Background: The preoperative number of dislocations has been previously proved to be a major factor influencing the results after Bankart repair with more preoperative dislocations correlated with higher recurrence rates and more reoperations. This could possibly be because of the lower quality of the tissue repaired during the procedure after multiple dislocations. On the other hand, the Latarjet procedure does not ''repair'' but rather reconstructs and augments the anterior glenoid.Purpose/Hypothesis: The main objective was to report the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing a Latarjet procedure after 1 dislocation versus multiple (2) dislocations. The hypothesis was that the preoperative number of dislocations would not influence clinical results.Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3.Methods: Patients older than 18 years who had undergone a primary Latarjet procedure for shoulder instability with at least 2 years of follow-up were included. Three different techniques were used: a mini-open technique using 2 screws, an arthroscopic technique using 2 screws, and an arthroscopic technique using 2 cortical buttons. Patients were evaluated and answered a questionnaire to assess the number of episodes of dislocation before surgery, the time between the first dislocation and surgery, recurrence of the dislocation, revision surgery, the Walch-Duplay score, the Simple Shoulder Test score, and the visual analog scale (VAS) score for pain.Results: A total of 308 patients were included for analysis with a mean follow-up of 3.4 6 0.8 years. Of that, 83 patients were included in the first-time dislocation group and 225 in the recurrent dislocation group. At last follow-up, the rates of recurrence and reoperation were not significantly different between groups: 4.8% in the first-time dislocation group versus 3.65% in the recurrent dislocation group and 6.1% versus 4.0%, respectively. The overall Walch-Duplay scores at last follow-up were also comparable between the 2 groups, 67.3 6 24.85 and 71.8 6 25.1, even though the first-time dislocation group showed a lower pain subscore (15.0 6 8.6 vs 18.0 6 7.5; P = .003). The VAS for pain was also significantly higher in the first-time dislocation group compared with the recurrent dislocation group (1.8 6 2.3 vs 1.2 6 1.7; P = .03). Conclusion:The number of episodes of dislocation before surgery does not affect postoperative instability rates and reoperation rates after the Latarjet procedure. However, patients with first-time dislocations had more postoperative pain compared with patients with recurrent dislocations before surgery.

Purpose Graft failure and secondary meniscal tears are major concerns after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction in young athletes. The aim was to evaluate the link between ACL reconstruction with and without anterolateral ligament (ALL) reconstruction and outcomes in young patients participating in pivoting sports. Methods This was a retrospective study of data collected prospectively. Patients less than 20 years, involved in pivoting sports and undergoing primary ACL reconstruction with a quadruple hamstring tendon (4HT) graft or 4HT graft combined with anterolateral ligament reconstruction (4HT + ALL) were included. Survival analysis was performed to identify the prognostic indicators for reoperation due to graft failure or secondary meniscal lesions. Knee laxity was assessed and patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) were collected. Results A total of 203 patients (mean (± SD) age: 16.3 ± 2 years) with a mean follow-up of 4.8 ± 0.9 (range: 3.3-6.8) years were included. There were 101 4HT and 102 4HT + ALL grafts. Graft rupture rates were 11.9% for 4HT grafts and 5.8% for 4HT + ALL grafts (n.s.). There were 9.9% secondary meniscal procedures for 4HT grafts vs. 1.9% for 4HT + ALL grafts (p = 0.02). With reoperation for graft failure or secondary meniscal lesions at inal follow-up as the endpoint, survival was better in the 4HT + ALL group (91.4% vs. 77.8%, respectively; p = 0.03). Absence of ALL reconstruction (HR = 4.9 [95%CI: 1.4-17.9]; p = 0.01) and preoperative side-to-side laxity > 3 mm (HR = 3.1 [95%CI: 1.03-9.1]; p = 0.04) were independently associated with an increased rate of reoperations. Mean (± SD) side-to-side laxity was 1.3 ± 1.3 mm (range: − 2 to 5) for 4HT grafts vs. 0.9 ± 1.3 mm (range: − 6 to 4.8) for 4HT + ALL grafts (n.s.) 6 months post-surgery. The rate of return to the same sport at the same level was 42.2% for 4HT grafts vs. 52% for 4HT + ALL grafts (n.s.). There was no signiicant diference in subjective outcomes including PROMs between the two groups. Conclusion Combined ALL + ACL reconstruction reduced the rate of graft failure and secondary meniscal injury in young athletes when compared to ACL reconstruction alone. Subjective results were comparable, with a similar rate of complications. Combined reconstruction should be preferred in this young population. Level of evidence Level IV.

PurposeAnterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) using a short, quadrupled semitendinosus (ST‐4) autograft, fixed with an adjustable suspensory fixation (ASF), has several potential advantages. However, the construct is suspected to generate micromotion, tunnel widening and poor graft maturation. The aim of this study was to evaluate post‐operative tibial tunnel expansion, graft maturation and clinical outcomes for this type of ACLR. MethodsOne‐hundred and forty‐nine patients were reviewed at a minimum of 2 years following 4‐ST ACLR, mean 25.6 ± 3.5 months [24–55], with clinical follow‐up and MRI scans. Graft maturity of the intra‐articular part of the graft and the tibial tunnel portion was assessed using Signal‐to‐Noise Quotient (SNQ) and Howell score. Tibial tunnel expansion, bone–graft contact and graft volume in the tibial tunnel were calculated from the MRI scans. ResultsMean tibial tunnel expansion was 13 ± 16.5% [12–122]. Mean SNQ for graft within the tibial tunnel was 3.8 ± 7.1 [ – 7.7 to 39] and 2.0 ± 3.5 [ – 14 to 17] for the intra‐articular portion of the graft. The Howell score for graft within the tibial tunnel was 41% Grade I, 37% Grade 2, 20% Grade 3, 2% grade 4, and for the intra‐articular part 61% Grade 1, 26% Grade 2, 13% Grade 3 and 1% Grade 4. The mean tibial tunnel bone–graft contact was 81 ± 23% [0–100] and mean graft volume was 80 ± 22% [0–100]. No correlation was found between tibial tunnel expansion and graft maturity assessed at both locations. Graft maturity was correlated with higher graft‐bone contact and graft volume in the tibial tunnel (p < 0.05). ConclusionsST‐4 ACLR with ASF had low levels of tunnel enlargement at 2 years. No correlation was found between graft maturation and tibial tunnel expansion. Graft maturity was correlated with graft–bone contact and graft volume in the tibial tunnel. Level of evidenceLevel III.

Aims The primary aim of this study was to determine the ten-year outcome following surgical treatment for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). We assessed whether the evolution of practice from open to arthroscopic techniques influenced outcomes and tested whether any patient, radiological, or surgical factors were associated with outcome. Methods Prospectively collected data of a consecutive single-surgeon cohort, operated for FAI between January 2005 and January 2015, were retrospectively studied. The cohort comprised 393 hips (365 patients; 71% male (n = 278)), with a mean age of 34.5 years (SD 10.0). Over the study period, techniques evolved from open surgical dislocation (n = 94) to a combined arthroscopy-Hueter technique (HA + Hueter; n = 61) to a pure arthroscopic technique (HA; n = 238). Outcome measures of interest included modes of failures, complications, reoperation, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Demographic, radiological, and surgical factors were tested for possible association with outcome. Results At a mean follow-up of 7.5 years (SD 2.5), there were 43 failures in 38 hips (9.7%), with 35 hips (8.9%) having one failure mode, one hip (0.25%) having two failure modes, and two hips (0.5%) having three failure modes. The five- and ten-year hip joint preservation rates were 94.1% (SD 1.2%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 91.8 to 96.4) and 90.4% (SD 1.7%; 95% CI 87.1 to 93.7), respectively. Inferior survivorship was detected in the surgical dislocation group. Age at surgery, Tönnis grade, cartilage damage, and absence of rim-trimming were associated with improved preservation rates. Only Tönnis grade was an independent predictor of hip preservation. All PROMs improved postoperatively. Factors associated with improvement in PROMs included higher lateral centre-edge and α angles, and lower retroversion index and BMI. Conclusion FAI surgery provides lasting improvement in function and a joint preservation rate of 90.4% at ten years. The evolution of practice was not associated with inferior outcome. Since degree of arthritis is the primary predictor of outcome, improved awareness and screening may lead to prompt intervention and better outcomes. Cite this article: Bone Jt Open 2022;3(10):804–814.

