Pediatric high‐grade gliomas (pHGG) constitute 8% to 12% of primary brain tumors in childhood. The most widely utilized treatment encompasses surgical resection followed by focal radiotherapy and temozolomide. However, experiences over past decades have not demonstrated improved outcomes. pHGG have been classified into different molecular subgroups defined by mutations in histone 3, IDH gene, MAPK pathway, and others, thereby providing a rationale for various targeted therapies. Additionally, immunotherapy and drug repurposing have also become attractive adjunctive treatments. This review focuses on past, present, and emerging treatments for pHGG integrating molecular research with the mainstream pediatric drug development in Europe and the United States to sketch a way forward in the development of novel therapeutic approaches. The implementation of randomized clinical trials with adaptive designs, underpinned by a robust biological rationale, and harnessing collaboration between the pharmaceutical industry, academia, regulators and patients/parents organizations will be essential to improve the outcomes for these children.
Purpose: The COVID-19 pandemic has forced healthcare stakeholders towards challenging decisions. We analyse the impact of the pandemic on the conduct of phase I-II trials for paediatric cancer during the first month of state of alarm in Spain.Methods: A questionnaire was sent to all five ITCC-accredited Spanish Paediatric Oncology Early-Phase Clinical Trial Units, including questions about impact on staff activities, recruitment, patient care, supply of investigational products and legal aspects.Results: All units suffered personnel shortages and difficulties in enrolling patients, treatment continuity or performing trial assessments. Monitoring activity was frequently postponed (73%), and 49% of on-going trials interrupted recruitment. Only two patients could be recruited during this period (75% reduction in the expected rate).Conclusions: The COVID-19 crisis has significantly impacted clinical research practice and access to innovation for children with cancer. Structural and functional changes are under way to better cope with the expected future restrictions.
Background: Adoptive cell immunotherapies for opportunistic virus in immunocompromised patients using haploidentical memory T cells have shown to be safe and effective. Since severe cases of COVID-19 present a dysregulated immune system with T cell lymphopenia and a hyper-inflammatory state we have proposed that a similar strategy could be proven to be efficient for COVID-19 patients. This is a study protocol of an open-label, multicenter, double-arm, randomized, dose-finding phase I/II clinical trial to evaluate the feasibility, safety, tolerability, and efficacy of the administration of a single dose of allogenic SARS-CoV-2 specific memory CD45RA - T cells and Natural Killer (NK) cells in COVID-19 patients with lymphopenia and pneumonia. The aim of the study is to find efficient treatments for patients with moderate/severe COVID-19. Identification of Specific memory T cells and NK cells: i)Memory T Cells: we first determined the existence of SARS-CoV-2 specific T cells within the CD45RA - T memory cells of the blood of convalescent donors. Memory T cells can respond quickly to the infection and provide long-term immune protection to reduce the severity of the COVID-19 symptoms without inducing classically T cell alloreactivity. Also, CD45RA - memory T cells confer protection for other pathogens the donors encountered in their life. ii)NK cells: we determined the phenotype of NK cells after COVID-19 and the main characteristic of SARS-CoV-2 specific NK population in the blood of convalescent donors, as it has been shown for cytomegalovirus infections. Also, NK cells confer protection for other pathogens the donors encountered in their life. Pilot Phase I- Safety, feasibility, and dose escalation: Between September and November 2020 a phase 1, dose-escalation, single-center clinical trial was conducted to evaluate the safety and feasibility of the infusion of CD45RA - memory T cells containing SARS-CoV-2 specific T cells as adoptive cell therapy against moderate/severe cases of COVID-19. Nine participants with pneumonia and/or lymphopenia and with at least one human leukocyte antigen (HLA) match with the donor were infused. The first three subjects received the lowest dose (1x10 5 cells/kg), the next three received the intermediate dose (5x10 5 cells/kg) and the last three received the highest dose (1x10 6 cells/kg) of CD45RA - memory T cells. Clinicaltrials.gov registration: NCT04578210. Findings: All participants' clinical status measured by National Early Warning Score (NEWS) and 7-category point ordinal scales showed improvement six days after infusion. No serious adverse events were reported. Inflammatory parameters were stabilized post-infusion and the participants showed lymphocyte recovery two weeks after the procedure. Donor microchimerism was observed at least for three weeks after infusion in all patients. Interpretation: This study provides preliminary evidence supporting the idea that treatment of COVID-19 patients with moderate/severe symptoms using convalescent SARS-CoV-2 specific CD45RA - memory T cells is feasible and safe. We did not find dose-liming toxicity. The Recommended Phase 2 dose was 1x10 6 CD45RA - T cells. Phase II- Efficacy: Between January 2021 and July 2021 patients have been enrolled based on the matched with the HLA genotype of the convalescent donors and following the protocol inclusion/exclusion criteria. The primary outcome is the incidence of patient recovery at day 14, defined as normalization of fever and oxygen saturation or lymphopenia recovery. Secondary outcomes are the time to normal level of lymphocytes, the proportion of patients showing clinical improvement at day 7, time to first negative SARS-CoV-2 PCR, the incidence of treatment-related adverse events, duration of hospitalization, time to discharge, time to improvement by one category a 7-point ordinal scale or NEWS score, the proportion of patients requiring intensive care unit, and all-cause mortality. In addition, lymphocyte recovery by multiparametric flow cytometry and donor chimerism by real-time PCR in the experimental arm was monitored weekly during the first month. This study provides preliminary evidence supporting the idea that treatment of COVID-19 patients with moderate/severe symptoms using convalescent CD45RA - memory T cells is safe and feasible. The phase II clinical trial is ongoing to demonstrate efficacy. Figure 1 Figure 1. Disclosures Soria: Celgene: Other: Fees; Gilead: Other: Fees; AbbVie: Other: Fees.
