Application of machine learning (ML) to the prediction of reaction activation barriers is a new and exciting field for these algorithms. The works covered here are specifically those in which ML is trained to predict the activation energies of homogeneous chemical reactions, where the activation energy is given by the energy difference between the reactants and transition state of a reaction. Particular attention is paid to works that have applied ML to directly predict reaction activation energies, the limitations that may be found in these studies, and where comparisons of different types of chemical features for ML models have been made. Also explored are models that have been able to obtain high predictive accuracies, but with reduced datasets, using the Gaussian process regression ML model. In these studies, the chemical reactions for which activation barriers are modeled include those involving small organic molecules, aromatic rings, and organometallic catalysts. Also provided are brief explanations of some of the most popular types of ML models used in chemistry, as a beginner's guide for those unfamiliar.

No abstract

Here, we compare the relative performances of different force fields for conformational searching of hydrogen-bond-donating catalyst-like molecules. We assess the force fields by their predictions of conformer energies, geometries, low-energy, nonredundant conformers, and the maximum numbers of possible conformers. Overall, MM3, MMFFs, and OPLS3e had consistently strong performances and are recommended for conformationally searching molecules structurally similar to those in this study.

Assessing the safety of new chemicals, without introducing the need for animal testing, is a task of great importance. The Ames test, a widely used bioassay to assess mutagenicity, can be an expensive, wasteful process with animal-derived reagents. Existing in silico methods for the prediction of Ames test results are traditionally based on chemical category formation and can lead to false positive predictions. Category formation also neglects the intrinsic chemistry associated with DNA reactivity. Activation energies and HOMO/LUMO energies for thirty 1,4 Michael acceptors were calculated using a model nucleobase and were further used to predict the Ames test result of these compounds. The proposed model builds upon existing work and examines the fundamental toxicant–target interactions using density functional theory transition-state modeling. The results show that Michael acceptors with activation energies <20.7 kcal/mol and LUMO energies < −1.85 eV are likely to act as direct mutagens upon exposure to DNA.

No abstract