No abstract

Background: The trading of individual animal genotype information often involves only the exchange of the called genotypes and not necessarily the additional information required to effectively call structural variants. The main aim here was to determine if it is possible to impute copy number variants (CNVs) using the flanking single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) haplotype structure in cattle. While this objective was achieved using high-density genotype panels (i.e., 713,162 SNPs), a secondary objective investigated the concordance of CNVs called with this high-density genotype panel compared to CNVs called from a medium-density panel (i.e., 45,677 SNPs in the present study). This is the first study to compare CNVs called from high-density and medium-density SNP genotypes from the same animals. High (and medium-density) genotypes were available on 991 Holstein-Friesian, 1015 Charolais, and 1394 Limousin bulls. The concordance between CNVs called from the medium-density and high-density genotypes were calculated separately for each animal. A subset of CNVs which were called from the high-density genotypes was selected for imputation. Imputation was carried out separately for each breed using a set of high-density SNPs flanking the midpoint of each CNV. A CNV was deemed to be imputed correctly when the called copy number matched the imputed copy number.

Copy number variants (CNVs) are a form of genomic variation that changes the structure of the genome through deletion or duplication of stretches of DNA. The objective of the present study was to characterize CNVs in a large multibreed population of beef and dairy bulls. The CNVs were called on the autosomes of 5,551 cattle from 22 different beef and dairy breeds, using 2 freely available software suites, QuantiSNP and PennCNV. All CNVs were classified into either deletions or duplications. The median concordance between PennCNV and QuantiSNP, per animal, was 18.5% for deletions and 0% for duplications. The low concordance rate between PennCNV and QuantiSNP indicated that neither algorithm, by itself, could identify all CNVs in the population. In total, PennCNV and QuantiSNP collectively identified 747,129 deletions and 432,523 duplications; 80.2% of all duplications and 69.1% of all deletions were present only once in the population. Only 0.154% of all CNVs identified were present in more than 50 animals in the population. The distribution of the percentage of the autosomes that were composed of deletions, per animal, was positively skewed, as was the distribution for the percentage of the autosomes that were composed of duplications, per animal. The first quartile, median, and third quartile of the distribution of the percentage of the autosomes that were composed of deletions were 0.019%, 0.037%, and 0.201%, respectively. The first quartile, median, and third quartile of the distribution of the percentage of the autosomes that were composed of duplications were 0.013%, 0.028%, and 0.076%, respectively. The distributions of the number of deletions and duplications per animal were both positively skewed. The interquartile range for the number of deletions per animal in the population was between 16 and 117, whereas for duplications it was between 8 and 23. Per animal, there tended to be twice as many deletions as duplications. The distribution of the length of deletions was positively skewed, as was the distribution of the length of duplications. The interquartile range for the length of deletions in the population was between 25 and 101 kb, and for duplications the interquartile range was between 46 and 235 kb. Per animal, duplications tended to be twice as long as deletions. This study provides a description of the characteristics and distribution of CNVs in a large multibreed population of beef and dairy cattle.