The soil bacterial isolate Variovorax sp. strain SRS16 mineralizes the phenylurea herbicide linuron. The proposed pathway initiates with hydrolysis of linuron to 3,4-dichloroaniline (DCA) and N,O-dimethylhydroxylamine, followed by conversion of DCA to Krebs cycle intermediates. Differential proteomic analysis showed a linuron-dependent upregulation of several enzymes that fit into this pathway, including an amidase (LibA), a multicomponent chloroaniline dioxygenase, and enzymes associated with a modified chlorocatechol ortho- The phenylurea herbicide linuron is a nonselective preemergent herbicide that acts as a photosystem II inhibitor. The herbicide is globally used to control a wide variety of annual and perennial broadleaf and grassy weeds in agricultural land. Microbial degradation is considered an important mechanism in the dissipation of linuron and other phenylurea herbicides in the environment. Several bacterial strains (39, 46), as well as consortia (5, 10), able to degrade and even use the compound as a sole source of carbon and nitrogen have been reported. Although derived from different geographical locations, most of the linuron-catabolizing isolates, either individual strains or key members of linurondegrading consortia, belong to the genus Variovorax. This suggests that this genus plays an important role in linuron degradation in soil. The proposed pathway of linuron catabolism starts with amide hydrolysis to 3,4-dichloroaniline (DCA) and N,O-dimethylhydroxylamine (N,O-DMHA) (Fig. 1). DCA is harmful and recalcitrant, while N,O-DMHA is not and degraded easily. Several linuron-degrading Variovorax strains, in addition to mediating linuron hydrolysis, are able to use DCA as the sole carbon source and mineralize it. To date, little is known about the genes and enzymes responsible for linuron and DCA degradation. Engelhardt et al. (13) described an arylacyl amidase responsible for conversion of linuron to DCA in Bacillus sphaericus ATCC 12123. In addition, phenylurea hydrolase-encoding genes puhA and puhB were identified in the linuron-degrading actinomycetes Arthrobacter globiformis D47 (52) and Mycobacterium brisbanense JK1 (23), respectively. PuhA and PuhB form a novel branch within the metal-dependent amidohydrolase superfamily (23). Regarding the degradation of DCA, Dejonghe (9) and Breugelmans et al. (6) found indications for the involvement of a multicomponent aniline dioxygenase enzyme in DCA degradation in Variovorax sp. strain WDL1. However, the genes responsible for DCA degradation in linuron-mineralizing bacteria have not yet been identified.We report here on the identification of the linuron and DCA degradation genes in the linuron-mineralizing strain Variovorax sp. strain SRS16 (46). The enzyme responsible for hydrolysis of linuron was purified and characterized. The expression of the catabolic genes under different conditions

Real-time PCR and PCR-denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) approaches that specifically target the Variovorax 16S rRNA gene were developed to estimate the number and diversity of Variovorax in environmental ecosystems. PCR primers suitable for both methods were selected as such that the enclosed sequence showed maximum polymorphism. PCR specificity was maximized by combining PCR with a targeted endonuclease treatment of template DNA to eliminate 16S rRNA genes of the closely related Acidovorax. DGGE allowed the grouping of PCR amplicons according to the phylogenetic grouping within the genus Variovorax. The toolbox was used to assess the Variovorax community dynamics in agricultural soil microcosms (SMs) exposed to the phenylurea herbicide linuron. Exposure to linuron resulted in an increased abundance within the Variovorax community of a subgroup previously linked to linuron degradation through cultivation-dependent isolation. SMs that were treated only once with linuron reverted to the initial community composition 70 days after linuron exposure. In contrast, SMs irrigated with linuron on a long-term base showed a significant increase in Variovorax number after 70 days. Our data support the hypothesis that the genus Variovorax is involved in linuron degradation in linuron-treated agricultural soils.

SummaryVariovorax sp. WDL1 mediates hydrolysis of the herbicide linuron into 3,4-dichloroaniline (DCA) and N,Odimethylhydroxylamine in a tripartite bacterial consortium with Comamonas testosteroni WDL7 and Hyphomicrobium sulfonivorans WDL6. Although strain WDL1 contains the dcaQTA1A2B operon for DCA oxidation, this conversion is mainly performed by WDL7. Phenotypic diversification observed in WDL1 cultures and scrutiny of the WDL1 genome suggest that WDL1 cultures consist of two dedicated subpopulations, i.e., a linuron-hydrolysing subpopulation (Lin 1 DCA-) and a DCA-oxidizing subpopulation (Lin-DCA1). Whole genome analysis of strains representing the respective subpopulations revealed that they are identical, aside from the presence of hylA (in Lin 1 DCA-cells) and the dcaQ-TA1A2B gene cluster (in Lin-DCA1 cells), and that these catabolic gene modules replace each other at exactly the same locus on a 1380 kb extrachromosomal element that shows plasmid gene functions including genes for transferability by conjugation. Both subpopulations proliferate in consortium biofilms fed with linuron, but Lin 1 DCAcells compose the main WDL1 subpopulation. Our observations instigated revisiting the interactions within the consortium and suggest that the physical separation of two essential linuron catabolic gene clusters in WDL1 by mutually exclusive integration in the same mobile genetic element is key to the existence of WDL1 in a consortium mode.

The proteobacteria Variovorax sp. WDL1, Comamonas testosteroni WDL7, and Hyphomicrobium sulfonivorans WDL6 compose a triple‐species consortium that synergistically degrades and grows on the phenylurea herbicide linuron. To acquire a better insight into the interactions between the consortium members and the underlying molecular mechanisms, we compared the transcriptomes of the key biodegrading strains WDL7 and WDL1 grown as biofilms in either isolation or consortium conditions by differential RNAseq analysis. Differentially expressed pathways and cellular systems were inferred using the network‐based algorithm PheNetic. Coculturing affected mainly metabolism in WDL1. Significantly enhanced expression of hylA encoding linuron hydrolase was observed. Moreover, differential expression of several pathways involved in carbohydrate, amino acid, nitrogen, and sulfur metabolism was observed indicating that WDL1 gains carbon and energy from linuron indirectly by consuming excretion products from WDL7 and/or WDL6. Moreover, in consortium conditions, WDL1 showed a pronounced stress response and overexpression of cell to cell interaction systems such as quorum sensing, contact‐dependent inhibition, and Type VI secretion. Since the latter two systems can mediate interference competition, it prompts the question if synergistic linuron degradation is the result of true adaptive cooperation or rather a facultative interaction between bacteria that coincidentally occupy complementary metabolic niches.

The microbial bioremediation of contaminants is cost effective and reliable and a number of approaches are in widespread commercial use. Microbial bioremediation makes use of the metabolic activities of biofilm-dwelling microorganisms which are responsible for the majority of pollutant degradation in natural environments.In this book, renowned scientists from around the world provide up-to-date and authoritative reviews of the latest scientific research that has contributed to our understanding of the vital importance of microbial biofilms for the biological remediation of contaminated environments. The results of a variety of key case studies are presented to highlight the broad range of treatment approaches and applications at our disposal. In addition, the authors discuss the future trends and likely growth areas in biofilm-related research.This comprehensive volume is indispensable for anyone involved in bioremediation, biofilm research or environmental microbiology. It is also recommended as a reference work for all microbiology libraries. Chapter 1. Engineering Successful Bioremediation (Michael Harbottle) Chapter 2. The Biofilm Concept from a Bioremediation Perspective (Benjamin Horemans, Pieter Albers and Dirk Springael) Chapter 3. Biofilm Survival Strategies in Polluted Environments