SummaryXenon anaesthesia appears to have minimal haemodynamic effects. The purpose of this randomised prospective study was to compare the cardiovascular effects of xenon and nitrous oxide in patients with known ischaemic heart disease. In 20 patients who were due to undergo coronary artery bypass graft surgery, 30 min following induction of anaesthesia with fentanyl 30 lg.kg )1 and midazolam 0.1 mg.kg )1 but prior to the start of surgery, xenon or nitrous oxide 60% was administered for 15 min. The results showed that xenon caused a minimal decrease in the mean arterial pressure (from 81 (7) to 75 (8) mmHg, mean (SD)), but did not affect the systolic function of the left ventricle, as demonstrated by unchanged left ventricular stroke work index (LVSWI) and the fractional area change of the left ventricle (FAC) derived from transoesophageal echocardiography (TOE). However, in contrast, nitrous oxide was found to decrease the mean arterial pressure (from 81 (8) to 69 (7) mmHg), the LVSWI, and the FAC. The cardiac index, central venous and pulmonary artery occlusion pressures, systemic and pulmonary vascular resistances, and the TOE-derived E ⁄ A ratio through the mitral valve were unchanged by xenon or nitrous oxide. We conclude that xenon provides improved haemodynamic stability compared with nitrous oxide, conserving the left ventricular systolic function.
SummaryCardiac output (CO) determination based on partial CO 2 rebreathing has recently been introduced into clinical practice. The determination of flow is crucial for exact CO readings and the physical properties of xenon, i.e. high density and viscosity, may influence flow readings. This study compared echocardiography-derived CO measurements with the partial rebreathing method during total intravenous (TIVA) vs. xenon-based anaesthesia. Thirty-nine patients ASA physical status III undergoing aortic reconstruction were randomly assigned to receive either xenon (Xe, n = 20) or TIVA (T, n = 19) based general anaesthetic. Paired measurements were taken before xenon administration, after xenon administration, before and after clamping of the abdominal aorta and after declamping and at corresponding time points in the TIVA group. Data were analysed with a Bland-Altmann plot. Bias and precision were acceptable and comparable before xenon administration (T 0.54 ± 0.92 l.min )1 vs. Xe 0.11 ± 1.1 l.min), but after xenon administration CO was largely overestimated by partial CO 2 rebreathing (T 0.04 ± 0.91 l.min )1 vs. Xe )4.0 ± 2.1 l.min )1 ). In the TIVA group, bias and precision after declamping increased significantly (P < 0.01) compared to all time points except baseline. In its current application, the NICO cardiac output monitor appears to be inappropriate for determination of CO during xenon based anaesthesia.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.