BackgroundProne whole breast irradiation (WBI) leads to reduced heart and lung doses in breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant radiotherapy. In this feasibility trial, we investigated the prone position for whole breast + lymph node irradiation (WB + LNI).MethodsA new support device was developed for optimal target coverage, on which patients are positioned in a position resembling a phase from the crawl swimming technique (prone crawl position). Five left sided breast cancer patients were included and simulated in supine and prone position. For each patient, a treatment plan was made in prone and supine position for WB + LNI to the whole axilla and the unoperated part of the axilla. Patients served as their own controls for comparing dosimetry of target volumes and organs at risk (OAR) in prone versus in supine position.ResultsTarget volume coverage differed only slightly between prone and supine position. Doses were significantly reduced (P < 0.05) in prone position for ipsilateral lung (Dmean, D2, V5, V10, V20, V30), contralateral lung (Dmean, D2), contralateral breast (Dmean, D2 and for total axillary WB + LNI also V5), thyroid (Dmean, D2, V5, V10, V20, V30), oesophagus (Dmean and for partial axillary WB + LNI also D2 and V5), skin (D2 and for partial axillary WB + LNI V105 and V107). There were no significant differences for heart and humeral head doses.ConclusionsProne crawl position in WB + LNI allows for good breast and nodal target coverage with better sparing of ipsilateral lung, thyroid, contralateral breast, contralateral lung and oesophagus when compared to supine position. There is no difference in heart and humeral head doses.Trial registrationNo trial registration was performed because there were no therapeutic interventions.

We report on a dosimetrical study comparing supine (S) and prone-crawl (P) position for radiotherapy of whole breast (WB) and loco-regional lymph node regions, including the internal mammary chain (LN_IM). Six left sided breast cancer patients were CT-simulated in S and P positions and four patients only in P position. Treatment plans were made using non-coplanar volumetric modulated arc photon therapy (VMAT) or pencil beam scanning intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT). Dose prescription was 15*2.67 Gy(GyRBE). The average mean heart doses for S or P VMAT were 5.6 or 4.3 Gy, respectively (p = 0.16) and 1.02 or 1.08 GyRBE, respectively for IMPT (p = 0.8; p < 0.001 for IMPT versus VMAT). The average mean lung doses for S or P VMAT were 5.91 or 2.90 Gy, respectively (p = 0.002) and 1.56 or 1.09 GyRBE, respectively for IMPT (p = 0.016). In high-risk patients, average (range) thirty-year mortality rates from radiotherapy-related cardiac injury and lung cancer were estimated at 6.8(5.4–9.4)% or 3.8(2.8–5.1)% for S or P VMAT (p < 0.001), respectively, and 1.6(1.1–2.0)% or 1.2(0.8–1.6)% for S or P IMPT (p = 0.25), respectively. Radiation-related mortality risk could outweigh the ~8% disease-specific survival benefit of WB + LN_IM radiotherapy for S VMAT but not P VMAT. IMPT carries the lowest radiation-related mortality risks.

No abstract

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is highly overexpressed in prostate cancer. Many PSMA analog radiotracers for PET/CT prostate cancer staging have been developed, such as 68 Ga-PSMA-11. This radiotracer has achieved good results in multiple clinical trials, but because of the superior imaging characteristics of 18 F-fluoride, 18 F-PSMA-11 was developed. The aim of this study was to evaluate the administration safety and radiation dosimetry of 18 F-PSMA-11. Methods: Six patients (aged 62-68 y; mean, 66 ± 2 y) with suspected prostate cancer recurrence after previous treatment were administered 2 MBq of 18 F-PSMA-11 per kilogram of body weight and then underwent low-dose PET/CT imaging at 0, 20, 50, 90, and 300 min after injection. To evaluate the safety of administration, vital parameters were monitored. To assess toxicity, full blood count and biochemical parameters were determined. According to the latest International Commission on Radiological Protection recommendations, radiation dosimetry analysis was performed using IDAC-Dose 2.1. For blood activity measurement, small samples of venous blood were collected at various time points after injection. The unbound 18 F-fluoride fraction was determined in plasma at 20, 50, and 90 min after administration to evaluate the defluorination rate of 18 F-PSMA-11. Results: After injection, 18 F-PSMA-11 cleared rapidly from the blood. At 5 h after injection, 29.0% ± 5.9% of the activity was excreted in urine. The free 18 F fraction in plasma increased from 9.7% ± 1.0% 20 min after injection to 22.2% ± 1.5% 90 min after injection. The highest tracer uptake was observed in kidneys, bladder, spleen, and liver. No study drug-related adverse events were observed. The calculated mean effective dose was 12.8 ± 0.6 μSv/MBq. Conclusion: 18 F-PSMA-11 can be safely administered and results in a mean effective dose of 12.8 ± 0.6 μSv/MBq. Therefore, the total radiation dose is lower than for other PSMA PET agents and in the same range as 18 F-DCFPyL.