To better understand whether Chinese mobility has a significant effect on the Australian residential real estate market, the relationship between Chinese individual mobility and Australian residential real estate market is explored. The Autoregressive Distributed Lag (ARDL) approach is employed to investigate the cointegration relationship of the variables, including Chinese tourism mobility, Chinese temporary migration mobility, Australian residential real estate prices and the Australian real estate construction. The primary finding is that Chinese tourism mobility and temporary migration mobility does not have a significant and positive effect on Australian residential real estate prices, but Chinese tourism mobility contributes to the development of the Australian real estate construction in the long run. In terms of the short run, Chinese tourism mobility and temporary migration mobility lead to an increase in Australian residential real estate prices and have a negative effect on the Australian real estate construction. It is believed that understanding the effect of Chinese individual mobility in the Australian residential real estate market will assist policymakers or researchers to make reasonable policies or methods to solve affordability issues caused by high residential real estate prices.

There is an increasing number of Chinese individual foreign investors (IFIs) in Australian residential real estate markets, but few studies specifically focus on Chinese IFIs and comprehensively analyse these investors’ motivations in the Australian real estate market. This paper examines the motivations of IFIs in the Australian residential real estate markets. A qualitative historical research approach was employed to examine the topic. By using semi-structured interviews of Chinese individual investors (consisting of Chinese temporary residents and Chinese nonresidents) and Australian agents in Australian residential real estate from 2014 to 2015, the paper finds four common motivations (good living environment, stable political environment, cost efficiency and profit returns) and three distinct motivations (education, immigration and bandwagon effects) of Chinese IFIs. It was found that cost efficiency, profit returns, education investment and immigration tend to be articulated differently between Chinese temporary residents and Chinese nonresidents, although these four motivations were expressed by both. Chinese nonresidents consider cost efficiency and profit returns as their major motivations. In contrast to Chinese nonresidents, education, and immigration are the most important motivations instead of some traditional motivations such as profit returns or cost efficiency for Chinese temporary residents.