Background: AST-120 (Kremezin), which is an oral spherical carbon adsorbent, has been reported to have the potential for retarding disease progression in patients with chronic kidney disease. We aimed to evaluate its efficacy and safety in this study. Methods: We systematically searched for randomized controlled trials published in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases. The primary outcomes were the renal outcome and all-cause mortality, and the change in serum indoxyl sulfate (IS) levels. The safety outcome was also evaluated in terms of reported major adverse events. A random-effects model was used when heterogeneity was expected. Results: Eight studies providing data for 3349 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The risk ratio of renal outcome and all-cause mortality were 0.97 (95% CI: 0.88–1.07; 6 trials) and 0.94 (0.73–1.20; 5 trials), respectively. Furthermore, the weighted mean change in IS levels from baseline to the end of the study was −0.28 mg/dL (95% CI: −0.46 to −0.11; 4 trials). Conclusions: This study provides evidence that AST-120 can effectively lower IS levels but still controversial in terms of slowing disease progression and all-cause mortality. Except for dermatological events, the incidence of adverse events did not differ significantly between the AST-120 and placebo groups.
Background: Chronic kidney disease (CKD) is associated with bone and mineral metabolism. In this study we evaluated the comparative efficacies and safety of osteoporosis medications in patients with CKD or a history of kidney transplantation, and make recommendations for the best choice of osteoporosis treatment among patients with CKD or a history of kidney transplantation.Methods: We systemically searched for randomized controlled trials published in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases up to June 2020. Network-meta analysis was used to compare the relative effectiveness of different treatments. A random-effects model was used when heterogeneity was expected. The safety of different treatments was also evaluated in terms of reported major adverse events.Results: A total of 17 studies with data from 10,214 patients who had stage 2–5 CKD, were receiving dialysis, or had a history of kidney transplantation were included in the network meta-analysis. Treatment with teriparatide, denosumab, alendronate, and raloxifene were all associated with a significantly reduced risk of fractures compared to treatment with placebos [teriparatide: odds ratio (OR) = 0.19, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.10–0.35; denosumab: OR = 0.40, 95% CI: 0.27–0.58; alendronate: OR = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.40–0.92; raloxifene: OR = 0.52, 95% CI: 0.41–0.67]. The rank probability and the surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) values suggested that teriparatide ranked the highest for improvement in vertebral bone mineral density (BMD) (SUCRA = 97.8%), whereas denosumab ranked the highest for improvement in femoral neck BMD (SUCRA = 88.3%).Conclusion: Teriparatide and denosumab seem to be the most effective treatments for preventing bone loss and reducing the risk of fracture in our network comparison. However, because of the limitations and potential biases in the reviewed studies, there is still some uncertainty about the best treatment options for osteoporosis in patients with CKD or a history of kidney transplantation.Systematic Review Registration: [PROSPERO], identifier [CRD42020209830].
Background:Sepsis-associated acute kidney injury (AKI) can accelerate the progression of chronic kidney disease and lead to permanent kidney damage. However, the relationship between sepsis-associated AKI and dialysis has not been well evaluated. Our study aimed to investigate the risk of AKI requiring dialysis after sepsis.Methods:A nationwide population-based case-crossover study comprised all patients requiring their first dialysis from 2004 to 2016 from the database of Taiwan’s National Health Insurance. Patients aged <20 years or with missing data were excluded.Results:147,201 and 75,031 patients requiring acute temporary and chronic dialysis were included in this study. The odds ratios (ORs) for patients requiring acute temporary dialysis after sepsis were 15.77, 10.67, 9.23, and 8.36 for exposure periods of 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks, respectively. For patients requiring chronic dialysis after sepsis, ORs were 6.99, 4.12, 4.16, and 3.66 for exposure periods of 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks, respectively. In analyses using no overlapping time intervals, the risk remained the highest during the time closest to the event.Conclusions: This study demonstrated that patients with sepsis had a markedly increased risk of renal failure requiring dialysis and the risk was highest within 1 week of sepsis.
Background: Patients with sepsis-associated acute kidney injury (AKI) are at risk of kidney damage, potentially necessitating acute temporary or chronic dialysis. Our study aims to estimate the odds ratio (OR) of preceding sepsis among patients requiring their first dialysis. Methods: A nationwide population-based case-only study was conducted using claims records from the National Health insurance database of Taiwan. All patients over 20 years of age who underwent their first dialysis between 2004 and 2016 were included in the study. The six months prior to their first dialysis served as a self-control period. Results: The study included 147,201 patients who required acute temporary and 75,031 patients who required chronic dialysis. The odds ratios for patients needing acute temporary dialysis after 1, 2, 3, and 4 weeks of exposure periods were 15.8, 10.7, 9.2, and 8.4, respectively. The ORs for patients requiring chronic dialysis were 7.0, 4.1, 4.2, and 3.7, respectively. Conclusions: Our findings indicate that sepsis was substantially associated with an increased risk of renal failure. The risk was highest during the first week following sepsis for both acute temporary and chronic dialysis cases.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.