No abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:The National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study Low-Risk Criteria were established to identify patients with a low probability of cervical spine injury in whom imaging of the cervical spine was unnecessary. The purpose of this study was to ascertain the number of unnecessary cervical spine CT studies on the basis of proper application of established clinical guidelines and, secondarily, to determine indications for ordering studies in the absence of guideline criteria.

No abstract

Injuries involving the thoracic and lumbar (TL) spine in the setting of blunt trauma are not uncommon. At our institution, CT of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis (CT CAP) with dedicated reformatted images of the thoracolumbar spine (CT TL) is part of the standard work-up of patients following significant blunt trauma. The purpose of this study was to compare the detection rate of TL spine fractures on routine trauma CT CAP with reformatted CT TL spine images and determine whether these reformatted images detect additional fractures and if these altered patient management. The imaging records of 1000 consecutive patients who received blunt trauma protocol CT CAP with CT TL spine reformats were reviewed to determine identification of TL spine fracture in each report. Fracture type and location were documented. Of the 896 patients, 66 (7.4 %) had fractures of the TL spine identified on either CT CAP or CT TL spine. Of these 66 patients, 40 (60.6 %) had fractures identified on both CT CAP and CT TL spine and 24 (36.4 %) had fractures identified on CT TL spine images alone. Fourteen patients required treatment with surgery or bracing, 4 (28.6 %) of which had fractures identified on reformatted TL spine imaging only. In conclusion, a significant number of fractures are detected on TL spine reformats that are not identified on CT CAP alone, altering patient management in a few cases and suggesting that dedicated TL spine reformats should be a standard part of the work-up of blunt trauma patients.

We explore reproductive-aged women's acceptance of contraception counseling in the emergency department (ED).Methods: This study is phase 1 of an exploratory sequential mixed methods study. We purposively interviewed 31 participants with the following criteria: black, white, or Latina race/ethnicity; nonpregnant; aged 15 to 44 years; receiving nonemergency care; not using highly effective contraception; and did not intend to become pregnant. We conducted semistructured interviews with a piloted interview guide until reaching thematic saturation. We coded transcripts with an iteratively developed codebook, maintaining intercoder agreement greater than 80%. Qualitative acceptance of ED contraception counseling was grouped into 3 categories: acceptable, unacceptable, and equivocal. We conducted a thematic text analysis to assess themes expressing support and concern for ED contraception counseling. Qualitative findings were stratified by age, race, and frequency of ED use. Using components of grounded theory, we developed a conceptual model.Results: Most participants (81%) accepted ED contraception counseling. Themes expressing support and concern for ED contraception counseling included opportunity to address women's unmet contraception needs, contraception is within the scope of ED practice, the ED is a convenient setting with competent providers, contraception is a sensitive topic, and the ED may be an inappropriate setting for some women. Latina participants had lower acceptance of ED contraception counseling. Dominant subthemes varied slightly by race, age, and frequency of ED use. Conclusion:Diverse women had high acceptance of contraception counseling in the ED. Perspectives expressing both support and concern in regard to ED contraception counseling were explored in detail. [