This is the first in vivo demonstration by confocal microscopy of corneal crystals present in a patient with proven type I tyrosinemia, under NTBC treatment.

Introduction Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become an important part of the treatment of multiple cancers, especially for advanced melanoma and non-small cell lung cancer. Some tumors are capable of escaping immunosurveillance by stimulating checkpoints on T-cells. ICIs prevent activation of these checkpoints and thereby stimulate the immune system and indirectly the anti-tumor response. However, the use of ICIs is associated with various adverse events. Ocular side effects are rare but may have a major impact on the quality of life of the patient. Methods A comprehensive literature search of the medical databases Web of Science, Embase and PubMed was performed. Articles that provided a comprehensive description of a case report containing 1) cancer patient(s) treated with (a combination of) immune checkpoint inhibitors, and 2) assessed occurrence of ocular adverse events, were included. A total of 290 case reports were included. Results Melanoma (n = 179; 61.7%) and lung cancer (n = 56; 19.3%) were the most frequent reported malignancies. The primary used ICIs were nivolumab (n = 123; 42.5%) and ipilimumab (n = 116; 40.0%). Uveitis was most the common adverse event (n = 134; 46.2%) and mainly related to melanoma. Neuro-ophthalmic disorders, including myasthenia gravis and cranial nerve disorders, were the second most common adverse events (n = 71; 24.5%), mainly related to lung cancer. Adverse events affecting the orbit and the cornea were reported in 33 (11.4%) and 30 cases (10.3%) respectively. Adverse events concerning the retina were reported in 26 cases (9.0%). Conclusion The aim of this paper is to provide an overview of all reported ocular adverse events related to the use of ICIs. The insights retrieved from this review might contribute to a better understanding of the underlying mechanisms of these ocular adverse events. Particularly, the difference between actual immune-related adverse events and paraneoplastic syndromes might be relevant. These findings might be of great value in establishing guidelines on how to manage ocular adverse events related to ICIs.

No abstract

Immune checkpoint inhibition has improved the clinical outcomes for numerous patients with cancer. However, the downside is a whole new spectrum of immune-related adverse events. We report a 68-year-old man with a history of nonsmall cell lung cancer presenting with a spontaneous corneal perforation in the right eye after 22 cycles of pembrolizumab. In addition, a chronic central nonhealing epithelial defect developed after performing a penetrating keratoplasty. Treatment with autologous serum drops resulted in complete healing of the corneal ulcer, where other conventional therapies had no effect. One month after reinitiating pembrolizumab therapy, our patient presented again with a corneal perforation in the fellow eye. This case describes relapsing sterile ulcerations associated with pembrolizumab use and presents an unexpected cure.

Imaging suggested that the lobular network of deep retinal deposits in Sjögren reticular dystrophy is the result of accumulation of both pigment and lipofuscin between photoreceptors and retinal pigment epithelium, as well as within the retinal pigment epithelium.

We hypothesize that nivolumab, an immune checkpoint inhibitor, can provoke paraneoplastic acute exudative polymorphous vitelliform maculopathy by means of a tumoral immune reaction with cross-reaction against the retinal pigment epithelium.

Purpose This paper is a scoping review of research on multiple sclerosis (MS)‐associated uveitis to determine its epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical features and treatment. Methods A comprehensive search of the medical databases MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, Web of Science and Cochrane was carried out on 25 November 2019, to identify papers published between 1980 and 2019 that focus on patients with MS‐associated uveitis. Results Based on large cohort studies (n ≥ 1000), the prevalence of uveitis in patients with MS is estimated to be 0.53–1.34% (mean = 0.83%), and MS is diagnosed in 0.52–3.20% (mean = 1.30%) of patients with uveitis. The condition is most frequent among middle‐aged women. Patients usually complain of floaters and/or blurred vision, with bilateral intermediate uveitis (with retinal vasculitis) as the most frequent ophthalmological finding. Both MS and intermediate uveitis are associated with HLA‐DRB1*15:01 and IL‐2RA gene polymorphism rs2104286 A > G, suggesting a common genetic background. T cells, and possibly B cells, play an important role in both autoimmune disorders. Multiple sclerosis (MS)‐related uveitis is classically treated as non‐infectious uveitis, with corticosteroids as the first treatment step. Other treatments include immunosuppressants, cryotherapy, laser photocoagulation and vitrectomy. These treatment options have a limited, if any, effect on the course of MS and can be complicated by side‐effects. As treatment strategies for MS have increased in the last decade, it would be interesting to evaluate the efficacy of these new treatments during the course of uveitis. Moreover, the correlation between retinal periphlebitis and MS could be established more accurately with the recently developed techniques of wide‐field fluorescein angiography in a large cohort of MS patients. Conclusion MS‐associated uveitis is a rare, highly discussed pathology about which much is still unknown. Large epidemiological studies and extrapolation of new MS treatments to this condition are warranted.

Purpose To describe different ocular paraneoplastic syndromes in patients treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICI), its relation with different types of ICI and different types of tumors, and its implications for treatment. Methods A comprehensive review of the literature was performed. Results Patients treated with ICI can present with different ocular paraneoplastic syndromes, such as Carcinoma Associated Retinopathy (CAR), Melanoma Associated Retinopathy (MAR) and paraneoplastic Acute Exudative Polymorphous Vitelliform Maculopathy (pAEPVM). In literature, the different types of paraneoplastic retinopathy are mostly related to different types of primary tumors, with MAR and pAEPVM seen in melanoma, and CAR in carcinoma. Visual prognosis is limited in MAR and CAR. Conclusion Paraneoplastic disorders result from an antitumor immune response against a shared autoantigen between the tumor and ocular tissue. ICI enhance the antitumor immune response, which can lead to increased cross-reaction against ocular structures and unmasking of a predisposed paraneoplastic syndrome. Different types of primary tumors are related to different cross-reactive antibodies. Therefore, the different types of paraneoplastic syndromes are related to different types of primary tumors and are probably unrelated to the type of ICI. ICI-related paraneoplastic syndromes often lead to an ethical dilemma. Continuation of ICI treatment can lead to irreversible visual loss in MAR and CAR. In these cases overall survival must be weighed against quality of life. In pAEPVM however, the vitelliform lesions can disappear with tumor control, which may involve continuation of ICI.