Please confirm the given names (pink) and surnames (blue) of authors have been identified correctly. Please check and confirm whether all authors and their respective affiliations are appropriate. AU1) Please note that running head has been taken from the provided PDF. Please check and correct if necessary. AU2) Please check and confirm the edit made to the article title. AU3) Please check the edits made to the author name "Carlos Hernando-Domingo." AU4) Please provide city name and country for all affiliations. AU5) Please provide the Department/Unit (if any) in affiliations "1 and 2." AU6) Please note that structured abstract is not allowed as per journal style. Hence, it has been made as a single paragraph. Please check and confirm. AU7) Please note that the key words "biomarkers, marathon, inflammation, and running" have been removed from the section because it occurs in the article title and is therefore not allowed in the key word section as per style. Please provide suitable replacements for this word in the key word section, maintaining 3-6 key words in the section as per style. AU8) Please note that mandatory headings should be "Introduction, Methods, Results, Discussion, and Practical Applications." Please check and change. AU9) Please spell out abbreviation "HR." AU10) Please note that as per the journal style, the first 3 subheadings under the Methods section should be "Experimental Approach to the Problem," "Subjects," and "Procedures." Please check and change accordingly. AU11) Please note that as per the journal style, subheadings are not allowed in "Discussion" section and hence have been deleted. Please check. AU12) Please note that as per style, references have been reordered alphabetically in the list. Please check. AU13) Please note that the footnote designators " † and ‡" are not cited in the body of Table 1. Please check and provide the missing designator.

AIM This study was conducted to evaluate the psychometric properties of a rubric to assess nursing student performance in medium- and low-fidelity simulation. METHOD A psychometric study was carried out. Content validity was explored by a group of experts. Internal consistency was determined by means of Cronbach’s coefficient alpha. Interrater agreement and the level of concordance were established by the kappa coefficient and intraclass correlation index. RESULTS The relevance of the dimensions and the definition of each category scored higher than 3.25 on a Likert-type scale (maximum value of 4); content validity ratio values were close to +1. The kappa index was above 0.61 (p < .001) in all dimensions, thereby indicating a good level of interrater agreement; the intraclass correlation index showed values above .82 (p < .001). CONCLUSION The rubric appears to be psychometrically sound, thus supporting its reliability.