IntroductionStudies addressing the role of haploidentical as alternative to HLA-matched donors for stem cell transplantation (SCT) often include patients with diverse hematological malignancies in different remission statuses.MethodsWe compared outcomes of children with acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) undergoing SCT in second complete remission (CR2) from haploidentical (n = 25) versus HLA-matched donor (n = 51).ResultsPatients were equally distributed across both groups according to age, immunophenotype, time to and site of relapse, relapse risk-group allocation, and minimal residual disease (MRD) before SCT. Incidence of graft failure, acute graft versus host disease (GVHD), and other early complications did not differ between both groups. We found no differences in overall survival (58.7% versus 59.5%; p = .8), leukemia free survival (LFS) (48% versus 36.4%; p = .5), event free survival (40% versus 34.4%; p = .69), cumulative incidence (CI) of subsequent relapse (28% versus 40.9%; p = .69), treatment related mortality (24% versus 23.6%; p = .83), CI of cGVHD (4.5% versus 18.7%; p = .2), and chronic GVHD-free and leukemia-free survival (44% versus 26.3%; p = .3) after haploidentical donor SCT. Chronic GVHD (HR = 0.09; p=.02) had protective impact, and MRD ≥ 0.01% before SCT (HR = 2.59; p=.01) had unfavorable impact on LFS.DiscussionThese results support the role of haploidentical donor SCT in children with ALL in CR2.
The genetic landscape of post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLD) in pediatric population has not been fully elucidated. This absence of information raises the question whether therapeutic strategies should be the same as for their counterparts in immunocompetent (IC) patients. The aim of this study was to characterize genetically and immunophenotypically pediatric monomorphic PTLD. Thirty-nine monomorphic PTLD ≤19 years-old (mean 10y, gender 25 male/14 female) were recruited and analyzed for germinal center markers, IRF4 and EBER expression. Presence of MYC, PAX5, IRF4, BCL2, BCL6 and 11q alterations was investigated by FISH. Additional molecular studies included clonality, copy number (CN) arrays, cell of origin-COO (Nanostring) and mutational analyses (Custom 167 lymphoma related genes panel, SureSelectXT, Agilent). Twenty-nine patients received solid organ transplantation and eight were hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients. The mean time from transplant to PTLD diagnosis was 34 months (range 2-170) and the estimated 5-year overall survival (5y-OS) rate was 67%. Patients that received a solid organ had a better prognosis than hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients (5y-OS 83% vs. 38%, p=0.03). Thirty-three cases were classified as diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) and six as Burkitt lymphoma (BL). Thirty-two cases had extranodal localization, 21 of which in the gastrointestinal tract. Among the DLBCL, 24/28 cases had an ABC/non-GC COO phenotype and the six BL were GCB. EBER was positive in 33/37 cases. Five out of six BL and one DLBCL had MYC rearrangements, while no 11q alterations or other rearrangements were observed. Ten out of the 23 pediatric monomorphic PTLD studied displayed CN alterations (mean 1.6 alt/case; range 0-12). Comparative analyses showed that pediatric PTLD had lower genetic complexity than BL (Scholtysik, 2010) and DLBCL (Ramis-Zaldivar, 2020) in IC patients and adult-PTLD (Ferreiro, 2016; Rinaldi, 2010) and lacked characteristic CN alterations of those groups. Regarding the mutational profile, all 6 PTLD-BL carried MYC mutations in addition to ID3 (4 cases), ARID1A (2 cases) or CCND3 (1 case) and a higher mutational burden than PTLD-DLBCL (12.3 vs 6.2, p=0.01). PTLD-DLBCL showed a very heterogeneous profile characterized by a lower number of mutations than their counterparts in IC patients (2.4 vs 6.5, p=0.01). Pathway enrichment analysis revealed that epigenetic modifiers and NOTCH pathway (4 cases each) were the most recurrently affected. Two out of 20 cases were classified as N1 according to LymphGen (Wright, 2020) algorithm while the rest remained undetermined. The mutational profile of pediatric PTLD-BL is similar to that observed in IC patients whereas PTLD-DLBCL are less complex than their counterpart in IC children and present a very heterogeneous mutational landscape with enrichment in NOTCH pathway mutations. Citation Format: Julia Salmeron, Natalia Castrejón-de-Anta, Pilar Guerra-Garcia, Joan Enric Ramis-Zaldivar, Mónica López-Guerra, Dolors Colomer, Francisco Diaz-Crespo, Marta Garrido, Javier Menarguez, Maria del Mar Andrés, Eugenia Garcia-Fernandez, Margarita Llavador, Noelia Garcia, Blanca Gonzalez-Farré, Idoia Martin-Guerrero, Carmen Garrido, Itziar Astigarraga, Alba Fernández, Jaime Verdú-Amorós, Soledad González-Muñíz, Berta Gonzalez, Verónica Celis, Elias Campo, Olga Balagué, Itziar Salaverria. Unravelling the heterogenous molecular landscape of pediatric post-transplant lymphoproliferative disorders [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 2502.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.