Purpose The purpose of this study was to analyze the clinical outcomes and radiologic position of the knee in two groups of patients after medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA): one group with residual varus axis (RVA) alignment and other one with neutral mechanical axis (NMA) of the lower limb. Methods All patients who underwent UKA between January 2015 and January 2018 were evaluated retrospectively. Inclusion criteria were: medial UKA for isolated medial femoro-tibial osteoarthritis, a varus deformity of < 15°, and a minimal follow-up of 2 years. All patients had a preoperative and postoperative clinical examination with functional scores (New International Knee Score (NewIKS) and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and radiographs. Preoperative and postoperative values for continuous outcomes were compared using the Student's t test for paired data and diferences between the groups were compared with the Mann-Whitney U test. p < 0.05 was considered statistically signiicant. ResultsThe RVA group consisted of 48 cases of medial UKA in 48 patients (22 females). Mean postoperative hip-kneeankle (HKA) angle was 174.3° ± 2.8 and the corresponding mean AKI angle (tibial mechanical angle) was 82.9° ± 2.9. The NMA group consisted of 35 cases of medial UKA in 35 patients (14 females). Mean postoperative HKA angle was 178.9° ± 3 and the corresponding mean AKI angle was 85.5° ± 3.1. A signiicant diference was found between the two groups for the KOOS score and for global NewIKS, with a better score in the RVA group. Conclusions RVA alignment after medial UKA results in a signiicant improvement in functional knee scores at 2-year postsurgery. Return to sport and recreational activities was better than in patients with postoperative NMA. Level of evidence Level 3; retrospective cohort study.

Background: Preoperative planning is a fundamental step for successful total hip arthroplasty (THA). Studies have highlighted the accuracy of preoperative digital templating for estimating acetabular cup and stem size. Stem design such as single-wedge metadiaphyseal (Type 1 stem) versus mid-short stem (microplasty) and surgical approach (anterior, direct lateral or posterior) have not been well investigated as predictors of THA templating accuracy. Methods: 204 patients (220 hips) who had undergone elective THA between November 2016 and December 2019 and presented a saved preoperative template were retrospectively reviewed. Templates from 5 different surgeons were involved in the analysis. 3 different approaches were used: direct lateral (DL), posterior (PA), direct anterior (DAA). 2 different stem designs were used: single-wedge metadiaphyseal and single-wedge mid-short (Biomet Taperloc Microplasty), while the acetabular component remained the same. Bivariate and multivariate regression analyses were performed to determine predictors of accuracy. Results: Femoral component size templating accuracy was significantly improved when using the single-wedge mid-short stem (Taperloc Microplasty) design when performing bivariate analysis. Although accuracy of cup sizing was not affected by approach, precision was significantly better in the PA group ( p < 0.05). Accuracy of templating was found to be independent of BMI and gender but dependent on presence of calibration marker and stem design ( p < 0.05). Conclusions: When striving for improved templating accuracy, acetabular and femoral component accuracy were best achieved using a calibration marker and a metaphyseal short femoral stem design.

