In this paper, several existing porous bleed models are implemented into the in-house RANS-solver elsA, and their performance are evaluated on two different flow cases. Reference simulations are performed to evaluate the accuracy of the applied bleed models and to show the lack of modeling different plate geometries. The models significantly differ in predicting the bleed mass flux along the plate. For the turbulent supersonic boundary layer bleeding, the reference simulations demonstrate a hole diameter influence on the flow, but none of the models considers this effect. The model of Slater fits well with the reference simulation by applying it to its extracted data. However, applying the bleed models as a boundary condition results in more significant deviations from the reference simulation, leading to an overestimation of the wall shear stress and fuller boundary layer profiles downstream of the bleed region. Additionally, in the second flow case, including the shock-boundary layer interaction, the effect of the porous bleed is overestimated. No model is found suitable for a shock-boundary layer interaction control, and essential parameters such as the bleed hole diameter are not considered.
In this paper, several existing porous bleed models are implemented intothe in-house RANS-solver elsA, and their performance are evaluated ontwo different flow cases. Reference simulations are performed to evalu-ate the accuracy of the applied bleed models and to show the lack ofmodeling different plate geometries. The models significantly differ inpredicting the bleed mass flux along the plate. For the turbulent super-sonic boundary layer bleeding, the reference simulations demonstrate ahole diameter influence on the flow, but none of the models considersthis effect. The model of Slater fits well with the reference simulationby applying it to its extracted data. However, applying the bleed mod-els as a boundary condition results in more significant deviations fromthe reference simulation, leading to an overestimation of the wall shearstress and fuller boundary layer profiles downstream of the bleed region.Additionally, in the second flow case, including the shock-boundary layerinteraction, the effect of the porous bleed is overestimated. No modelis found suitable for a shock-boundary layer interaction control, andessential parameters such as the bleed hole diameter are not considered.
In this paper, several existing porous bleed models are implemented into the in-house RANS-solver elsA, and their performance is evaluated on two different flow cases. Reference simulations are performed to evaluate the accuracy of the applied bleed models and to show the lack of modeling different plate geometries. The models significantly differ in predicting the bleed mass flux along the plate. For the turbulent supersonic boundary layer bleeding, the reference simulations demonstrate a hole diameter influence on the flow, but none of the models considers this effect. The model of Slater fits well with the reference simulation by applying it to its extracted data. However, applying the bleed models as a boundary condition results in more significant deviations from the reference simulation, leading to an overestimation of the wall shear stress and fuller boundary layer profiles downstream of the bleed region. Additionally, in the second flow case, including the shock-boundary layer interaction, the effect of the porous bleed is overestimated. No model is found suitable for a shock-boundary layer interaction control, and essential parameters such as the bleed hole diameter are not considered.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.