Sevoflurane preserved LV function after CPB with less evidence of myocardial damage in the first 36 h postoperatively. These data suggest a cardioprotective effect of sevoflurane during coronary artery surgery.

Sevoflurane and desflurane but not propofol preserved left ventricular function after CPB in high-risk coronary surgery patients with less evidence of myocardial damage postoperatively.

In coronary surgery patients the use of a volatile anesthetic regimen with sevoflurane was associated with a better recovery of myocardial function and less postoperative release of troponin I. In the present study we investigated whether these cardioprotective properties were also apparent in the cardiac surgical setting of aortic valve replacement (AVR) surgery for the correction of aortic stenosis. Thirty AVR surgery patients were randomly assigned to receive either target-controlled infusion of propofol or inhaled anesthesia with sevoflurane. Cardiac function was assessed perioperatively using a pulmonary artery catheter. Perioperatively, a high-fidelity pressure catheter was positioned in the left ventricle. Postoperative concentrations of cardiac troponin I were followed for 48 h. After cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB), stroke volume and dP/dt(max) were significantly higher in the patients with sevoflurane. Post-CPB, the effects of an increase in cardiac load on dP/dt(max) were similar to pre-CPB in the sevoflurane group (1.0 % +/- 5.4% post-CPB versus 1.3% +/- 8.6% pre-CPB) but more depressed in the propofol group (-8.2% +/- 4.4% post-CPB versus 0.1% +/- 4.9% pre-CPB). The rate of relaxation was significantly slower post-CPB in the propofol group. Postoperative levels of troponin I were significantly lower in the sevoflurane group. Our data indicate that the use of a volatile anesthetic regimen in AVR surgery was associated with better preservation of myocardial function and a reduced postoperative release of troponin I.

Surgical resection is a widely accepted treatment for pulmonary metastases on the condition that a complete resection can be obtained. However, many patients will develop recurrent disease in the thorax despite the use of systemic chemotherapy, dosage of which is limited because of systemic toxicity. Similar to the basic principles of isolated limb and liver perfusion, isolated lung perfusion is an attractive and promising surgical technique for the delivery of high-dose chemotherapy with minimal systemic toxicity. The use of biological response modifiers, like tumour necrosis factor, is also feasible. Other related methods of delivering high-dose locoregional chemotherapy include embolic trapping (chemo-embolisation) and pulmonary artery infusion without control of the venous effluent. Isolated lung perfusion has proven to be highly effective in experimental models of pulmonary metastases with a clear survival advantage. Lung levels of cytostatic drugs are significantly higher after isolated lung perfusion compared to intravenous therapy without systemic exposure. Phase I human studies have shown that isolated lung perfusion is technically feasible with low morbidity and without compromising the patient's pulmonary function. Further clinical studies are necessary to determine its definitive effect on local recurrence, long-term toxicity, pulmonary function and survival.

No abstract