Study design: This was a prospective validation study with technical notes. Objective: This study aimed to validate a new ultra-low-dose full-spine protocol for reproducible Cobb angle measurementsthe "nano-dose" protocol. Summary of Background Data: Scoliosis is a 3-dimensional (3D) deformity of the spine characterized by 3D clinical parameters. Nevertheless, 2D Cobb angle remains an essential and widely used radiologic measure in clinical practice. Repeated imaging is required for the assessment and follow-up of scoliosis patients. The resultant high dose of absorbed radiation increases the potential risk of developing radiation-induced cancer in such patients. Micro-dose radiographic imaging is already available in clinical practice, but the radiation dose delivered to the patient could be further reduced. Methods: An anthropomorphic child phantom was used to establish an ultra-low-dose protocol in the EOS Imaging System still allowing Cobb angle measurements, defined as nano-dose. A group of 23 consecutive children presenting for scoliosis assessment, 12 years of age or younger, were assessed with standarddose or micro-dose and additional nano-dose full-spine imaging modalities. Intraobserver and interobserver reliability of determining the reliability of 2D Cobb angle measurements was performed. The dosimetry was performed in the anthropomorphic phantom to confirm theoretical radiation dose reduction. Results: A nano-dose protocol was established for reliable Cobb angle measurements. Dose area product with this new nano-dose protocol was reduced to 5 mGy×cm 2 , corresponding to one sixth of the micro-dose protocol (30 mGy×cm 2) and <1/40th of the standard-dose protocol (222 mGy×cm 2). Theoretical dose reduction, for posteroanterolateral positioning was confirmed using phantom dosimetry. Our study showed good reliability and repeatability between the 2 groups. Cobb variability was <5 degrees from the mean using 95% confidence intervals. Conclusions: We propose a new clinically validated nano-dose protocol for routine follow-up of scoliosis patients before surgery, keeping the radiation dose at a bare minimum, while allowing for reproducible Cobb angle measurements.

Objectives: The rate of repeat graft ruptures in young athletes is a major concern after ACL reconstruction. Our objective was to evaluate the association between two reconstruction techniques and repeat ruptures, repeat surgery, return to sports and complications in center playing sportspersons younger than 20 years of age. Methods: A prospective study was conducted in patients under 20 years of age who were center players and who had primary ACL reconstruction with a semitendinosus graft (ST4) by a suspension technique, or a semitendinosus graft with suspension technique combined with independent anterolateral ligament reconstruction (ST4+ALL). Patients were followed up in a minimum of 2 years. Survival data from the Kaplan-Meier analysis were used as well as multivariate logistic regression to identify risk factors for repeat rupture. 203 patients (mean age, 16.3±2 years) with a mean follow-up of 40.6±11 months (24-63 months) were included. There were 101 patients in the ST4 group, and 102 patients in the ST4+ALL group. Results: There was a 9.9% repeat in ruptures in the ST4 group versus 5.8% in the ST4+ALL group (p=0.288). The rate of repeat ruptures in the ST4+ALL group was 5 times lower than in the ST4 group in multivariate analysis (odds ratio [OR], 0.201; 95% CI, 0.044-0.922). There was a 6.9% rate of secondary meniscal procedures in the ST4 group versus 1.9% in the ST4+ALL group (p=0.101). Differential laxity was 1.3±1.3 (-2 - 5) in the ST4 group versus 0.9±1.3 (-6 - 4.8) in the ST4+ALL group (p=0.008). There was a 42.2% return to the same sports level in the ST4 group versus 52% in the ST4+ALL group (p=0.178). The mean postoperative scores at the last follow-up were: IKDC: 83.3±14.3 and 82±14.4; ACL-RSI: 69.8±23.5 and 67.4±22.4; Tegner: 6.6±1.8 and 6.9±1.8 and Lysholm: 86.4±15.2 and 86±16.8; for ST4 and ST4+ALL groups, respectively. Conclusion: Anterolateral ligament reconstruction reduces the rate of repeat ruptures in athletes younger than 20 years of age after a semitendinosus graft. It is also associated with fewer secondary meniscal procedures, better control of laxity and a better rate of return to the same level of sports without further complications.