No abstract

No abstract

Thrombosis is a common complication of end-stage renal disease, particularly in patients on hemodialysis. Although substantial progress has been made in preventing thrombotic complications in various other groups of patients, the mechanisms of thrombosis during hemodialysis require clarification. In this report, we demonstrate that complement activation triggered by hemodialysis biomaterials, and the subsequent generation of the complement anaphylatoxin C5a, results in the expression of functionally active tissue factor (TF) in peripheral blood neutrophils. Because TF is a key initiator of coagulation in vivo, we postulate that the recurring complement activation that occurs during long-term hemodialysis contributes to thrombosis in dialyzed end-stage renal disease patients. Furthermore, we found that complement contributed to the induction of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, which has been implicated in the pathogenesis of thrombosis in patients treated with the recombinant form of this molecule. Importantly, the inhibition of complement activation attenuated the TF expression and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor induction in blood passing through a hemodialysis circuit, suggesting that the complement system could become a new therapeutic target for preventing thrombosis in patients with chronic renal failure who are maintained on hemodialysis.

ESRD diabetics with radial artery Mönckeberg calcifications receiving RCFs had worse late clinical outcomes compared with ESRD diabetics with healthy distal arm vessels receiving the same access. The long-term benefit of RCFs may be lost in diabetics with extensively calcified vessels, and preferably the brachial artery should be used instead.

No abstract

Background: Hemodiafiltration with online preparation of the substitution [online high-flux hemodiafiltration (OHDF)] and hemodiafiltration with prepared bags of substitution (HDF) are important, recently widely used renal replacement therapies in patients with end-stage renal disease. However, there is little information on the comparative impacts of these modalities versus conventional low-flux hemodialysis (HD) on the quality of life (QoL) of HD patients. This study investigates the effect of dialysis modality on QoL in chronic HD patients. Methods: In this prospective, randomized, cross-over, open label study, 24 patients were enrolled. Their age were 62 AE 13.34 years (mean AE SD), with the duration of dialysis of 31 AE 23.28 months (mean AE SD). Five of the patients were women. QoL was measured by the Short-Form Health Survey with 36 questions (SF-36) and subscale scores were calculated. Each patient received HD, OHDF, and HDF for 3 months, with the dialysis modality subsequently being altered. They completed the questionnaire of QoL at the end of each period. Results: There were statistical significant differences in QoL for the total .7) and 40.7 (30.2-62.8)], for classic low-flux HD and high-flux hemodiafiltration, for bodily pain [45 (26.9-66.9) and 55 (35.6-87.5)], and for role limitations due to emotional functioning [0 (0-33.3) and 33.3 (0-100)], respectively. The scores did not differ significantly between the two types of hemodiafiltration. Conclusions: Our study indicates that QoL differs significantly among patients receiving low-flux HD and high-flux hemodiafiltration, on total SF-36, bodily pain, and role limitations due to emotional functioning. Convective modalities may offer better QoL than diffusive HD.

No abstract

No abstract