-30-day use, 62% reported EC use history, and 85% reported current cigarette smoking. 46% reported using ECs to quit or cut down smoking. In multivariate analyses, daily EC use was associated with higher odds of being a former smoker (OR 21; CI 1.7-273) and lower odds of ever smoking more than 100 cigarettes *

ObjectivesThe prevalence of cannabis use among pregnant women is increasing in the United States and places mothers and infants at risk of multiple adverse health outcomes. Given the uncertainty expressed by providers regarding how to approach cannabis use during pregnancy and the growing need for a systematic endeavor to curb use in this population, the aim of this study is to conduct a systematic review of interventions focused on reduction in cannabis use during pregnancy.MethodsWe conducted a systematic search of MEDLINE, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Web of Science, SCOPUS, and Cochrane Library to identify studies of interventions that target individuals that engaged in cannabis use during pregnancy. We included studies if they were randomized controlled trials, controlled studies, feasibility studies, pilot studies, as well as observational studies. The primary diagnostic outcome of interest is reduction in cannabis use.ResultsWe identified 9 studies for inclusion with sample sizes ranging from 15 to 658 pregnant people. Interventions involved brief counseling, cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), motivational interviewing (MI), motivational enhancement therapy + cognitive behavioral therapy (MET-CBT), computer-delivered psychotherapy, and psychoeducation. The interventions that were effective primarily used MI, CBT, and/or MET. There was just 1 study that implemented a home intervention and one that explored computer-based psychotherapy.ConclusionsThe studies uncovered through this systematic review suggest that interventions involving CBT and/or MI demonstrate promise for decreasing cannabis use during pregnancy. There is a tremendous need for high-quality studies focused on this population, and the potential for remote and computer-based interventions should be explored more fully.

No abstract